Dolichogenidea escobarae Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault 2025, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dolichogenidea escobarae Fernandez-Triana & Boudreault sp. nov. Fig. 50 A – F Type material. Holotype. Brazil • Female, CNC; Guanabara, Represa Rio Grande; vii.1972; F. H. Oliveira leg.; Voucher code: CNC 1179672. Diagnostic description. Anteromesoscutum mostly smooth, with relatively shallow punctures; scutellar disc smooth and shiny, without punctures; T 1 strongly narrowing towards posterior margin (width at anterior margin 1.8 × width at posterior margin), T 1 length 4.5 × its width at posterior margin; T 2 weakly sculptured and trapezoidal, its width at posterior margin 2.5 × its central length; ovipositor sheath 0.9 × metatibia length; all coxae dark brown, all tarsus brown, rest of legs mostly yellow except for metafemur and metatibia with posterior 0.2 brown; body length: 2.83 mm; fore wing length: 2.60 mm. Among species with T 1 not rectangular and T 2 not strongly sculptured, this species is characterized by its strongly narrowing T 1, trapezoidal T 2, all coxae dark brown and ovipositor sheath almost as long as metatibia length. Distribution. Brazil (RJ). Biology. No host data available. DNA barcoding data. No data. Etymology. The second author dedicates this species in honor of Cecilia Escobar of the Smithsonian Institution (USNM) in Washington DC, USA. Cecilia has been of tremendous help when I visited the Smithsonian twice. Cecilia has been an inspiration by her joyful personality, kindness and her love of insects. Notes. About the type locality, we received a personal communication from Eduardo Shimbori to consider ‘ Estado da Guanabara’ as a proxy for the current municipality of Rio de Janeiro. That is because this former state was fairly small and most of its area corresponds to what is now the territory of the capital of the actual Rio de Janeiro state (the Wikipedia page shows in red the area of the Guanabara state compared to the area of the Rio de Janeiro state: https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guanabara). In old maps of the Estado da Guanabara it is possible to see a river named Rio Grande (close to Pedra Branca); this is a very common name for rivers in Brazil, and there are probably hundreds of ‘ Rio Grande’ rivers in the country. As for Represa, this could be any small dam made in that river (e. g., a farmer could make a small dam to have a lake within his property and people will call it Represa). In conclusion, checking old maps and the location of Pedra Branca, it is correct to say that this location is in the municipality of Rio de Janeiro, probably in Jacarepagua, which is a large neighborhood in the west part of the city. In fact, there is a small neighborhood called Rio Grande very close to the possible collection site, which corroborates the hypothesis that this is the area referred to in the label. Unfortunately, no dam could be located in the area, even though some small lakes or ponds can be seen between Pedra Branca and the Rio Grande neighborhood (e. g., https://maps.app.goo.gl/QifF1ixJY53TwQo19).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».