LEGISLATIVE PROVISION OF ADULT EDUCATION IN THE USA AND CANADA: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The article deals with comparative analysis of legislative provision of adult education in the USA and Canada. It was found out that a special attention is paid to adult education development in the USA and Canada, for it is viewed as inevitable element of educational system, important instrument of state support and development of civil democratic society. Common features for both countries are extensive legislative basis, which is distinguished by a great number of laws and acts, which regulate functioning of adult education system. In after-war period the priority in educational policy was giving educational services to soldiers, who came back from war. For this reason, in 1944 G. I. Bill was enacted and in 1946 Law on Employment was enacted, which are viewed as beginning of legislative basis creation. Practical realization of G. I. Bill began after World War II, soldiers were given financial support for obtaining education. This law presupposes obtaining higher education, but financial support was given to those who wanted visited courses aimed at self-development and self-perfection. Important step in reformation of adult education in Canada was state intrusion in reformation of professional and technical education. Before the second half of the XIX century technical education in Canada was provided mainly by institutes of mechanics, which was not enough due to demands of industry. For this reason, Law on technical education was enacted, according to which new colleges and technical educational establishments were created, which were under control of provinces and territories. According to this law all educational establishments must be under control of provinces and territories. At the end of the 60<sup>th</sup> of the XX century Law on professional education was enacted, in which attention is paid to professional education in general and to informal education at workplace with the aim of socio-economic controversies elimination, which are caused by scientific-technical revolution, title to Law on Elementary and Secondary education, which was aimed at illiteracy obliteration. The difference in legislative provision is that taking into account the fact that every state has its own laws, there is a number of federal laws, in particular Adult education law that is in constant renovation, but there is no law at federal level in Canada, but every provision has its own law and directions of adult education development; in 2008 Learn Canada was enacted, which indicates necessity of accessible, diverse and flexible system of adult education, that is able to provide professional and personal development of an adult. Strategical documents in the USA concerning adult education are Law of Investment in Workforce (1998), which is every year enriched by the titles (titles 1999, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2013), which cover formal and informal education. The USA and Canada have stable and effective mechanisms of legislative and financial support and regulation of system of adult education, which should thoroughly analyzed for tracing opportunities of their usage in national space of adult education.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».