MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912363951 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5494740

Training Interfaces for the 2020s

2021· article· en· W6912363951 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Établissements canadiensTrinity College
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTraining (meteorology)Context (archaeology)Session (web analytics)Panel discussionModalitiesConversationApprenticeship

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

<strong>Session Chairs: </strong>Toma Tasovac (DARIAH-EU, Belgrade Center for Digital Humanities), Vicky Garnett (DARIAH-EU, Trinity College Dublin) <strong>Speakers (in alphabetical order): </strong>Ricarda Braukmann (SSHOC, DANS-KNAW), Vicky Garnett (DARIAH-EU), Ellen Leenarts, (SSHOC, DANS-KNAW), Costas Papadopoulos (#dariahTeach/ Maastricht University), Marianne Ping-Huang (#dariahTeach/ Aarhus University), Susan Schreibman (#dariahTeach/ Maastricht University), Toma Tasovac (DARIAH-EU), Tatsiana Yankelevich (SSHOC, LIBER) <strong>Abstract</strong> This panel session will look at the experiences of three emerging and established training initiatives within the Digital Humanities Training sphere. Since 2015, the increase in training resources that address the needs of researchers, particularly in the area of research data management and train-the-trainer materials has grown considerably. Projects launched since the mid-2010s more and more have included training and education as strong components of their mission. Yet with this increase in training, education and skills development, where do these training initiatives see their training materials meeting the future needs of researchers, especially in the context of available interfaces, both for the creation and consumption of learning resources? And crucially, how has the Covid Pandemic changed the modalities of creating and making available learning content? The speakers in this panel will address these issues with a view to initiating a conversation about the development of virtual training interfaces for the 2020s and beyond. <br> <strong>Finessing an interactive user-interface for DARIAH-Campus</strong> <em>Vicky Garnett (DARIAH-EU) </em> <em>Toma Tasovac (DARIAH-EU) </em> DARIAH-Campus was officially launched in December 2019. It was formulated as part of the DESIR project with the intention to provide a sustainable one-stop shop for existing training resources created within the DARIAH community, while also providing original training resources written by and for (digital) humanists at all career stages. One of the crucial elements of design for this platform was the ability for the creators of these resources to upload their content themselves via a GitHub repository, thus giving control of these resources back to the community. This interactive interface has become a unique selling point for DARIAH-Campus, but also a barrier to some users who are less tech-savvy. Focus within the team has shifted therefore to creating, testing and launching a dual-interface to support and enable different editorial workflows: one based on the GitHub workflow allowing direct submissions via GitHub, and a second with a Content Management System built on top of the GitHub workflow, making the process more user-friendly. This presentation will give an overview of the challenges and barriers DARIAH-Campus has faced in developing and finessing its user interface in the nearly 2 years since its launch. <strong>#dariahTeach: Multimodal Interfaces for Student-Centred Teaching/Learning</strong> <em>Costas Papadopoulos</em><em> (#dariahTeach/ Maastricht University)</em> <em>Marianne Ping-Huang (#dariahTeach/ Aarhus University)</em> <em>Susan Schreibman (#dariahTeach/ Maastricht University) </em> This paper focuses on the interfaces developed for #dariahTeach (https://teach.dariah.eu/), the open-source, freely-available online platform for digital arts and humanities curriculum, with a particular focus on the courses that were recently released as part of the project IGNITE: Design Thinking &amp; Making in the Arts and Sciences. These courses, developed specifically for Masters students, took a multimodal approach to course content, utilising videos, audio, timelines, slideshows, and interactive quizzes. They were utilised in both formal postgraduate educational programmes (in the Netherlands and Denmark), as well as in less formal workshops and summer schools during the lockdown. This presentation will discuss the interactive design cycle used to develop these courses, as well as the integration of what are considered more playful learning objects (videos, interactive quizzes) alongside more traditional assignments (e.g. articles and book chapters) for a virtual classroom experience. The presentation will reflect on the lessons learnt through focus groups, interviews, and surveys to utilising #dariahTeach both before and during Covid-induced virtual teaching. <br> <strong>Interfaces to training and engagement for virtual training resources during COVID-19 – SSHOC Case Study</strong> <em>Ellen Leenarts, SSHOC, DANS-KNAW</em> <em>Tatsiana Yankelevich SSHOC, LIBER</em> <em>Ricarda Braukmann SSHOC, DANS-KNAW </em> The Social Sciences and Humanities Open Cloud (SSHOC) project aims to support and raise awareness of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC). Within the project, a team of researchers are tasked with organising training events, and building a training network in Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH), all with the purpose of raising awareness and supporting knowledge exchange in SSH and Open Science. The team has done this through the development of the SSH Training Discovery Toolkit, a curated train-the-trainer focussed collection of materials; and by establishing the SSH Training Community, which brings together more than 150 trainers in the field. They have also established workshops around Research Data Management, engaging virtual training, and evaluation, etc. Here in particular, the global pandemic forced the addition of another interface, as these workshops originally intended for face-to-face delivery were moved to the virtual space. This presentation will discuss the challenges SSHOC has faced in terms of metadata around training resources that are necessary for creating the SSH Training Discovery Toolkit interface, as well as how they overcame the challenges that moving training workshops from the real world to virtual space created. _____ <strong>These presentations were delivered at the DARIAH-EU Annual Event 'Interfaces', September 2021. </strong>

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,946
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,000
Communication savante0,0040,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0420,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,166
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,096 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetDigital Humanities and ScholarshipTravaux en français237 207