MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912507190 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4558814

Okanagrion beardi Archibald & Cannings & Erickson & Bybee & Mathewes 2021, new species

2021· article· en· W6912507190 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueDiatoms and Algae Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésParatypeMargin (machine learning)WingHolotype

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Okanagrion beardi Archibald & Cannings, new species Figs. 21–22. Diagnosis. Wings separated from those of all other Okanagrion species but O. dorrellae by MP, CuA distinctly divergent near margin [others: MP-CuA space remaining narrow; O. dorrellae: widening, but less distinctly as CuA zigzagged distally (O. angustum, not known)]; from all others except O. angustum by IR2 originating on RP1-2 [others: between RP1-2, RP3-4]; from O. angustum by Ax1 to nodus shorter, 6.5 mm (holotype; paratype 1: almost 6 mm, smaller wing, but proportions match holotype) [O. angustum: 7.5 mm]; from O. dorrellae by MP linear to margin [O. dorrellae: zigzagged near margin]; from O. liquetoalatum, O. dorrellae by wing shape: length (arculus to apex) / maximum width 3.1 [O. liquetoalatum: 2.6; O. dorrellae 3.7; others similar to O. beardi (O. lochmum, O. worleyae, O. angustum not comparable by preservation)]. Further separated by colouration (sex unknown): proximal approx. 2/5 hyaline, dark apical to this except narrow lighter fascia just distal to mid-way between nodus, pterostigma, extending from anterior margin to close to posterior margin; size and extent of light fascia differs from: O. hobani about twice or more as wide, extending to or almost to posterior margin; O. angustum apparently similar to O. hobani as preserved; O. threadgillae notably narrower, extending to mid-wing; O. dorrellae similar width, probably extending to mid-wing (but damage in this region); O. lochmum, similar to O. beardi; O. liquetoalatum: hyaline throughout; O. worleyae: lightly infuscate throughout known wing. Type material. Holotype: F-791 (part only) (Fig. 21): One complete wing and portions of two or three others; possibly part of one eye; part of damaged thorax preserved in lateral aspect; at least two pieces of abdomen present; collected at the McAbee Hoodoo Face beds, collector and date unknown; housed in the Thompson Rivers University collections. Paratype 1: RBCM P1546 (Fig. 22): a head, thorax, bits of some legs, proximal-most portion of the abdomen, well-preserved forewing and proximal portion of a hind wing; coated with shellac; collected at the McAbee Hoodoo Face beds, vi.1998 by unknown grade 8 or 9 student, donated by Graham Beard; in the Royal British Columbia Museum collections. Description. Holotype, F-791, forewing. Almost complete, missing tiny portions of the apex and proximal to the nodus. Shape: oval distal to nodus, symmetrical from lateral mid-line; length: 31.5 mm, arculus to apex: about 27.7 mm, nodus to apex: about 22.7 mm, origin of RP2 to apex: 18.2 mm, arculus to base of pterostigma: 22.0 mm, nodus to base of pterostigma: 16.8 mm, nodus at 29% wing length; width 8.3 mm. Colouration as in diagnosis. Pterostigma anterior, posterior margins oblique, 3.5 times longer than wide, subtends 6.5 cells, no oblique brace vein. 35 crossveins in postnodal space (complete), none hyperstigmal, crossveins in postsubnodal space not aligned. Maximum three cells wide distal to pterostigma in costal space (partially preserved). RA–RP1 space narrows near margin. RP1–IR1 space becomes two cells wide unknown number of cells from origin by preservation. IR1 origin eight cells distal to origin of RP2. IR1–RP2 space becomes two cells wide unknown number of cells origin by preservation. RP2 origin six cells distal to origin of IR2. IR2 origin very close to subnodus; close to, appears to arise from RP1-2. RP3-4 origin about 2/3 from arculus to nodus. Ax0 present. Arculus close to, immediately proximal to Ax2. No crossvein O. All main veins linear other than IR1 proximally. MP, CuA divergent at terminus on posterior margin. CuA–A space with maximum five cells wide. Paratype 1, RBCM P1546. Head (Fig. 10 M, Table 1): relatively well preserved in dorsal aspect but details obscure; labrum/clypeus area damaged. In dorsal view about 4.1 mm across eyes at widest part, with rear margin expanded somewhat postero-laterally; approximate length from anterior edge of antefrons to posterior of occiput 1.5 mm; at level of hind ocelli distance between eyes about 1.2 mm, single eye roughly 1.5 mm wide, 2.0 mm long. Thorax: lateral view; colouration dark, apparently with narrow pale stripe on mesopleural suture, any other patterns obscure; pieces of legs poorly preserved. Forewing: as in holotype except length: 31.6 mm, arculus to apex: 26.5 mm, nodus to apex: 21.7 mm, origin of RP2 to apex: 16.6 mm, arculus to base of pterostigma: 21.0 mm, nodus to base of pterostigma: 16.2 mm; width 7.7 mm; nodus at 25% wing length. Colouration mostly obscured by applied shellac, but as apparent is consistent with holotype. Pterostigma: 5.5 cells subtend, length 3.5 times width. Postnodal space with 36 crossveins (probably complete), distal-most one hyperstigmal. IR1 origin seven cells distal to origin of RP2; IR1– RP2 space becomes two cells wide six or seven cells (unclear by preservation) distal to origin by preservation. RP2 origin nine cells distal to origin of IR2. Ax0 not detected. CuA–A space unknown number of cells wide by preservation, but appears similarly wide as holotype. Abdomen: segments 1 and 2 preserved in lateral aspect; base of abdomen relatively slender; irregular ventral margin of segment 2 may indicate presence of secondary male genitalia but sex of specimen undetermined. Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronymic formed from the surname of Graham Beard, the donor of paratype 1, recognising his contribution. Range and age. McAbee, BC, Canada; mid-Ypresian.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,053

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,243
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetDiatoms and Algae ResearchTravaux en français237 207