Paraphronima crassipes Claus 1879
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Paraphronima crassipes Claus (Figs 37 & 38) Hyperia pedestris GuérinMéneville, 1836: pl. 25, fig. 5. Paraphronima crassipes Claus, 1879: 7 (65)–8(66), pl. 1, figs 6–9; pl. 2, fig. 10. Paraphronima clypeata Bovallius, 1885: 11, fig. 2. Paraphronima pectinata Bovallius, 1887a: 13–14. Paraphronima cuivis Stebbing, 1888: 1337–1342, pl. 157. Type material Type material of P. crassipes could not be found at the ZMB or ZMH and is considered lost. However, the description and figures provided by Claus (1879) are sufficient to characterise this species. The type locality is the “Mediterranean”. No specific locality is given by Claus (1879). Type material of synonyms The holotype of Hyperia pedestris is in the ANSP (CA 2698, GuérinMéneville Coll. No. 432) (see remarks). Four syntypes of P. clypeata are in the ZMUC (CRU 449–452). Although this material is only in fair condition it is clearly conspecific with P. crassipes. Two syntypes of P. pectinata are in the ZMUC (CRU 447 & 448). Both specimens are in good condition and readily identified as P. crassipes. Bovallius (1889) considers it a synonym of P. clypeata. Syntype material of P. cuivis is in the BMNH (89.5.15.200). These specimens represent both P. crassipes and P. gracilis. However, the material described and illustrated by Stebbing (1888) represent P. crassipes. Material examined (> 250 specimens) Types. Holotype of Hyperia pedestris from the coast off Chile: dried specimen in vial — almost destroyed. Four syntypes of P. clypeata from the North Atlantic; one male (CRU 449, 14 mm) captured 39º10’N, 42º10’W, Andrea, 1863; one female (CRU 450, 11.2 mm) captured 30º34’N, 30º50’W, Andrea, 1862; one female (CRU 451, 14 mm) captured 36º06’N, 39º 28’W, “Warming”, 1866; one female (CRU 452, 10.4 mm) captured 26ºN, 26ºW, “Iversen”, 1871: all in spirit. Two syntypes of P. pectinata from the North Atlantic; one female (CRU 451, 14 mm) captured 36º06’N, 39º28’W, “Warming”, 1866; one female (CRU 452, 10.4 mm) captured 26ºN, 26ºW, “Iversen”, 1871: in spirit, the latter one with mouthparts and A2 missing. Several syntypes of P. cuivis from between Japan and Honolulu, 35ºN, surface, Challenger, July, 1875: several specimens in spirit and 8 microscope slides. Other material examined. Tasman Sea: 16 lots (SAMA), 19 specimens. North Atlantic: 7 lots (BMNH), 7 lots (CMN), 22 lots (USNM), 3 lots (ZMB), several lots (ZMUC), numerous specimens. South Atlantic: 11 lots (BMNH), 24 specimens. North Pacific: 2 lots (CMN), several lots (LACM), 26 lots (USNM), numerous specimens. South Pacific: 1 lot (ZMB), 1 specimen. Indian: 1 lot (BMNH), 4 specimens. Mediterranean: 1 lot (BMNH), 2 specimens. Arabian Sea: 3 lots (BMNH), 3 specimens. Central IndoPacific: 3 lots (USNM), 3 specimens. Diagnosis Body length up to 31 mm, but usually 20–24 mm. Head slightly longer than deep. Pereonites 1–4 about equal in width. Pereopods 5–7; anterior margin of ischium to propodus with few or no robust setae. Pereopod 7 only slightly shorter than P6. Pleonite 1; ventral margin of epimeral plate evenly rounded, almost perpendicular to body axis anteriorly. Remarks The similarity of this species to the previous one has already been discussed under that species. The recent discovery of the type of Hyperia pedestris GuérinMéneville, 1836, and that it is most likely P. crassipes (Zeidler 1997), posed the problem of whether or not GuérinMéneville’s specific name should be used for the species now known as P. crassipes. However, its replacement would create nomenclatural instability (Zeidler 1995), because P. crassipes, as a scientific name, is well established in the scientific literature, and the type of H. pedestris is in very poor condition making specific identity uncertain, and it is a name that has not been used since Bovallius (1889). The proposal to conserve the specific name (Zeidler 1995) was subsequently upheld by the ICZN (1997). Paraphronima crassipes has been recorded as an associate of the siphonophores Dyphies and Galeolaria (Lo Bianco 1909) and Rosacea cymbiformis (Harbison et al. 1977, Laval 1980). Distribution This species is widely distributed in tropical and temperate regions including the Mediterranean Sea. In the southern Hemisphere it rarely penetrates up to the Antarctic Convergence (Vinogradov et al. 1982).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».