MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912408479 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4546073

Penthetria

2021· article· en· W6912408479 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaMargin (machine learning)Allopatric speciationThrowingFish <Actinopterygii>

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Key to the species of New World Penthetria Based on males (eyes holoptic). Females (eyes dichoptic) of some of these species are presently unknown (P. dolichopeza) or indistinguishable. To improve the efficiency of the identification process of specimens from USA and Canada proceed directly to couplet six (though females from USA / Canada are presently indistinguishable, they may be separated with relative confidence based on geographic distribution in areas where species appear to be allopatric (see distribution of species in Maps 2 & 3)). 1 Ventromedian lobes of posterior margin of gonocoxites strongly developed (Fig. 34, 45, vml) with ventromedian cleft often slightly deeper or more narrow in appearance due to stronger flanking lobes (Fig. 34 inset); gonostylus relatively slender in posterior view (Fig. 35) and apically acute; posterior margin of tergite nine with relatively shallow cleft, usually about one-third depth of tergite; tergite nine never deeply emarginate (over one-half length of tergite), shelf-like posteriorly (Fig. 10), or with a field of densely-set, short, black, spine-like setae on posteroventral edge of tergite (Fig. 5, sls); female with tergite nine well developed and strongly lobate posterolaterally (Fig. 54), cerci with second (ultimate) segment relatively short, and posteromedian lobes of sternite eight relatively broad (Fig. 55); South America..................... P. neonigrita Fitzgerald n. sp. - Ventromedian lobes of posterior margin of gonocoxites weakly (Fig. 11, vml) to moderately (Figs. 20 & 25, vml) developed, sometimes entirely absent (Fig. 15); posteromedian cleft usually shallower and broader (Fig. 20, vmc) or entirely absent; gonostylus variable, but not slender in posterior view unless tergite nine deeply emarginate or gonostylus apically notched; tergite nine variable; female terminalia not with the above combination of characters; Canada to Central America.............. 2 2 Gonostylus glossy, shining, with long hairs basally, but only minute sparse hairs beyond base (Figs. 4–6, 9–11); tergite nine with posteromedian emargination deep, extending at least half, but usually more, the length of the tergite (Figs. 4–5, 9) and posteroventral edge bearing a field of densely-set, short, black, spine-like setae sharply contrasting typical setae on remainder of tergite (Fig. 5, sls; can be difficult to see in undissected specimens); tergite nine sometimes shelf-like posteroventrally (Fig. 10); apex of gonostylus broadly rounded (Figs. 9–11) or coming to a narrow rounded point (Fig. 5), never apically truncate or notched (Figs 16–20); females with second (ultimate) segment of cerci elongate and posteromedian lobes of sternite eight relatively narrow (Figs. 46–48); in both sexes vein R 2+3 sometimes with a basal appendix (Fig. 2, ba); Mexico and Central America............................................................................................ 3 - Gonostylus with long hairs basally as well as beyond base (e.g., Figs. 7–8); tergite nine without posteromedian emargination or with emargination more shallow and most often extending one-fifth to one-third the length of the tergite, but sometimes slightly over one-half the length of the tergite; vein R 2+3 without a basal appendix (e.g., Figs. 21, 23); tergite nine never shelf-like or with posteroventral edge with a field of densely-set, short, black, spine-like setae sharply contrasting typical setae on remainder of tergite; gonostylus variable; females with second (ultimate) segment of cerci shorter and posteromedian lobes of sternite eight broader (Figs. 49–53, 56) (females of these species indistinguishable except some by geographic range); widespread...... 4 3 Ninth tergum almost completely divided into two plates by posterior emargination (Fig. 9); posterior, inner (ventral) surface of ninth tergite developed into a pair of broad flat shelves when viewed posteriorly (Fig. 10); gonostylus broad and broadly rounded apically (Figs. 9–11); R 2+3 usually without, but sometimes with a basal appendix; female with sternite ten truncate/broadly rounded posteriorly? (as in Fig. 49; sternite 10 not visible in Fig. 48 as it is partly telescoped within preceding segments) (but see notes on this character in “Remarks” under P. appendicula).................................. P. distincta Hardy - Ninth tergum not so deeply cleft (Fig. 4); posterior, inner (ventral) surface of ninth tergite not developed (or at most only very weakly developed) into a pair of broad flat shelves when viewed posteriorly (Fig. 5); gonostylus not as broad (Fig. 5); R 2+3 usually, but not always, with a basal appendix (Fig. 2); female (Fig. 3) with sternite ten tapered posteriorly to a rounded point? (Fig. 47) (but see notes on this character in “Remarks”)..................................... P. appendicula Hardy 4 Hind basitarsus, parallel-sided, very slender elongate (hind tibia only about 2.5 times as long as basitarsus; Fig. 12, hb); gonostylus short and stout with a distinct anteroapical thorn (Figs. 14–15); gonocoxite dorsally with an apical, medially-directed lobe just anterior to the gonostylar socket (Fig. 14, dal); ventromedian lobes of gonocoxites absent (Fig. 15); southern Mexico, Costa Rica ................................................................. P. dolichopeza Fitzgerald n. sp. - Hind basitarsus usually robust to slightly swollen and sausage-shaped, sometimes more slender, but never slender and greatly elongated (Figs. 23, 30–31, hb); gonostylus not as above; gonocoxite dorsally without an apical medially-directed lobe just anterior to the gonostylar socket; ventromedian lobes of gonocoxites variable; widespread........................... 5 5 In dorsal and ventral views, divergent horn-like lobes of paramere more strongly projecting caudally and ventrally, often appearing apical (even though really more subapical in position) (Figs. 24–26, dlp), sometimes divergent lobes slightly less projecting (Figs. 28–29) making them barely visible or barely not visible in a strictly dorsal view, but in the latter case at least apex (most posterior aspect) of paramere slightly laterally compressed into a ridge so that apex appears more narrow (as an apical nubbin) in dorsal view rather than broadly rounded (Fig. 29); apex of gonostylus (Figs. 24–26, 28–29) usually broadly rounded or broadly rounded and culminating in an obtuse point medially, sometimes apically slightly truncate, but never with an apical notch; tergite nine uncleft or relatively shallowly cleft (up to about one-third its length) (Fig. 24); Mexico and Central America............................................................................ P. mexicana (Hardy) - Divergent horn-like lobes of paramere not visible in dorsal view. In ventral view, divergent horn-like lobes less developed, not strongly projecting or appearing apical, but more collar-like and more confluent with posteroventral edge of paramere (Figs. 8 & 20, dlp); apex (most posterior aspect) of paramere rounded, dome-like in dorsal view, not laterally compressed into a narrow ridge/nubbin, and often with a minute notch (Figs. 7 & as in 16 & 20, p); gonostylus variable; Canada to Central America.. 6 6 Apex of gonostylus minutely truncate or with a small notch (the anterodorsal side of the notch often developed into a small point) (Figs. 16–20, 36–39); Canada, northwestern USA and USA east of the Rocky Mountains....................... 7 - Gonostylus apically broadly rounded or broadly rounded and culminating in an obtuse median point (Figs. 7–8) or, in some Mexican and Central American specimens gonostylus very slightly truncate apically (as in Fig. 19); Southern Arizona, USA south to Central America....................................................... P. arizonensis Fitzgerald n. sp. 7 In posterior view, gonostylus more robust (Fig. 40); in dorsal view, paramere more broadly rounded, less diamond-shaped (Fig. 38, p); USA & Canada east of the Rocky Mountains.......................................... P. heteroptera (Say) - In posterior view, gonostylus more slender (Fig. 41); in dorsal view, paramere more diamond-shaped (Fig. 39, p); northwestern USA, widespread in Canada ........................................................ P. yakima Fitzgerald n. sp.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,629
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,219 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetPlanarian Biology and ElectrostimulationTravaux en français237 207