MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912640517 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4337951

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) julipile Gardner & Gibbs 2020, sp. nov.

2020· article· en· W6912640517 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueFern and Epiphyte Biology
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIdeal (ethics)TaxonLower lip

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) julipile sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: A8597CBD-1211-418D-99EE-1741EDB814E9 Figs 46– 48, 90E, 94C, 117B Diagnosis Females of Lasioglossum julipile sp. nov. can be recognized by the characters for the Lasioglossum clematisellum species complex (below), in addition to most of the body with very extensive, dense tomentum, and scutum with densely plumose hair. They are most similar to L. pallidellum, L. clavicorne sp. nov., and L. clastipedion sp. nov. Females of L. pallidellum have the metapostnotum rounded with rugae not reaching the posterior margin. Females of L. clavicorne sp. nov. have the scutum with numerous thin and weakly plumose hairs and are larger (5 mm). Females of L. clastipedion sp. nov. have the head and mesosoma slightly duller and more densely punctate (i ≤ 2 pd). Males of L. julipile sp. nov. can be recognized by the characters for the Lasioglossum clematisellum species complex (below), in addition to the frons with distinctly separated punctures (i ≤ 1 pd), propodeum lateral face rugulose, T2–4 with basolateral tomentum, and mesosoma with all hair densely plumose, appearing thickened. They are most similar to L. clematisellum, L. perditum sp. nov., and L. clastipedion sp. nov. Males of L. clematisellum and L. clastipedion sp. nov. have the frons slightly duller and more densely punctate (i <1 pd). Males of L. clematisellum also have the scutum with most hairs weakly plumose and T2–4 without basolateral tomentum. Males of L. perditum sp. nov. have the frons more sparsely punctate (i=1–3 pd) and propodeum lateral face smooth and tessellate. Etymology The specific epithet julipile is formed from the Latin noun ‘ iulus ’ (‘catkin’) and the adjective ‘ pile ’ (‘haired’). It refers to the densely plumose hair of this species, which resembles willow catkins. An appropriate translation would be the catkin-haired sweat bee. Material examined Holotype UNITED STATES – Arizona • ♀; Cochise Co., Junction of Moonlight and Blue Sky Roads; 32.2376° N, 109.731° W; 16 Sep. 2012; T.L. Griswold leg.; ex Wislizenia refracta; BBSL. [Verbatim label: USA:AZ Cochise Co. Junction of Moonlight & Blue Sky Roads S109.7310 E32.2376 16 Sep 2012 T.L. Griswold Wislizenia refracta / BBSL1028260 // BOLD / gard0113-AZ / DLIII157-19 // HOLOTYPE / Lasioglossum (Dialictus) julipile Gardner and Gibbs] Paratypes MEXICO – Chihuahua • 1♀; 12 mi. S of Samalayuca; [31.11° N, 106.48°W]; 10 Jul.1964; J. Powell leg.; ex Yucca; EMEC • 3 ♀♀; Villa Ahumada; [30.6° N, 106.5° W]; 1128 m a.s.l.; 28 Jul. 1953; SEMC. UNITED STATES – Arizona • 7 ♀♀; Cochise Co., 1 mi. S of Willcox; [32.23° N, 109.83° W]; 7 Aug. 1978; R.W. Brooks leg.; ex Wislizenia refracta; SEMC • 1 ♀; Cochise Co., 6 mi. S of Willcox; [32.16° N, 109.83° W]; 23 Aug. 1986; R.J. McGinley and B.M. Norden leg.; USNM • 3 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; BBSL • 3 ♀♀; Cochise Co., Willcox; [32.25° N, 109.83° W]; 19 Jun. 1969; R.M. Bohart leg.; UCDC • 6 ♀♀; Cochise Co., 3.45 mi. SEbE of Willcox; 32.2262° N, 109.7822° W; 1273 m a.s.l.; 1 Sep. 2009; T.L. Griswold leg.; BBSL • 1 ♀; Snowflake; [34.51° N, 110.08° W]; 25 Jul. 1956; Butler and Gerhardt leg.; UAIC • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 25 Jul. 1956; Butler and Gerhardt leg.; ex Medicago sativa; UAIC. – New Mexico • 2 ♀♀; Hidalgo Co., 2 mi. N of Rodeo; [31.86° N, 109.03° W]; 1256 m a.s.l.; 31 Jul. 1988; S. Lajeunesse leg.; MTEC • 28 ♀♀, 2 ♂♂; Hidalgo Co., 9 mi. N of Cotton City; [32.21° N, 108.88° W]; 11 Aug. 1978; R.W. Brooks leg.; ex Wislizenia refracta; SEMC • 1 ♀; Hidalgo Co., Antelope Corral, 6 mi. N of Rodeo; 31.9167–31.9333° N, 109– 109.0166° W; 1231 m a.s.l.; 25 Jun. 1984; H.A. Hespenheide leg.; ex Artemisia / Atriplex; LACM • 1 ♀; Hidalgo Co., Rodeo; [31.84° N, 109.03° W]; 18 Jun. 1969; R.M. Bohart leg.; UCDC • 4 ♀♀; Hidalgo Co., Rodeo vicinity; [31.84° N, 109.03° W]; 11 Jun. 1987; B.N. Danforth leg.; ex Cirsium; SEMC • 1 ♂; Socorro Co., Bosque del Apache; [33.8° N, 106.89° W]; 15 Jul. 1991; Ilan Yarom leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; Socorro Co., Rio Salado, 5 mi. W of Interstate 25; [33.6° N, 107.1° W]; 12 Jul. 1977; W. Rubink leg.; CSUC • 3 ♀♀; 7 mi. E of Grants; [35.14° N, 107.73° W]; 23 May 1945; Cockerell leg.; ex Fallugia paradoxa; UCRC • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 23 May 1945; W.P. Cockerell leg.; ex Fallugia paradoxa; UCRC • 2 ♀♀; Bernalillo; [35.3° N, 106.55° W]; 23 Jul. 1950; R.H. Beamer leg.; ex Solanum; SEMC • 1 ♀; Clovis; [34.41° N, 103.21° W]; 24 Jun. 1964; Gerald and L. Nielsen leg.; NMSU • 1 ♂; La Joya Wildlife Pres. 20 mi. N of Socorro; [34.34° N, 106.89° W]; 15–26 Jul. 1976; W. Rubink leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; White Sands; [32.8° N, 106.3° W]; 27 Jun. 1940; D.E. Hardy leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 30 Jun. 1932; R.H. Beamer leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; White Sands National Monument; [32.8° N, 106.3° W]; 16 Aug. 1967; R.M. Bohart leg.; UCDC • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 5 Aug. 1966; D.R. Miller leg.; UCDC • 1 ♀; same location as for preceding; 23 Aug. 1974; R.M. Bohart leg.; UCDC. Description Female COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue-green to olive green; clypeus apical colour black, reddish brown, or orange; labrum orange; mandible orange with black basal spot and red tip; flagellum reddish brown dorsally, orange ventrally; pronotal lobe reddish brown to orange; metasoma orange with dark spiracular spots on T3–4; legs reddish brown with femur-tibia joints, tibia apices, and tarsi mostly orange; tegula pale amber; wing membrane hyaline, veins with subcosta dark brown, otherwise pale amber to light brown. PUBESCENCE. Body hair colour white. Tomentum dense on paraocular area and gena, pronotal collar and lobe, space between pronotal lobe and tegula, metanotum anteriorly, metepisternum, T2 basolaterally, T3 throughout except medially, and T4 throughout; sparse on face below ocelli, preëpisternum, and mesepisternum. Scutum hair densely plumose. Wing hairs light, very short and sparse. Acarinarial fan complete or nearly so, sparse. T2 fringes sparse, T3 fringes sparse. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus punctures large and irregularly sparse (i <2 pd), becoming smaller and denser in basal half (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny, sometimes weakly imbricate basally; supraclypeal area punctures sparse (i =1–4 pd), sometimes becoming dense laterally (i ≤ 1 pd), diversopunctate, sculpture shiny; paraocular area punctures dense to moderately sparse (i ≤ 2 pd), sculpture shiny; frons punctures dense to moderately sparse (i ≤ 2 pd), sculpture shiny or weakly tessellate; vertex punctures moderately sparse (i= 1–3 pd), sculpture shiny; gena punctures moderately sparse (i=1–3 pd), sculpture shiny; postgena sculpture tessellate to weakly so; tegula punctures absent; scutum punctures moderately sparse (i= 1–2 pd), becoming sparser submedially (i =1–3 pd) and denser posteromedially (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny, becoming tessellate anteromedially; scutellum punctures moderately dense (i ≤ 2 pd), becoming sparser submedially (i=1–3 pd) and denser posteromedially (i <1 pd), diversopunctate, sculpture shiny; metanotum sculpture shiny and finely, densely punctate (i <1 pd), becoming rugulose laterally; metapostnotum rugae strong, highly anastomosing, reaching margin, sculpture shiny to weakly imbricate; preëpisternum sculpture shiny with crowded punctures (i = 0 pd) or areolate; hypoepimeron punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny; mesepisternum punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny; metepisternum sculpture ruguloso-lineate dorsally, tessellate and densely, obscurely punctate ventrally; propodeum lateral face sculpture tessellate; propodeum posterior face sculpture tessellate; T1 anterior face sculpture shiny; T1 dorsal surface punctures fine, sparse (i=1–4 pd), becoming finer or obscure on rim and absent in large apicolateral oval patches, sculpture shiny; T2 disc punctures moderately dense (i=1–2 pd), disc sculpture shiny, rim punctures fine, sparse (i=1–4 pd), rim sculpture shiny. STRUCTURE. Face length/width ratio 0.81 (± 0.02 SD). Clypeus projecting ~50% below suborbital tangent; clypeal area length/width ratio 0.42 (± 0.02 SD); apicolateral denticles low rounded knobs; supraclypeal area length/width ratio 0.68 (± 0.06 SD). Forewing with 3 submarginal cells; pronotal angle obtuse; tegula shape normal. Intertegular distance 0.89 (± 0.06 SD) mm. Scutum length/width ratio 0.75 (± 0.06 SD); scutum/scutellum length ratio 2.95 (± 0.22 SD); scutellum/metanotum length ratio 1.49 (± 0.12 SD); metanotum/metapostnotum length ratio 0.63 (± 0.04 SD). Propodeum lateral carinae not reaching dorsal margin; oblique carina very weak or absent. T2 depressed apical rim length about 50% of segment. (n=11) Male COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue to blue-green; clypeus apical colour reddish brown; labrum orange; mandible orange to yellow with brown basal spot and red tip; flagellum reddish brown dorsally, red to orange ventrally; pronotal lobe black, reddish brown, or orange; metasoma black to dark reddish brown with rims of terga and sterna broadly translucent reddish brown and downcurved lateral areas of terga becoming translucent orange; legs black to reddish brown with femur-tibia joints, base and apex of tibiae, and tarsi orange to yellow; tegula pale amber; wing membrane hyaline, veins with subcosta dark brown, otherwise brown to light brown. PUBESCENCE. Body hair colour white. Tomentum dense on face below ocelli, gena, pronotal angle and lobe, space between pronotal lobe and tegula, mesepisternum ventrally, and metepisternum; sparse on preëpisternum, mesepisternum dorsally, and T2–4 basolaterally. Scutum hair densely plumose. Sterna hair short (1–1.5 OD), densely plumose, dense and erect. Wing hairs light, short and sparse. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny; supraclypeal area punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny; paraocular area punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny; frons punctures dense (i ≤ 1 pd), sculpture shiny; vertex punctures moderately dense l

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,058

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,217
Écart entre enseignants0,174 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetFern and Epiphyte BiologyTravaux en français237 207