Pholetesor rhygoplitoides Whitfield 2006, new species
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pholetesor rhygoplitoides, new species (figs. 22, 45, 65) Holotype female. Body length 2.2 mm, forewing length 2.4 mm. Head. Frons 1.3x broader at midheight than long down midline, fine irregularity of surface partly confusing punctation pattern; inner margins of eyes weakly converging towards clypeus. Antennae approximately same length as forewing, dark brown throughout; all but apical 5 flagellomeres with 2 ranks of placodes; flagellomere 2 3.5x longer than broad; flagellomere 14 7x longer than broad. Palpi light yelloworange throughout. Head in dorsal view 2x broader than long down midline. Mesosoma. Mesoscutum distinctly punctate, more closely so anteriorly than posteriorly; interstices with only faint metallic sheen; mesoscutal width just anterior to tegulae 0.9x that of head. Scutoscutellar scrobe broad, composed of 8–10 coarse punctures, nearly straight medially. Scutellar disc virtually impunctate, peripherally weakly punctate, apparently with very weak longitudinal microsculpturing; disc slightly longer than maximum breadth. Metanotum nearly appressed anteriorly to scutellum, not strongly excavated mesad sublateral setiferous lobes; anterolateral regions irregularly rugulose; with transverse depressions at midlength on either side, crossed by several irregular carinulae. Metapleuron centrally smooth around spiracle, otherwise coarsely punctate, hairy. Propodeum anteriorly punctulorugose, posteriorly depressed and very coarsely rugose; rugosity extending further to anterior medially; propodeum 1.8x broader than maximum length. Legs. Coxae of all legs dark brown to black, especially proximally; otherwise, legs strongly honeyorange with apices of hind tibiae, tarsi and femoral bases slightly infuscate. Spines on outer faces of hind tibiae 20–25 in number, sometimes difficult to distinguish from normal hairs. Apical spurs of hind tibiae subequal in length, yelloworange, slightly over a third as long as hind basitarsus. Wings. Tegulae moderately dark brown, translucent. Forewings narrow, tinted pale brownish with deep brown venation, especially along anterior edge (stigma, R1, 2r, 1Rs); 2r arched, slightly longer than 1Rs, meetings 1Rs at sharp 125degree junction; R1 1.2x as long as stigma, 3.5x as long as distance from its distal tip to end of 3Rs fold along wing edge; stigma 2.3x longer than broad. Hindwing with vannal lobe distinctly flattened, vannal fringe continuous but somewhat sparser over distal half. Cu+cua strongly reclivous. Metasoma. Tergite I approximately as long as posteriorly broad, 1.3x as broad posteriorly as anteriorly; lateral margins evenly diverging over most of length, than rounded over apical 0.4; posterior margin slightly concave medially; surface coarsely aciculorugose, with small, shallow anteromedial smoother depression. Tergite II strongly quadrate, 2.1x broader than long, aciculorugose, bounded posteriorly by irregularly crenulate furrow. Tergite III aciculorugose over most of surface. posteriorly (especially posterolaterally) with thin unsculptured edge which is lighter in color; entire tergum subequal in length with tergite II, sculptured portion 0.6 (laterally) to 0.8 (medially) as long as tergite II. Laterotergites light to medium yellowbrown, nearly hidden in dorsal view by broad tergites. Succeeding terga normal, unsculptured, overlapping, mostly telescoped under anterior 3. Hypopygium subequal in length with hind basitarsus, acuminate apically, submedially weakly creased, setting off narrow, more translucent medial fold. Ovipositor sheaths virtually same length as either hypopygium or hind basitarsi, proximally slender weakly decurved, distal 0.7 hairy, strongly broadened and flattened, dorsally more strongly rounded; tip bluntly rounded, asymmetrical. Ovipositor evenly decurved. Males. The single available male from Arizona is much lighter in leg, antennal and tegula color than more northern females. Wing venation similar to some of female paratypes but 2r much shorter than in holotype (shorter than 1Rs) and not arched. Antennae longer than in females, 1.3x as long as forewing, strongly tapering towards tip; all flagellomeres apparently with 2 ranks of placodes. Length/width of flagellomere 2 = 3.2, of flagellomere 14 = 2.4. Forewing length 2.5 mm, body length 2.2 mm. Variation. Body length 2.0– 2.4 mm; forewing length 2.1–2.7 mm. The most noticeable variation occurs in antennal coloration and the relative lengths of 2r and 1Rs in the forewing. In several specimens, the basal segments of the antennae are light yellow, becoming gradually darker distally. 2r and 1Rs always seem to meet at a sharp angle, but 2r varies from being arched and longer than 1Rs (as in the holotype) to being considerably shorter and straight (as in figure 31). I have associated the western specimens with the eastern despite the apparent disjunction; I see no morphological evidence to support their separation. Final instar larva. Unknown. Cocoons. Unknown. Material examined. Holotype female: IDAHO. Valley Co., Donally, 23VIII1952 (S.E.Knapp). Paratypes: ARIZONA. Portal, SW Research Sta., 1 male, 2VIII1955, 5400' (R. R. Dreisbach). IDAHO. Valley Co., Donally, 1 female, 23VIII1952 (S.E. Knapp). MINNESOTA. Lyon Co., Camden State Pk., 1 female, 23VII1974, malaise trap (no collector given). ONTARIO. Mer Bleue, 1 female, 19VII1963 (J.G. Chilcott). QUEBEC. Chimo, 1 female, 1718VIII1959 (W. R. Mason). Holotype in USNM collection; paratypes in USNM, CNC, University of Minnesota and Michigan State University Collections. Hosts. Unknown. Comments. The form of the ovipositor sheaths and the propodeal sculpturing best distinguish this species within the pinifollielae group. The geographic and habitat ranges appear to be quite broad, judging from the collection localities. The specific epithet refers to the superficial similarity to members of Rhygoplitis, which tend to have narrow wings, sharply angled 2r and 1Rs and (sometimes) broad, strongly sculptured anterior metasomal tergites, as in this species.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».