MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912644047 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6029490

Philydrodes (Minyphilydrodes) reticulatus Shavrin, sp.n.

2017· article· en· W6912644047 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueDate Palm Research Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeParatypeAedeagusAbdominal musclesAbdomen

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Philydrodes (Minyphilydrodes) reticulatus Shavrin, sp.n. (Figs. 3, 37, 40, 44–45, 52–53, 58) Type material examined: Holotype ♂ [The preparation of the aedeagus and apical abdominal segment in Canadian balsam was attached under the card with beetle]: SHAANXI PROVINCE: ‘ China: Shaanxi, Qin Ling Shan | 108.47 E, 33.51 N, Mountain W | pass at Autorote km 70, 47 km | S Xian, 2300–2500m, sifted | 26. – 30.08.1995, leg. M. Schülke’ <rectangular label, printed>, ‘Sammlung | M. Schülke | Berlin’ <green rectangular label, printed>, ‘ HOLOTYPE | Philydrodes (Minyphilydrodes) | reticulatus sp.n. | Shavrin A.V. des. 2016’ <red rectangular label, printed> (MNHUB). Paratypes: 1 ♂ [The preparation of aedeagus, abdominal tergite VIII and sternite VIII, and apical abdominal segement in Canadian balsam was attached under the card with beetle], 5 ♀ [The preparation of abdominal tergite VIII, sternite VIII and apical apical abdominal segment in Canadian balsam was attached under the card with beetle]: same data as the holotype (4 ♀: cSch; 1 ♂; 1 ♀: cS). All paratypes with my additional label: ‘ PARATYPE | Philydrodes (Minyphilydrodes) | reticulatus sp.n. | Shavrin A.V. des. 2016’ <red rectangular label, printed>. FIGURES 50–57. Male (50, 52, 54, 56) and female (51, 53, 55, 57) abdominal sternites VIII of Philydrodes: 50‾51— Ph. michaeli, 52‾53— Ph. reticulatus, 54‾55— Ph. tibetanus, 56‾57— Ph. wrasei. Scale bars 0.1 mm. One specimen without abdomen was not included in the type series (cSch). Description. Measurements (n=7): WH: 0.76–0.85; LH: 0.55–0.67; LA (holotype): 2.60; LE: 0.20¯0.25; LT: 0.20; LPM/WPM (holotype): III: 0.20 × 0.07, IV: 0.10 × 0.03; LP: 0.65–0.78; WPMax: 0.68–0.80; WPMin: 0.55– 0.65; LEl: 1.46–1.62; WE: 1.45–1.75; WA: 1.45¯1.75; LMTb: 1.20–1.22; LMTr: 0.37–0.44; LAed: 0.60–0.62; TL: 4.20–5.15 (holotype: 4.35). Head and abdomen brown, pronotum and elytra reddish brown; mouthparts, antennae and legs yellow brown; bases of antennomeres 1¯3 and ocelli yellow to yellow brown. Punctation of head regular, small and indistinct; punctation of pronotum denser and deeper than that on head, interspaces between punctures in median part of disc as diameter of 2–3 punctures, with small elongate impunctate area in medio-basal portion; punctation of elytra deeper and larger than that on pronotum, interspaces between punctures on median portion of each elytron as diameter of 1–2 punctures; abdomen with very dense, fine regular punctation. Microsculpture of pronotum finer than that on head with distinctly visible punctation on background of it; narrow band along basal margin with coarser and smaller ground sculpture. Habitus as in Fig. 3. Head 1.2¯1.3 times as broad as long. Eyes as long as temples or slightly longer. Maxillary palp segment 3 twice as long as apical (4th) segment. Antennomeres with lengths widths (holotype): 1: 0.27 0.10; 2: 0.20 0.07; 3: 0.25 0.07; 4–8: 0.23 0.07; 9–10: 0.23 0.08; 11: 0.27 0.08. Pronotum slightly narrower than head, slightly broader than long. Elytra slightly more than twice longer than pronotum, as long as broad or slightly broader than long. Male. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII rounded (Fig. 44). Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII with narrow deep emargination (Fig. 52). Aedeagus (Fig. 37) elongated, with small phallobase, median lobe narrowing after median part toward rounded apex; parameres thin, exceeding apex of aedeagus, with two apical and two postero-apical short setae; aedeagus with strongly sclerotized narrow dorsal lobe not reaching apex of aedeagus, with very thin long flagellum within it; endophallus with two elongated areas of thorns in apical third. Aedeagus laterally as in Fig. 40. Female. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII indistinctly rounded (Fig. 45). Apical margin of abdominal sternite VIII straight (Fig. 53). Comparative notes. Based on the shape of narrow aedeagus with very small phallobase, Ph. reticulatus sp.n. is similar to Ph. michaeli sp.n., from which it differs by slightly wider median lobe and parameres, by the narrower apex of aedeagus, by the arrangment of parameral setae (all parameral setae of Ph. michaeli sp.n. are apical); furthermore it differs from other Chinese species by the more indistict punctation of head, by the longer eyes, by the narrower pronotum, by the slightly shorter elytra and by the shape of apical emargination of male abdominal tergite and sternite VIII. Etymology. The specific epithet is a Latin adjective reticulatus (reticulate, meshy) and alludes to the presence of moderately strong microsculpture on the pronotum. Distribution. The species is known from the type locality (Fig. 58) in high altitudes of Qin Ling Shan range, Shaanxi, China. Bionomics. According to the personal communication of M. Schülke, the specimens were collected in a place (2300–2500 m a.s.l.) with streams and large rocks overgrown with grass, bushes and small trees (mostly pines); the specimens were collected running on the ground, only at the surface of places forming small swampy areas with small patches of Alnus forest by sifting and near the water turning stones.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,738
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,000
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetDate Palm Research StudiesTravaux en français237 207