MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6911915229 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.14271379

Exophthalmida elytrodon Yunakov, Bollino, Pancini and Anderson 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6911915229 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueCephalopods and Marine Biology
Établissements canadiensCanadian Museum of Nature
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeArthropod mouthpartsTaxonomy (biology)North eastSmall island

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Exophthalmida elytrodon Yunakov, Bollino, Pancini and Anderson sp. nov. (Fig. 1) http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 607A555E-0BA9-4E59-A356-0B200A02B4E7 Material examined Holotype ♀ (CMNC): INDONESIA: North Maluku / Morotai Island, Daeo village / XI.2018; Alim Yasin. Paratypes: 10 ♂, 10 ♀, same data as holotype (CMNC, FCSA, NHMUK, USNM); 13♂ 7♀ (NYC): Indonesia — North Maluku / 7 km North Daeo Majiko Village / (South Morotai—Morotai I.) XII.2019 —m 350-400 / L.A. Yasin —coll. Bollino (one completely dissected female is stored in a plastic tube with alcohol; wing and mouthparts are mounted on microscope slides); 6♂, 6♀ (MBLI): Indonesia — North Maluku / 7 km North Daeo Majiko Village / (South Morotai—Morotai I.) X.2019 —m 350-400 / L.A. Yasin —coll. Bollino; 25♂ 7♀ (MBLI): Indonesia — North Maluku / 7 km North Daeo Majiko Village / (South Morotai—Morotai I.) XII.2019 —m 350-400 / L.A. Yasin —coll. Bollino. 1♂ 1♀ (MSNG): INDONESIA: North Maluku, South Morotai Island / Daeo village / XII.2020 — L.A. Yasin. 1♂ (NHMUK): INDONESIA: North Maluku, South Morotai Island / Daeo village / XII.2020 — L.A. Yasin. 1♂ (LPPC) INDONESIA: North Maluku, South Morotai Island / Daeo village / XII.2020 — L.A. Yasin. Diagnosis This is the largest (BL: 19.07–23.27 mm) species of Exophthalmida, and the only species having long preapical spines on the elytral declivity in females. Remarkably, similar spines are characteristic of other entimines of the Australasian region, i.e. Elytrurus Boisduval, 1835 (Kuschel 2008) and particularly Ottistira Pascoe, 1872 (Riedel & O’Brien 1995). Exophthalmida elytrodon sp. nov. differs from the other known species in fore tarsus with tarsomere 2 strongly transverse (L/W: 0.52–0.68 vs 0.66–0.83 in E. planirostris; 0.75–0.83 in E. glauca); mesanepisternum with broad triangular callosity along mesoventrite; occipital suture linear, without transversal callosity. From Exophthalmida coerulescens Günther, 1938 and Exophthalmida glauca Faust, 1892 it differs by females having basal part of elytral interstriae 3, 5, 7 convex and interstria 9 tuberculate. It resembles E. coerulescens (BL: 13–14mm) in general shape and in the tessellate pattern on the elytra but differs by the flattened pronotal tubercles (raised E. coerulescens); elytra with straight basilateral margins, and punctures on striae mainly united by a thin sulcus; and protibiae only apically curved (in E. coerulescens thinner and more widely curved). It is also similar to E. glauca (BL: 10-13 mm) in the straight basal margin of the elytra directed slightly obliquely towards the scutellum and the humeral calli, but differs from it in having a tessellated pattern on more elongate elytra (EL/EW: 1.59–1.80 vs 1.47 in E. glauca); rostrum with thin median carina (in E. glauca with three carinae); granules on elytral interstriae poorly visible due to dense scales (in E. glauca granules clearly visible and scales sparse); subgenal suture distinct, covered but not concealed by scales. Preostial portion of median lobe longer, endophallus longer, apical ostial valve and lateral valves significantly shorter, median lobe longer and evenly dorso-ventrally arcuate (Fig 4A, B, E). From Exophthalmida planirostris Heller, 1910 (BL: 14–16 mm) it differs in the elytra broadly acuminate; basal margin straight (in E. planirostris narrowly acuminate, and female with basal margin strongly bisinuate), interstriae with one or two rows of minute granules (coarser and irregular in E. planirostris); rostrum moderately elongate (RL/ RW: 1.06–1.20 vs. 1.35–1.50 in E. planirostris), epifrons with thin, flat glabrous carina from the median fovea to frons (in E. planirostris abbreviate, faint, does not reach the frons). From E. laticollis Heller, 1915 (BL: 9.5 mm) the new species differs in having the pronotum with a distinct median longitudinal impression (absent in E. laticollis); epifrons with thin, flat glabrous carina from the median fovea to frons, scape strongly compressed (rostrum tricarinate, and scape slightly compressed in E. laticollis); scutellum subrounded (distinctly transverse as in E. laticollis); interstria 9 with strongly developed tubercles (reduced in E. laticollis). Description Measurements (based on 24 specimens): BL mf: 19.07–23.27 (20.61) mm; BW mf: 7.76–10.02 (8.72) mm; BH mf: 6.10–7.61 (6.87) mm; RL/RW mf: 1.06–1.20 (1.13); VW/ELD mf: 0.51–0.72 (0.63); VW/EfrW mf: 0.40– 0.60 (0.47); RBL: 0.92–1.80 (1.14) mm; PL/PW mf: 0.73–0.89 (0.82); EL/BH mf: 1.94–2.35 (2.15); EL/EW mf: 1.59–1.80 (1.69); EL/PL mf: 3.16–3.98 (3.62); BL/EL mf: 1.36–1.44 (1.40); Wftm1/Wftm2 mf: 0.89–0.97 (0.92); Wftm3/Wftm2 mf: 1.37–1.52 (1.41); Lftm5/Lftm3 mf: 1.20–1.54 (1.38); Whtm1/Whtm2 mf: 0.81-0.98 (0.92); Whtm3/Whtm2 mf: 1.38–1.54 (1.44); Lhtm5/Lhtm3 mf: 1.40–1.59 (1.48); IPW/CCW mf: 1.11–1.35 (1.23); AL/ AW mf: 1.04–1.11 (1.09). Vestiture and Coloration: Integument dark-brown to black. Body, head and legs with vestiture composed of dense, ovate and lanceolate, pale yellowish and brown scales with slight metallic reflection. Scales form a more or less regular tessellated pattern; in females with large transverse pale spot posterior of the middle. Lateral and ventral sides mainly composed of pale yellowish scales, concentrated on metasternum and lateral side of ventrites. Pronotum covered with dense scales that conceal spaces between tubercles, scales concentrated posterolaterally. Mesanepisternum covered with scales, bears large triangular callosity along mesoventrite. Metasternum in males bears long, dense yellowish setae, abdominal sternites 3-7 also with long but less dense pale setae. Head: Head capsule slightly broadly constricted posteriorly of eyes. Vertex narrow [VW/ELD mf: 0.51–0.72 (0.63)], flat, with a distinct elongate median fovea. Gena shorter than or subequal to vertical diameter of eye. Rostrum moderately elongate [RL/RW mf: 1.06–1.20 (1.13)], widened apically; epistome glabrous; frons with scattered scales laterally delimited from epistome by a row of setae; epifrons with thin, flat glabrous carina from the median fovea to frons. Antennal scrobe terminates shortly anteriorly of eye. Occipital suture (ocs) linear, without transversal callosity. Subgenal suture (sgs) distinct, covered but not concealed by scales. Eyes large, sub-rounded, slightly transversely oval. (Fig. 2A–C). Mouthparts: Mandible moderately protruding from buccal cavity; lateral surface bears 5–7 long setae; scar large, round. Maxilla (Fig. 3A) with 9 even long straight lacinial teeth, stipes 1.3x longer than wide, stipes-palpiger joint movable; palpiger bears ~20 setae. Pm1-2 as long as wide, Pm3 1.5x longer than wide with convex sensillar field; ga-se long and dense. Prementim (Fig. 3B) trapezoidal without setae. Labial palpomere 1 enlarged, palpomere 2 abbreviated. Ligula small, not extending beyond anterior margin of prementum. Antennae: Scape straight, strongly compressed (excluding the apex) [maximal width to minimal width ratio: 2.4], which almost reach the apical margin of the pronotum (Fig. 2D). Funicle: funicular segment 2 strongly elongate, remaining segments moniliform: L/W fam1 = 1.57–2.55 (2.01), L/W fam2 = 2.09–2.68 (2.35), L/W fam3 = 0.96– 1.49 (1.20), L/W fam4 = 1.03–1.55 (1.26), L/W fam5 = 0.82–1.45 (1.10), L/W fam6 = 0.94–1.26 (1.13), L/W fam7 = 0.94–1.38 (1.17). Club fusiform [CL/CW = 2.77–3.54 (3.23)], with well-defined antennomeres. (Fig. 2E) Thorax: Pronotum: Slightly transverse [PL/PW mf: 0.73–0.89 (0.82)], with rounded sides, wider in the middle, with very flattened and scattered shiny tubercles, very approximate and fused along the weak, but distinct median longitudinal impression. Metasternum depressed in the middle, with a fairly large fovea before the posterior margin. Scutellum parallel-sided, with rounded posterior margin, 1.5x longer than wide. Elytra: [EL/EW mf: 1.59–1.80 (1.69)], elongate, with humeral calli, parallel-sided in proximal 2/3, broadly acuminate, in female with spiniform process in preapical part interstria 1; basal margin straight, slightly oblique towards scutellum and humeral calli. Ten striae visible, stria 10 reaches metacoxae, thin, with small circular punctures, mainly united by a thin sulcus. Elytral interstriae wide, with one or two irregular rows of minute, weakly convex shiny granules; in males regularly evenly weakly convex; in female basal part of elytral interstriae 3, 5, 7 distinctly convex, interstria 9 with strongly developed tubercles. Metendosternite: Stalk long, narrow; anterior tendons somewhat convergent medially. (Fig. 3C). Metathoracic wings: (Fig. 3D) Fully developed, elongate, 1.8x longer than elytra; 3x longer than wide; crossvein between radial system and medial recurrent broad (rm), heavily sclerotized; branch 2 of Cu (Cu2) separated into two fragments; medial stripe (mst) complete, connected to medial sclerotisation (msc); median branch 1 (M1) distinct. Femora: Edentate, strongly clavate. Tibiae linear with small mucro; protibiae apically curved; metatibiae with a long apical fringe, and corbel closed, lenticular, glabrous, delimited along its inner margin by a fringe of setae, and along outer margin by a row of enlarged tibial surface setae. Tibiae: Bear scattered long pale setae, longer on the inner margin of the protibiae. Metatibial corbel developed, bare. Mucro covered by dense grooming brush. Setal comb of protibia of 16–18 short brown setae not extending beyond lateral margin of tibiae. Tarsi: Large (Fig. 2F), tarsomere 1 triangular (L/W ftm1: 0.96–1.16); 2 strongly transverse (L/W ftm2: 0.52–0.62); 3 broad, deeply bilobate (L/W ftm3: 0.65–0.69); 5 sublinear, slightly wider in the middle (L/W ftm5: 3.58–4.18). Claws free. Abdomen: Intercoxal process somewhat wider than coxal cavity [IPW/CCW mf: 1.11–1.35 (1.23)]. Ventrites finely punctate, slightly elongate [AL/AW mf: 1.04–1.11 (1.09)]; anal ventrite in female subacute, in males obtuse coarsely punctate. (Fig. 2G, H) Male genitalia: Median lobe (Fig. 4A)

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,018
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,035

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,230
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetCephalopods and Marine BiologyTravaux en français237 207