MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912618952 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6227678

Chewobrachys sanguiflua Walker 1858, n. comb.

2008· article· en· W6912618952 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueDiptera species taxonomy and behavior
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMale genitaliaHandwritingBayNomenclatureTaxonomy (biology)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Chewobrachys sanguiflua (Walker, 1858) n. comb. Figs. 2–23, 26–28. Eurybrachys sanguiflua Walker, 1858: 330. Platybrachys sanguiflua (Walker, 1858): Stål, 1862: 488. Platybrachys insignis Distant, 1892: 282 n. syn. Platybrachys insignis Distant, 1892: Kirkaldy, 1906: 444. Platybrachys sanguiflua (Walker, 1858): Kirkaldy, 1906: 444. Platybrachys sanguiflua (Walker, 1858): Hacker, 1924: 39. Platybrachys insignis Distant, 1892: Metcalf, 1956: 55. Platybrachys sanguiflua (Walker, 1858): Metcalf, 1956: 57. Etymology. sanguiflua (Latin): from sanguis, blood and flua, derivated from fluere, to flow; means bleeding. The name is assumed to refer to the bright red colour of the body, legs and base of the hind wings. - insignis (Latin), remarkable, conspicuous. The name is assumed to refer to the whitish apical spots of the hind wings. Types examined - Lectotype ♂ of Eurybrachys sanguiflua Walker, 1858, present designation: [Moreton Bay (on the reverse) 57, 130] [Type] [Eurybrachys sanguiflua.] dissected, genitalia in glycerine (BMNH). Coordinates of Moreton Bay: 27°15'S 153°15'E. Note: the last label was cut from Walker's (1858) book. - Paralectotype Ψ of Eurybrachys sanguiflua Walker, 1858: [Moreton Bay (on the reverse) 57, 130] (BMNH). - Lectotype ♂ of Platybrachys insignis Distant, 1892, present designation: [Peak Downs] [Type] [insignis Dist.] [Distant Coll. 1911-383] both fore legs missing, dissected, genitalia in glycerine (BMNH). Coordinates of Peak Downs: 22°56'S 148°05'E. Note: four females from the same origin in the Distant's collection (BMNH) have been examined. One of them bears a label [sanguiflua Walk.] from Distant's handwriting and 2 of them have been identified as C. limbourgi. Distant (1892) does not mention the number of specimens he examined and only the hereabove listed male matches the size (expanded tegmina, 22 mm) mentioned in the description, females being much larger. For those reasons, none of those four females is here recognized as paralectotypes. Other material examined (15 ♂, 33 Ψ, 1 ex.). Queensland: 1 ♂, 3 Ψ: no data, H. Hacker [USNM]; 1 Ψ: Brisbane (27°30'S 153°01'E), A.M. Lea [SAM]; 3 Ψ: idem, Illidge [AMS]; 2 ♂, 3 Ψ: idem, H. Hacker [USNM]; 1 Ψ: idem, 21.iii.1953, A.G. Barrie [UQIC]; 1 Ψ: idem, 03.iii.1951, G. Saunders [UQIC]; 1 ♂: idem, 08.ii.1922, H. Hacker [USNM]; 1 Ψ: idem, 08.iii.1926, H. Hacker [QM]; 2 Ψ: idem, 26.xii.1924, H. Hacker [QM]; 2 ♂, 5 Ψ: idem, 27.iv.1924, H. Hacker [QM; 1♂, 1 Ψ: QDPI]; 1 ♂: idem, 27.iv.1924, H. Hacker [QM]; 1 ♂: idem, 15.iii.1956, H.J. Lavery [RBINS]; 1 Ψ: idem, 15.iii.1956, J. Martin [RBINS]; 1 Ψ: idem, 20.xii.1959, J. Martin [UQIC]; 1 ♂: idem, 20.iv.1940, V.B.D. Skerman [UQIC]; 2 Ψ: Burleigh (= Burleigh Heads) (28°06'S 153°27'E), xi.1923 [SAM]; 1 ♂, 1 Ψ: Burleigh Heads, C.P. Ledward [ANIC]; 1 ♂: Grovely (27°28'S 152°58'E), 28.ii.1966, J.H. Bassett, at light [QDPI]; 2 ♂, 3 Ψ: Mt Cootha, Brisbane (27°29'S 152°58'E), 06.iv.1924, H. Hacker [QM; 2 Ψ: USNM]; 2 Ψ, 1 ex (only right wings left): idem, 11.v.1924, H. Hacker [USNM]; 1 ♂: idem, 16.iii.1924, H. Hacker [QDPI]; 1 ♂: idem, 23.iv.1924, H. Hacker [QM]; 1 ♂: Nudgee, Brisbane (27°22'S 153°05'E), 22.xi.1924, H. Hacker [QM]; 2 Ψ: Peak Downs [BMNH]; 1 Ψ: Stradbroke Island (27°35'S 153°28'E), 5.xii.1913, H. Hacker [BMNH]. The following females are attributed to C. sanguiflua on the basis of morphometrical and colour characters indicated in diagnosis: New South Wales: 1 Ψ: 6 miles NE Bullawa Creek, E. Narrabri (30°19'S 149°50'E), 6.iv.1951,Key & Chinnick [ANIC]; 1 Ψ: Glossodia (33°31'S 150°49'E), near Sydney, 12.i.1981, D. James [ASCU]; Queensland: 1 Ψ: Cooloola N.P., near freshwater lake (26°12'S 153°03'E), 21.iv.1981, G.R. Brown [ASCU]; 1 Ψ: Frenchville (DW16) (23°21'S 150°33'E), 100 m, 21.iii.1991, K. Williams & R. Raven [QM]; 1 Ψ: Isla Gorge N.P., NE cnr (25°10'S 150°01'E), 240m, 22.ix-15.xii.1997, Vine scrub, interception trap, Monteith & Cook [QM]; 1 Ψ: Moranbah (22°02'S 148°03'E), 5 km S, 240 m, 20.xii.1997 - 26.iv.1998, pitfall trap, Bendee Scrub, G.B. Monteith [QM]; 1 Ψ: Mt Bassett (26°25'S 148°55'E), 3,4 km NNE, 500 m, 5.iii.2002, Monteith, Cook & Wright [QM]; 1 Ψ: Mt Tamborine (= Hendersons Knob) (27°55'S 153°10'E), 10.x.1979, J.F. Donaldson [QDPI]; 2 Ψ: Rannes (24°07'S 150°07'E), 21.xi.1947, K.R. Norris [ANIC]; 1 Ψ: Redland Bay (27°37'S 153°19'E), 3.ii.1941, A.F. Smith [UQIC]; 1 Ψ: Sapphire (23°28'S 147°43'E), 7.x.1991, in house, L. Kempson [QDPI]; 1 Ψ: Sunnybank (27°35'S 153°03'E), 10.ix.1947, J.W. Littler [UQIC]; 1 Ψ: Virginia (27°23'S 153°04'E), 20.iii.1927, J.A. Beck [UQIC]; 5 Ψ: Cunnamulla (28°04'S 145°41'E), x.1941, N. Geary [AMS]; 1 Ψ: idem, 5.xi.1940 [RBINS]; 1 Ψ: idem, 2.xi.1940 [AMS]; 1 Ψ: Bringalily Creek, Inglewood (28°11'S 151°12'E), 20.iv.1910, H. Tryon [QDPI]; 1 Ψ: near Dogwood R. crossing, 28km W of Condamine (26°56'S 150°08'E), 19.xii.1987, M.S. & B.J. Moulds [ASCU]; 1 Ψ: Rockhampton (23°23'S 150°30'E), i.1923 [SAM]. Diagnosis. The males can be identified by examination of the genitalia. The females have tegmina broader (LTg/BTg less than 2.40), with costal margin slightly rounded and white spots of hind wings more developed than in C. limbourgi. Identification of females is always more sure when males have been captured together with them. Description. LT: ♂ (n = 4): 13.1 mm (12.0–14.2); Ψ (n = 30): 13.6 mm (12.0–15.3). Head: frons variegated, green (living females) (fig. 18), grey-olivaceous to brown-olivaceous (males and collection females); lateral sides of head paler; vertex dark brown with disc yellow-brown to olivaceous; clypeus and labium reddish brown; antennae brown; ratio BV/LV = 4.1–5.0; BF/LF = 2.0. Thorax: tegulae, pro- and mesonotum dark brown; metanotum and ventral face bright red; ratio LP+LM/ BT = 0.86; LM/LP = 2.6. Tegmina: brown with irregular, whitish to pale greyish markings, sometimes suffused with pale greenish; markings forming postero-costal patch and transverse band on basal third of corium, sometimes extending to clavus; veins suffused with red basally, sometimes suffused with greenish on disc (figs. 26–28); ratio LTg/ BTg = ♂: 2.5, Ψ: 2.31 (2.22–2.38). Hind wings: brown with base bright red; whitish spot apically at each angle; spots smaller in females, often fused in a sinuate band in males (figs 26–27). Legs: bright red with tibiae and tarsi darker, brownish; spines of hind legs brown to blackish. Abdomen: bright red with genitalia testaceous. Genitalia ♂: lateral process of gonostyli pointed and placed basally in lateral view (fig. 6), placed ventrally in ventral view; gonostyli in ventral view with internal margins well separated on most of length and external margin strongly emarginate near apex (fig. 7); aedeagus with dorsal margin sinuate and ventral margin strongly concave apically in lateral view, showing small teeth apically and ventrally (figs. 9, 10). Biology. The species has been observed by Mr. Peter Chew (pers. com., 2008) on March 30th, 2008 on the trunk of Acacia disparrima M.W. Mc Donald & Maslin (Fabaceae) at Karawatha Forest near Brisbane. The specimens were hiding in cracks of the stringy bark of those trees (Fig. 22), where their colour gives them perfect camouflage (Figs. 16, 21). Females were at about 1 metre high, males at about 2 metres, all facing downwards (figs 16, 20, 21). When disturbed (Fig. 17), they quickly walked up towards the tree top (Fig. 18), and jumped only when touched. One nymph (Fig. 19) was observed on the same tree as the adults and is attributed to this species. As the distribution range of Acacia disparrima is limited to coastal Queensland, it is clear that C. sanguiflua feeds on more than one species of Acacia. Acacia disparrima is a member of the Acacia aulacocarpa group and further investigation would be interesting to know if C. sanguiflua lives only on species of that group. One specimen has also been caught at light trap. The species seems widely distributed in SE Queensland and quite common around Brisbane.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,026
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,088

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0260,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,061
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,154 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorTravaux en français237 207