MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912498672 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3791328

Scelio masneri Yoder & Polaszek & Masner & Johnson & Valerio 2009, sp. n.

2009· article· en· W6912498672 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Établissements canadiensAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSculptureSulcusGroove (engineering)Mandible (arthropod mouthpart)Dorsum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Scelio masneri Yoder, sp. n. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 9CB8FEB6-2DAA-40AA-95EA-18492ACC7EA3 urn:lsid:biosci.ohio-state.edu:osuc_concepts:238056 Figs 61–66; Morphbank 20 Description. Female body length: 3.18–3.78 mm (n=2). Color of antenna in female: A1–2 yellow to light brown, remaining brown. Color of head in female: metallic green to dark teal. Color of mesosoma in female: yellow orange. Color of coxae in female: yellow to light brown. Color of leg past coxa in female: yellow to light brown. Color of metasoma in female: amber-orange at base (T1–T3), darkening to near black at apex, T4–T6 with metallic blue-green sheen. Sculpture of lower frons in female: predominantly fine irregular rugulae. Sculpture of ventrolateral frons in female: dense fine rugulae. Form of malar sulcus in female: sulcus percurrent, slit, groove or carina extremely narrow but course well defined. Sculpture of upper frons of female: fine rugulae. Sculpture of dorsal head between and posterior to lateral ocelli in female: fine rugulae. Mandible of female: upper tooth slightly elongate, elongate-triangular, lower tooth absent to almost imperceptible, a slight extension of the inner-ventral margin. Transverse pronotal carina in female: absent mesad, transition from dorsal shoulder to anterior pronotum not sharply delimited but rather slightly curved, if appearing slightly present then either obliterated medially or composed of adjacent subpolygonal sculpture. Sculpture of medial mesoscutum in female: serpentine, sharply defined, rugulae relatively dense. Sculpture of notaular course in female: more or less undifferentiated to slightly more robust and coarse relative to medial sculpture. Sculpture of lateral mesoscutum in female: present. Sculpture of mesoscutellum in female: serpentine-rugulose, sculpture narrow, sharply defined. Sculpture of lateral pronotum in female (excluding interstitial sculpture): reticulate sculpture throughout (smooth patch below lateral epomial carina ab- Figures 6Ι – 66 .59 Scelio masneri sp. n. (OSUC 235076). 6Ι Habitus, dorsal view 62 Habitus, lateral view 63 Mesosoma, dorsal view 64 Mesosoma, lateral view 65 Head, anterior view 66 Metasoma, dorsal view. Scale bars in millimeters. sent). Pronotal verricule in female: small bump with 1–2 very short setae at cent- er. Pronotal setal patch posteroventral to end of lateral epomial carina in female: very sparse (around 1–3), long, erect setae. Sculpture of mesopleural depression in female: predominantly longitudinally striate. Pilosity of anteroventral metapleuron in female: dense patch of semi-decumbent to erect setae. Dorsal surface of hind tibia in female: sparse, elongate, erect and slightly curved. Shape of hind femur in female: narrow, dorsal and ventral surfaces relatively symmetrical. Basal pigmented spot of fore wing in female: percurrent from submarginal vein to posterior margin, striplike (a band), divided only by hyaline course of M+Cu. Basal fascia of fore wing in female: subrectangular, striplike, percurrent from anterior to posterior margin. Apical fascia of fore wing in female: broad, hyaline, percurrent from anterior to posterior fore wing margin, apex of fore wing past fascia concolorous with distal patch. Sculpture of dorsal T 1 in female: longitudinally striate, with few to no transverse divisions or reticulations, interstices smooth or with very slight irregular microsculpture. Sculpture of dorsal T 2 in female: fine longitudinal striae with interstices smooth. Sculpture of anterior T2 through anterior depression in female: interrupted with by a smooth strip, majority of sculpture not contiguous with that of posterior T2. Sculpture of dorsal T 3 in female: fine parallel to irregular longitudinal striae, with reticulation absent to moderately present. Medial sculpture of T 4 in female: present. Medial sculpture of T 5 in female: present, obliterated to smooth. Sculpture of T2–T5 curved transition from dorsal to lateral terga in female: sculptured. Profile of female metasoma in lateral view: ventral surface more or less flat, dorsal surface weakly to strongly arched from T2–T6 highest point between T4–T5, evenly curved to T6. Sculpture of lateral T2–T 6 in female: T2 reticulate-rugulose, T3–T6 with dense striae throughout. Pilosity of laterotergites in female: present on T1–T4. Diagnosis. Easily diagnosed from all other species by the metallic green head in combination with bright orange mesosoma that bears dense, erect, long white pilosity. Etymology. In honor of Lubomír Masner as recognition of his contributions to Hymenoptera taxonomy. Link to distribution map. [http://osuc.biosci.ohio-state.edu/HymOnline/maplarge.html?id=238056] Material examined. Holotype female: SOUTH AFRICA: South Africa, Limpopo Prov., 30 km E Nylstroom, 15.XI–17.XII.1984, flight intercept trap, H. Howden & A. Howden, OSUC 235076 (deposited in CNCI). Paratype: BOTSWANA: 1 female, OSUC 235079 (CNCI). Comments. Scelio masneri is the most aberrant member of the pulchripennis - group. Th e very long and dense white pilosity, highly domed metasoma, and metallic head and orange body are all potential apomorpohies. Th e upper lateral pronotum is notable for the complete absence of a smoother patch. It is hard to discern the setae on the laterotergite of T 1 in the two specimens observed: in both it appears that some setae have been lost. Additional specimens are required to confirm the coding of this state.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,033
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,109

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0330,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,054
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetFish Biology and Ecology StudiesTravaux en français237 207