Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Phantasca puppeia (Westwood, 1859) Figs 78–81 Phasma puppeius Westwood, 1859: 125, pl. 10, fig. 1 (♂). Cladoxerus puppeius – Kirby 1904: 358. Phantasca puppeia – Redtenbacher 1906: 111. — Zompro 2001: 223. — Otte & Brock 2005: 264. — Brock, Marshall, Beccaloni & Harman 2016: 190. Material examined Holotype BRAZIL: ♂, “Braz. Tapajos, 53 27; Type; Puppeius Westw.; Phasma puppeius Westw.; Cladoxerus puppeius; BMNH(E) #844549 ” (NHMUK). Diagnosis Males (the only sex known) are similar to those of P. montana (Redtenbacher, 1908) from eastern Peru but differ by the somewhat more elongate body and legs, slightly longer cerci, larger and apically broadly rounded poculum, lack of distinctive markings on the head and pronotum, plain green tegmina and costal region of the alae as well as the unicoloured anal segment. The colouration resembles that of P. ruboligata sp. nov., but the genital morphology (e.g., more slender abdominal tergum IX and straight cerci) readily distinguishes P. puppeia from this species. Description Male (Fig. 78) BODY. Size very small (body length 46.1 mm, Table 10); form very slender and delicate. Body surface entirely smooth. COLOUR. The colour of the unique holotype buff, with a pale greenish wash (almost certainly green when alive). Tegmina and costal region of alae pale green, anal region of alae hyaline, with the central longitudinal veins black at the base and the anterior longitudinal veins black at the apex (Fig. 78). Mesonotum, with a few small brownish speckles. Abdominal tergites VIII and IX each, with two longitudinal blackish markings, those on IX longer and forming two sub-parallel stripes. Apex of all femora, tibiae and basitarsi mid brown; the extreme apex of femora and tibiae reddish (believed to be bright red when alive). HEAD. Ovoid, somewhat longer than wide, broadest at the eyes, considerably broader than prothorax, the vertex smooth and gently convex; unicoloured (Fig. 79). Eyes large, projecting hemispherically and their length contained only about 1.5× in that of cheeks. Antennae about as long as body (according to Westwood 1859: 126). THORAX. Pronotum roundly rectangulate, about 1.3× as long as wide and with a shallow, curved transverse median sulcus. Mesothorax very slender and elongate, some 3× as long as head and pronotum combined. Mesonotum very weakly tectinate longitudinally. Tegmina small, elongate-oval, gradually narrowed towards the base, with the apical portion widest and obtusely rounded; hardly reaching base of alae. Alae reaching about half way along abdominal segment V. ABDOMEN. Median segment 2× as long as metanotum. Segment IV longest and 5× as long as wide; III–VI gradually decreasing in length. VII much shorter than preceding and constricted medially. Tergum VIII slightly widening towards the posterior and fully separated from sternum VIII. IX some 1.3× as long as VIII, distinctly constricted medially, the lateral margins gently deflexed and rounded in the posterior half and clearly separated. Anal segment much shorter than all preceding, subquadrate, somewhat narrowed posteriorly and the posterior margin, with a well decided, rounded median emargination (Fig. 80); the outer posterior angles obtusely angular and with a few very minute teeth ventrally. Vomer broad, scalelike and almost semi-circular in shape. Poculum tub-shaped, with the posterior margin entire, obtusely rounded and reaching about ⅓ along anal segment. Cerci cylindrical, almost straight, about ¾ the length of anal segment and distinctly projecting beyond its posterior margin (Figs 80–81). LEGS. All very long and slender, the profemora decidedly longer than the combined length of head, pro- and mesothorax, the mesofemora a little longer than mesothorax and the hind legs distinctly projecting beyond apex of abdomen. Pro- and metabasitarsus very elongate and considerably longer than remaining tarsomeres combined. Remarks Only known from the unique male holotype, which has suffered some damage since its original description by Westwood in 1859. Both antennae, the right front leg, left mid leg and the mesotarsi are missing. Distribution North East Brazil: Pará State, Rio Tapajós (NHMUK).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».