MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6911888706 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13304562

Anomoterga Klyver 1932, stat. rev.

2023· article· en· W6911888706 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueDiatoms and Algae Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBent molecular geometryDorsumPerpendicularTransverse planeFibrous jointThorax (insect anatomy)Apex (geometry)Coronal plane

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Anomoterga Klyver, 1932, stat. rev. Anomoterga Klyver 1932: 93. Type species: Anomoterga tahuata Klyver, 1932, by original designation and monotypy. = Homalocephala Yang and Li 1986: 54. Type species: Homalocephala homali Yang and Li, 1986, by original designation and monotypy. Syn. nov. Diagnosis: Adult. Head, in lateral view, deflexed 45–90° from longitudinal axis of body (Fig. 1A); in dorsal view about as wide as thorax, moderately transverse. Vertex rhomboidal to almost subrectangular; covered in areolate-rugose or imbricate microsculpture, sometimes much reduced on disc; passing smoothly into genae anteriorly; coronal suture fully developed; genae weakly produced ventrally but not enlarged into processes; frons small trapezoidal; median ocellus clearly visible in perpendicular view to vertex; subgenae not differentiated into separate sclerites (Fig. 3C); compound eyes, in dorsal view, hemispherical, adpressed to head. Clypeus pear-shaped, moderate-sized, flattened ventrally, hardly visible in lateral view as it is hidden by genae. Antenna slightly longer than head width; flagellum with simple setae; segment 3 longest, as long as or longer than segments 4–6 together; segments 4, 6, 8, and 9 bearing each a subapical rhinarium lacking marginal spines. Thorax moderately slender; dorsal outline, in lateral view, strongly curved (Fig. 1A). Pronotum, in dorsal view, weakly curved posteriad laterally; propleurites subrectangular, divided by perpendicular suture into subequal epimeron and episternum. Metapostnotum medially flattened, or with blunt tubercle or longitudinal ridge (Fig. 4A). Mesosternum narrower than head, forming transverse band more than three times as wide as long laterally; anterior margin weakly concave; pleurosternal suture hardly visible; basisternum indistinct; katepisternum small antero-laterally, not bent dorsad laterally; angle between arms of precoxale obtuse (Fig. 5A). Pro- and mesotibiae cylindrical. Metacoxa with blunt or subacute horn-shaped meracanthus (Fig. 6A). Metafemur with the three ventral sense organs in the middle; apex with few stout long setae. Metatibia longer than metafemur, slightly widened apically; bearing 9–11 slightly irregularly spaced apical sclerotized spurs and two to five peg-like setae adjacent to inner spurs. Both metatarsal segments relatively short, subequal in length. Forewing oblong-oval or subtrapezoidal; costal and anal margins subparallel or widening towards apex, 2.0–2.4 times as long as wide, membranous or subcoriaceous; vein C + Sc weakly, evenly or irregularly convex, slender, distinctly delimited from cell; costal break developed, sometimes indistinct, close to apex of vein R 1; pterostigma wide, entirely membranous; nodal line developed; veins R and M + Cu subequal; vein Rs almost straight or curved towards costal margin; vein M much longer than its branches; vein Cu 1a almost straight or curved towards anal margin; veins M 1 + 2 and M 3 + 4 perpendicular to wing margin apically; anal break adjacent to apex of vein Cu 1b; surface spinules fine or coarse, spaced or dense, present in all cells. Hindwing slightly shorter than forewing; with one to three costal setae proximal to costal break and two clearly separated groups distal to costal break, of three to five proximal and three to seven distal setae; vein R + M + Cu bifurcating into R and M + Cu. Abdominal base with a weakly sclerotized area on either side covered in spines. Aedeagus with simple proximal portion bearing many weak folds subapically; apex of distal portion not differentiated from stem. Female subgenital plate lacking apical process. Last instar immature. Antenna five to seven segments; lacking sectasetae or lanceolate setae on antennal flagellum. Mid- and hindlegs with massive peg-like setae. Dorsal body surface lacking minute clavate setae. Precaudal abdominal tergites lacking densely spaced simple setae or sectasetae. Anus in ventral position; sometimes with additional pore fields developed. Comments: Supported by one synapomorphy in the morphological analysis (Fig. 11) but paraphyletic in the combined analyses, and paraphyletic (ML-mix) or polyphyletic (ML-part, BI) in the molecular analyses (Fig. 10; Supporting Information, File S4). Burckhardt and Mifsud (2003) synonymized Anomoterga and Homalocephala with Syntomoza but did not include Syntomoza magna, the type species of Syntomoza, in their analysis. Morphology suggests a close relationship of the type species of Anomoterga and Homalocephala with two species originally described in Camarotoscena and transferred by Burckhardt and Mifsud (2003) to Syntomoza. The four species together, however, are only distantly related to, and not congeneric with, S. magna. Similar results are obtained by the molecular and combined analyses, though the type species of Homalocephala was not included. We conclude that Anomoterga and Syntomoza are distinct genera, the latter being monotypic, and Homalocephala is a synonym of Anomoterga. Included available species, distribution, and host plants are summarized in Table 3 and Supporting Information, File S3. The following new or revived combinations are here proposed: Anomoterga africana (Loginova 1975: 55), comb. nov. (from Camarotoscena; Syntomoza, Burckhardt and Mifsud 2003: 16); A. homali (Yang and Li 1986: 54), comb. nov. (Homalocephala; Syntomoza, Burckhardt and Mifsud 2003 16); A. hsenpinensis Fang and Yang 1986: 137, comb. rev. (Syntomoza, Burckhardt and Mifsud 2003: 16); A. scolopiae (Yang 1984: 23), comb. nov. (Syntomoza); A. tahuata Klyver 1932: 94, comb. rev. (from Syntomoza, Burckhardt and Mifsud 2003: 16); A. unicolor (Loginova in Loginova and Parfentiev 1958: 99), comb. nov. (Camarotoscena; Syntomoza, Burckhardt and Mifsud 2003: 17).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,073
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,245

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0040,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0730,062

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetDiatoms and Algae Research→Travaux en français237 207→