MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912440154 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4337955

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) minckleyi Gardner & Gibbs 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6912440154 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueFern and Epiphyte Biology
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMargin (machine learning)Taxonomy (biology)Chirality (physics)Life history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) minckleyi sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 3197BF55-611C-4EE4-BC8B-4E133355826C Figs 3A, 64–66, 90J, 98B, 107B Diagnosis Females of Lasioglossum minckleyi sp. nov. can be recognized by the face short (length/width ratio ~0.8), frons and mesepisternum with coarse and crowded punctures (i =0 pd), clypeus with distinct apicolateral denticles, T1 anterior surface corarious, T2–4 with dark spiracular spots, metasomal terga lacking tomentum, and mesoscutum broad (length/width ratio usually ≤ 0.8). They are most similar to L. mesillense and L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. Both of these species usually have the frons and mesepisternum with finer or distinctly separated punctures at least in part, T1 anterior surface shiny, and metasomal terga with basolateral tomentum. Occasional specimens of L. mesillense lack some of these diagnostic characters, and are very difficult to distinguish from L. minckleyi sp. nov. Females of L. mesillense also have the mesoscutum longer (length/width ratio usually ± 0.84); this and the frons punctation seem to be the most reliable diagnostic characters. Males of L. minckleyi sp. nov. can be recognized by the face short (length/width ratio ~0.83) and covered in moderately dense tomentum below the ocelli, flagellomeres relatively short (F2 about 1.6 times as long as F1 and 1.25 times as long as broad), mesepisternum punctures dense (i <1 pd), metasomal terga lacking tomentum, T1–3 rims punctate basally, and clypeus apical margin and labrum usually orange. They are most similar to L. mesillense, L. austerum sp. nov., and L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. Males of L. mesillense have the flagellomeres relatively long (F2 about 2 times as long as F1 and 1.6 times as long as broad), mesepisternum more sparsely punctate (i= 1–2 pd), and metasomal terga sometimes with basolateral tomentum. Males of L. austerum sp. nov. have the face below ocelli covered in sparser tomentum and mesepisternum more sparsely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd). Males of L. imbriumbrae sp. nov. have T1–3 rims impunctate and clypeus apical margin and labrum reddish brown to black. Etymology The specific epithet minckleyi is a dedication to Robert L. Minckley (University of Rochester), who collected the vast majority of currently known specimens. An appropriate translation would be Minckley’s sweat bee. Material examined Holotype MEXICO – Sonora • ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, 28 km E of Agua Prieta, Hay Hollow riparian site; [31.31° N, 109.25° W]; 25 Aug. 2000; R. Minckley and A. Romero leg.; PCYU. [Verbatim label: MEXICO: Sonora, Rancho San Bernardino,28kmE Agua Prieta 25Aug2000 Hay Hollow riparian Site / R Minckley, A Romero / ex. blue pan trap 003025 // 1849C01 // HOLOTYPE / Lasioglossum (Dialictus) minckleyi Gardner and Gibbs] Paratypes MEXICO – Sonora • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3217° N, 109.2583° W; 25 Jul. 2000; R. Minckley leg.; PCYU • 2 ♀♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3097° N, 109.2542° W; 19 Aug. 2003; A. Nelson leg.; PCYU • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.3322° N, 109.2703° W; 3 Aug. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Agua Prieta; 31.31° N, 109.2778° W; 11 Sep. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho Puerta Blanca, Pollination Site 26, Opuntia, Bulldozer, Rancho Puerta Blanca; 31.32222° N, 109.07972° W; 24 May 2008; ex Opuntia engelmannii; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino; 31.31° N, 109.2536° W; 25 Aug. 2001; R. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, 28 km E of Agua Prieta, cienega transect; [31.31° N, 109.25° W]; 27 Jul. 2000; K. Toal leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; PCYU • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque dry, Site 4; 31.30972° N, 109.27778° W; 19 Aug. 2003; RLM • 3 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque wet, Site 1; 31.33194° N, 109.27083° W; 10 Aug. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque wet, Site 6, Transect 3; 31.32957° N, 109.25462° W; 27 Jul. 2007; RLM • 3 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque wet, Site 7; 31.30972° N, 109.25417° W; 19 Aug. 2003; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Bosque wet, Site 7, Transect 2; 31.31007° N, 109.25348° W; 26 Jul. 2000; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 12 Aug. 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Cienega house; 31.33098° N, 109.2676° W; 1 Apr. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, field, Site 3, Transect 3; 31.32222° N, 109.27722° W; 12 Aug. 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, grassland, Site 3; 31.30222° N, 109.26694° W; 12 Aug. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Pollination Site 21, Sphaeralcea, Pond 100 m E of main gate; 31.31583° N, 109.26861° W; 8 Aug. 2006; ex Lycium andersonii; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 18 Aug. 2006; ex Larrea tridentata; RLM • 3 ♀♀, 1 ♂; same location as for preceding; 10 Aug. 2007; ex Sphaeralcea laxa; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Pollination Site 22, Sphaeralcea, field 3; 31.32222° N, 109.27778° W; 6 Aug. 2006; ex Argemone pleiacantha; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Pollination Site 27, Horse Corral, 70 m N of main ranch house; 31.32556° N, 109.26667° W; 9 Sep. 2007; ex Sphaeralcea laxa; RLM • 8 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, quarry, gravel pit; 31.31964° N, 109.26926° W; 19 Aug. 2003; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, roadside E of quarry; 31.31996° N, 109.26848° W; 19 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, roadside W of quarry; 31.31948° N, 109.2701° W; 18 Aug. 2003; RLM • 3 ♀♀; same location as for preceding; 19 Aug. 2003; RLM • 3 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Riparian, Site 1, Transect 1; 31.33347° N, 109.2601° W; 16 Aug. 2000; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 10 Aug. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 22 Jul. 2007; RLM • 1 ♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Riparian, Site 2; 31.33194° N, 109.25833° W; 20 Aug. 2003; ex Baccharis sarothroides; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 20 Aug. 2003; RLM • 4 ♀♀; Rancho San Bernardino, Riparian, Site 4; 31.32972° N, 109.25583° W; 20 Aug. 2003; RLM. UNITED STATES – Arizona • 1 ♂; Cochise Co., Benson; [31.97° N, 110.29° W]; 1091 m a.s.l.; 14– 15 Sep. 1974; E.G. and J.M. Linsley leg.; ex Helianthus annuus; CUIC • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge, Black Draw, Riparian Site 2; [31.34° N, 109.26° W]; 16 Aug. 2000; K. Toal leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR; 31.3344° N, 109.2681° W; 3 Aug. 2001; R.L. Minckley leg.; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR; [31.34° N, 109.26° W]; 27 Aug. 2001; R. Minckley leg.; RLM • 4 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque dry, Site 7; 31.34118° N, 109.25813° W; 6 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque dry, Site 7, Transect 2; 31.34168° N, 109.25825° W; 30 Jul. 2004; RLM • 5 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 2; 31.33633° N, 109.2673° W; 7 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 2, Transect 2; 31.33627° N, 109.26752° W; 31 Jul. 2004; RLM • 4 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 3; 31.33517° N, 109.26653° W; 7 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 3, Transect 2; 31.33527° N, 109.2668° W; 11 Oct. 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 15 Aug. 2005; RLM • 8 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 4; 31.334° N, 109.2372° W; 5 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Bosque wet, Site 4, Transect 1; 31.33693° N, 109.24361° W; 26 Jul. 2007; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, nr Bathroom, Bee Diversity; 31.3411° N, 109.27048° W; 15 Oct. 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, Site 5, Transect 3; 31.33417° N, 109.26778° W; 27 Jul. 2007; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, Site 6; 31.33867° N, 109.2719° W; 8 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, Site 6, Transect 1; 31.33417° N, 109.26833° W; 11 Aug. 2005; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, Site 6, Transect 4; 31.33444° N, 109.26806° W; 3 Jul. 2002; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, field, Site 8; 31.33765° N, 109.26068° W; 6 Aug. 2003; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 6 Apr. 2006; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 2, Transect 3; 31.3358° N, 109.2702° W; 27 Jul. 2007; RLM • 3 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 4; 31.33495° N, 109.25314° W; 5 Aug. 2003; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 4, Transect 1; 31.33487° N, 109.2529° W; 26 Jul. 2007; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 5; 31.33683° N, 109.25308° W; 5 Aug. 2003; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 5, Transect 4; 31.3385° N, 109.25308° W; 26 Jul. 2007; RLM • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Grassland, Site 8; 31.34254° N, 109.27449° W; 12 May 2006; RLM • 2 ♀♀; Cochise Co., San Bernardino NWR, Mesa de la Avanzada, Bee diversity; 31.34147° N, 109.27278° W; 15 Aug. 2002; RLM • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 15 Oct. 2002; RLM • 1 ♂; Pima Co., Greaterville Rd.; 31.7864° N, 110.8231° W; 1320 m a.s.l.; 8 Jul. 2010; Yanega leg.; ex Condalia; UCRC • 1 ♀; Pinal Co., 8 km SE of San Manuel; 32.5974° N, 110.5388° W; 15 Apr. 2014; R.G. Laport leg.; ex Larrea tridentata; RLM • 1 ♀; Yavapai Co., Montezuma Castle; [34.61° N, 111.84° W]; 25 Jun. 1973; H. Nagase leg.; LACM • 1 ♀; 30 km E of Douglas; 31.3383° N, 109.2683° W; 3 Sep. 2000; R. Minckley leg.; ex Baccharis sarothroides; RLM • 1 ♂; 6 mi. SE of Patagonia; [31.48° N, 110.83° W]; 26 Jul. 1962; Werner, Bequaert and Noller leg.; ex Condalia lycioides and Baccharis salicina; CUIC • 1 ♂; Arivaca; [31.58° N, 111.33° W]; 12 Jul. 1940; R.H. Beamer leg.; SEMC • 1 ♂; Tucson; [32.22° N, 110.97° W]; 14 Jul. 1950; J.G. Rozen leg.; SEMC. – New Mexico • 1 ♂; Luna Co., 32 km E of Deming; [32.27° N, 107.42° W]; 1300 m a.s.l.; 7 Aug. 1998; R. Minckley and K. Toal leg.; RLM. Description Female COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue-green to golden-green; clypeus apical colour black, reddish brown, or orange; labrum reddish brown to orange; mandible oran

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,030
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,059

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,217
Écart entre enseignants0,174 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetFern and Epiphyte BiologyTravaux en français237 207