MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912562207 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6247688

Acmaeodera consors Horn 1878

2007· article· en· W6912562207 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRange (aeronautics)French hornFront (military)Variation (astronomy)Margin (machine learning)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Acmaeodera consors Horn, 1878. Acmaeodera consors Horn, 1878:20. Acmaeodera montezuma Obenberger, 1924:35. New synonymy Acmaeodera perforata Cazier, 1940:17. New synonymy Barr (1975) discussed A. montezuma and considered it “very closely related” to A. perforata. He separated them by differences he observed on the front of the head, front margin of the prosternum, and subapical development of the last visible abdominal ventrite. I have examined and compared the unique holotypes of those species and A. consors, plus two additional specimens determined as the latter species. Despite the considerable range in size, all specimens easily fit into a normal range of variation that can be observed in many species of Acmaeodera; therefore, I find all three species conspecific. The elytral pattern and punctation are similar. The variation in structure of the last visible abdominal ventrite likely is attributable to sex, as it is with other species of this genus. Acmaeodera consors was described from a female from “Tex.” (MCZC) measuring 7.5 mm long, and I examined two other Texas specimens: female, 7.5 mm, Travis Co., Austin, 18-VI-87, WFBM; male, 10.0 mm, Val Verde Co., 1 mi S Juno, 22-V-76, RLWE. Chamberlin (1926) listed a specimen from Arizona, Pinal Mts.; however, surely this refers to another species. Acmaeodera montezuma was described from what appears to be a female, measures 13 mm long, and is from “ Mexico ” (NMPC). Acmaeodera perforata was described from a male, 11 mm long, collected at New Braunfels, Texas, May, 1902 (AMNH). Acmaeodera delectabilis Waterhouse, 1889. Adults collected ex [likely on flowers] Cordia parviflora, Durango, 44 km SE Ceballos, 24-VIII-91, RLWE, SEMC. Acmaeodera depressa Barr, 1972. Reared from dead branches of Bursera microphylla from Arizona, Yuma Co., Telegraph Pass on I-8, summer 2002, WBWC (new larval host). Agrilus acutipennis Mannerheim, 1837. FLORIDA, Hernando Co., Croom Wildl. Mgmt. Area, Rital-Croom Road near I-75,15- IV-2006, on Quercus laurifolia, RLWE. Agrilus cephalicus LeConte, 1860. WISCONSIN, Outagamie Co., 1000 Is. Env. Ctr., Kaukana, 21/VI-5/ VII-2002, NSCH. Agrilus cladrastis Knull, 1945. MISSISSIPPI, Bolivar Co., 12.1 mi W Boyle on 446, Dahomey 2 MT, 12- 25-V-97, NSCH. Agrilus pulchellus Bland, 1865. UTAH, Utah Co., Provo, Rock Canyon, 5-VII-2002, BYUC. This record, based on one specimen of this widely ranging species, is from a locality within the range of the very closely related A. utahensis Westcott, the known range of which is from northern Utah to northern Arizona (Nelson and Westcott, 1991). Agrilus lasiosurus Obenberger, 1935. Honduras, S.C. Y., Lago Yojo, 21-VII-74, RLWE. This species has been recorded only from Costa Rica. Agrilus rubroniger Hespenheide, 1979. FLORIDA, Hernando Co., Croom Wildl. Mgmt. Area, Rital-Croom Road near I-75,15- IV-2006, on Quercus laurifolia, RLWE. Anthaxia carolinensis Obenberger, 1928. This species has been known only from “ Carolina ”. According to S. Bílÿ (P. Harpootlian via e-mail) the holotype is labeled: “ Sylvania, 30.6.[18]95/ America borealis, coll. Obenberger/ Carolina.” However, surely it was collected at Sylvania, California, which is the locality from which Chrysobothris sylvania Fall was described (Fall, 1910). Further evidence for its occurrence in California: I have examined a photograph of the aforementioned type and consider it to be the same as or close to A. pseudotsugae Chamberlin, which is considered by most authors as a subspecies of A. caseyi Obenberger (formerly very well known as A. deleta LeConte). However, this confusing related group of western taxa is in great need of study and any taxonomic changes are best left to that time. Brachys aerosus Melsheimer, 1846. It seems worthwhile to note only the second record of this species from BRITISH COLUMBIA: Vinsulla, 12-VI-67, on Populus tremuloides, 67-0-5410-07, PFCA. The first record is from Oliver (Barr, 1971), which is about 195 km south-southeast, and was collected on black birch. See Westcott (2005) for a discussion of this species in the Pacific Northwest. Chrysobothris nelsoni Westcott & Alten, 2006. NEVADA, Clark Co., Mt. Potosi BSA Camp, 23-VI-97, BYUC. Chrysobothris nixa Horn, 1886. UTAH, Tooele Co., Grantsville City, 3-VIII-2007, in Japanese beetle trap, UDAF. Chrysobothris schaefferi Obenberger, 1934. From Baja California N., one specimen each: cut from pupal cell in Dudleya albiflora, San Andres Can., ca. 19 km S Punta Prieta, 26-VI-80 (new larval host); beaten from Prunus fremontii, 24 mi E, 1.5 mi N El Rosario, 1300’, 8-VI-74; collected on Fouquieria splendens, 2 mi W Bahía Santa María, 22 mi S San Felipe, 2-VII-75, all RLWE. Phaenops lecontei (Obenberger), 1944. BRITISH COLUMBIA, 25 km SW Campbell River, 49°50’56”, 125°24’54”, 20-30-VIII-96, PFCA. The specimens were taken from a Lindgren funnel trap baited with ethanol raised 25 meters in a heavily thinned stand of Abies amabilis-Tsuga heterophylla dominant forest (Lee Humble, pers. comm.). This is the first record for Canada. Taphrocerus chevrolati Obenberger, 1924. UTAH, Uintah Co., 6 mi SE Randlett, SW Sec.35, T3S, R2E, SW of Pelican Lake near Duchesne River, 4800’, 4-VI-2007, sweeping marshy area with mostly Juncus sp., BYUC, EMUS, RLWE. Xenomelanophila miranda (LeConte, 1854). CALIFORNIA, Alpine Co., Markleeville, Dump Canyon, 20- VIII-50, on Juniperus occidentalis, FSCA, WFBM, and Markleeville, 1-VIII-61, CSCA; Lassen Co., Lassen N.F., “Cinder Fire”, T34N, R9E, Sec. 7, 19-VIII-1999, on burnt juniper in juniper-ponderosa pine forest, NSCH; Siskiyou Co., 15 mi NE Yreka, “Vista Fire” (juniper), 26-VIII-2000; Secs. 26 & 27, T40N, R2E, ca. 5 mi E Bartle, “Bear Fire”, 21-VIII-2007, on recently burnt Calocedrus decurrens, NSCH, RLWE. IDAHO, Cassia Co., 10 km (air) SSW Malta, 5050’, 14-VIII-86, base of juniper burnt 6 days previously, CASC, CLBC, PJJC, RLWE, WFBM. NEVADA, Storey Co., 4 mi N Virginia City, 23-VI-86, on side of house near recent burn, NVDA. WA S H I N GTO N, Yakima Co., Yakima, landscape waste recycle station, in Lindgren funnel trap baited for Sirex noctilio detection, 17-VII-2007, RLWE, WSUC. The latter record, a collection of seven specimens, represents the northernmost known locality for this species. I am unaware that native juniper (it would be J. occidentalis) occurs in significant numbers near Yakima, so these beetles may represent an introduced population—they could utilize ornamental junipers, or perhaps another cupressaceous host (see below)—or could have flown from afar. Alternatively, native junipers may once have occurred closer to Yakima, such as along the Columbia River prior to the advent of dams (Don Knoke, in litt.), and from that source become established in the city and its environs. The association of X. miranda with fire is well known, so it is of interest to note that the Yakima specimens were trapped about 100 feet from some pines that had burned a week earlier, and about two miles distant from some (apparently) ornamental junipers that burned in a small brush fire (E. Lisowski, in litt.). I know this species almost entirely from its association with burning or burnt junipers, and it can be attracted in very large numbers to forest fires where those trees occur (N. Schiff, pers. comm.; personal observation). Many have been taken at a wood recycling plant in Redmond, Deschutes Co., Oregon, in Lindgren funnel traps baited with alpha-pinene and ethanol, also in those traps at the nearby Bend landfill (Oregon Department of Agriculture Exotic Woodborer Survey). At the former site, juniper wood was being ground for mulch. Thus, quite clearly, wood volatiles attract these beetles. From my observations and those of colleagues, it has appeared that junipers are the only adult hosts (the beetle has never been reared). However, 12 specimens were collected by N. Schiff near Bartle, California, on burnt incense cedar at a site where no juniper was observed. It remains to be ascertained if that tree can serve as a host or if the beetles were attracted from surrounding areas where juniper occurs. That all were taken on the cupressaceous tree appears to favor the former hypothesis. In that regard it is worth noting Burke (1919) who, in regards to X. miranda, stated: “Considerable collecting has been done in forested areas of these regions by members of the Branch of Forest Insect Investigations but no specimens have been taken. The species is thus extremely rare or it does not infest the common forest trees.” He specifically mentioned other Buprestidae that are commonly attracted to forest fires, but apparently the work on “our most important coniferous forest trees” did not include junipers. In other papers he treated species that work in juniper, but apparently he was never lucky enough to find those trees burning and encounter the “wonderful fire beetle.” Near Malta, Idaho, P.J. Johnson and I collected and observed numerous individuals of X. miranda from 3:30–5: 20 p. m. (MDT) on what appeared to be, because of their smaller stature, Juniperus osteosperma rather than J. occidentalis. Almost all were seen at the base of trunks, and females were observed to oviposit only there, often to insert their ovipositor below ground (ash) level. In southeastern Oregon I have observed them higher on the trunk, but do not recall oviposition. Specifically, I collected them from a J. occidentalis tree near Klamath Falls that was still smoldering on 4-VIII-68. The trunk of this tree was cut and caged during VIII-70 and kept through the following year. Although smaller Buprestidae and woodboring wasps (Westcott, 1971) emerged, no X. miranda were reared. Surely that species oviposited in this tree. Given so, it could be they have a longer life cycle or that the larva—at least the mature larva—feeds beneath where the tree was cut. The Idaho observations suggest the latter. I have seen two specimens from western Oregon that represent anomalous records: Lane Co., Florence, on beach, 7-

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,020
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,067

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0200,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,189 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionTravaux en français237 207