MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912762170 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7221934

Peromyscus sonoriensis

2019· article· he· W6912762170 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languehe
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPeromyscusDeer mouseNational monumentAmphibian

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Peromyscus sonoriensis (LeConte) Hesp [eromys] sonoriensis Le Conte, 1853:413. Hesperomys austerus Baird, 1855:336. Mus bairdii Hoy and Kennicott, 1857:92. Hesperomys sonoriensis var. nebrascensis Coues, 1877:79. Hesperomys leucopus arcticus Mearns, 1890:285 Hesperomys leucopus nebrascensis Mearns, 1890:285. Hesperomys leucopus deserticolus Mearns, 1890:287. Hesperomys leucopus rufinus Merriam, 1890:65. Peromyscus texanus nebrascensis J. A. Allen, 1896:251. Sitomys americanus artemisiae Rhoads, 1894:260. Sitomys insolatus Rhoads, 1894:256. Peromyscus michiganensis pallescens J. A. Allen, 1896:238. Peromyscus texanus saturatus Bangs, 1897:75. Peromyscus texanus subarcticus J. A. Allen, 1899:15. Peromyscus akeleyi Elliot, 1899:226. Peromyscus maniculatus arcticus Osgood, 1900:33. Peromyscus oreas rubidus Osgood, 1901a:193. Peromyscus perimekurus Elliot, 1903:156. Peromyscus oresterus Elliot, 1903:159. Peromyscus luteus Osgood, 1905:77. Peromyscus maniculatus artemisiae Osgood, 1909:58. Peromyscus maniculatus saturatus Osgood, 1909:61. Peromyscus maniculatus hollisteri Osgood, 1909:62. Peromyscus maniculatus austerus Osgood, 1909:63. Peromyscus maniculatus rubidus Osgood, 1909:65. Peromyscus maniculatus rufinus Osgood, 1909:72. Peromyscus maniculatus nebrascensis Osgood, 1909:75. Peromyscus maniculatus luteus Osgood, 1909:77. Peromyscus maniculatus bairdi Osgood, 1909:79. Peromyscus maniculatus pallescens Osgood, 1909:83. Peromyscus maniculatus sonoriensis Osgood, 1909:89. Peromyscus maniculatus borealis Mearns, 1911:102. Peromyscus maniculatus nebrascensis Mearns, 1911:102. Peromyscus maniculatus osgoodi Mearns, 1911:102. Peromyscus maniculatus angustus Hall, 1932:423. Peromyscus maniculatus ozarkiarum Black, 1935:144. Peromyscus maniculatus gunnisoni Goldman, 1937:224. Peromyscus maniculatus alpinus Cowan, 1937:215. Peromyscus maniculatus georgiensis Hall, 1938:455. Peromyscus maniculatus serratus Davis, 1939:290. Peromyscus maniculatus inclarus Goldman, 1939:355. Peromyscus maniculatus bairdii McCabe and Cowan, 1945:197. Peromyscus maniculatus saxamans McCabe and Cowan, 1945:198. Holotype. —United States National Museum (catalog number 146); adult, sex unknown, skin and skull. Type locality. — Mexico; Sonora; Santa Cruz; collected on 28 September 1851 by J. H. Clark. Subspecies. —Although we were not able to examine all of the recognized subspecies that potentially are referable to P. maniculatus, we tentatively assign the following 15 subspecies recognized in Hall (1981) and Hogan et al. (1993) to P. sonoriensis: alpinus, artemisiase, austerus, borealis, hollisteri, inclarus, luteus, nebrascensis, ozarkiarum, pallescens, rubidus, rufinus, saturatus, saxamans, serratus, and sonoriensis. Diagnosis. —Coloration varies greatly between subspecies (austerus darker in color whereas pallescens is much paler than other subspecies), however, most adults are ochraceous buff (Osgood 1909). Size small for species group, especially relative to length of the tail; measurements obtained from Osgood (1909) for several of the subspecies now assigned to P. sonoroensis, indicated a total length averaging 151 mm; (range 126–176 mm) and tail length averaging 65.5 mm (range 56–75 mm). Tail tends to be more thickly haired and more sharply bicolored (Osgood 1909) than other species in the group. In this study, Cyt b sequences indicated that P. sonoriensis differed from P. gambelii, P. melanotis, P. polionotus, P. sejugis, and P. maniculatus (sensu stricto), by 4.55%, 6.02%, 4.71%, 4.42%, and 4.68%, respectively. Genetic differentiation (= 1.27%) based on DNA sequences obtained from 186 individuals of P. sonoriensis. This species exhibited a moderate level of genetic divergence even though it possesses the broadest geographic distribution of the P. maniculatus species group. Distribution. —Occurs primarily west of the Mississippi River from the Yukon and Northwest Territory southward to northern California and the United States/Mexico border (along Arizona and New Mexico) then eastward across northern Texas to Arkansas. The distribution of P. sonoriensis does not include: 1) the coastal islands and mainlands fromAlaska southward to Oregon; in this area P. keeni may exclude P. sonoriensis or the two species may be sympatric; 2) southcentral California and Baja California and the southwest corner of Arizona where P. gambelii occurs; and 3) southern New Mexico, and southwestern of Texas where P. labecula occurs. Populations of mice that are assignable to P. sonoriensis appear to occur on Isle Royale, Michigan (Dragoo et al. 2006; this study) and in southern Michigan (Lansman et al. 1983); whereas samples from northcentral Michigan are assignable to P. maniculatus (Lansman et al. 1983). Additional samples are needed from much of the Great Lakes region to resolve this conundrum. Comparisons. —A member of the P. maniculatus species group. Similar in coloration but smaller in size compared to other members of the P. maniculatus species group. Specimens from the Pacific Northwest are darker in pelage color (more similar to P. keeni) than those occurring in the central and eastern portions of the continent exhibit. Differs from P. keeni in external measurements such as tail length (averaging <100 mm compared to an average length> 100 mm in P. keeni). Remarks. —Two seventy-two samples examined were assigned to P. sonoriensis. Of these samples, the closest examined herein (Grant County, New Mexico) was approximately 200 km northeast of the type locality in Santa Cruz, Sonora. Chromosomal data are highly variable for this group with a broad range of FNs (72–86) with some well-studied subspecies, such as P. m. bardii, reported as highly polymorphic (74–85). A trend in the data suggest that lower FNs (72–80) for this species occur in the Pacific Northwest, where populations exist in sympatry with P. keeni (Gunn and Greenbaum et al. 1986; Gunn 1988; Hogan et al. 1993). The FNs reported for P. sonoriensis span the ranges reported for P. gambelii, P. labecula, and P. maniculatus; but differ substantially from those observed for P. melanotis (FN = 62, Hsu and Arrighi 1968; Bowers et al. 1973), P. polionotus (FN = 69–71, Te and Dawson 1971), and P. sejugis (FN = 76, Smith et al. 2000). Several previous studies (Dragoo et al. 2006, Gering et al. 2009, Kalkvik et al. 2012, Natarajan et al. 2015, Sawyer et al. 2017, and Greenbaum et al. 2017 indicated that populations of P. maniculatus in the eastern regions of the United States were genetically divergent from central and western populations. Similarly, DNA sequence data (Cyt b gene), presented herein, suggest elevation to species status that would include 17 currently recognized subspecies of P. maniculatus. This population encompasses the largest geographic area of any clade recovered in this study. Divergence dates suggest P. sonoriensis last shared a common ancestor with the lineage giving rise to P. polionotus approximately 1.40 mya. As discussed earlier, P. sonoriensis appears to be sympatric with samples of P. gambelii in western Nevada (NAS Fallon Air Force Base) and at two separate localities in east-central California (one in Mono County and one in Tuolumne County). Further, P. sonoriensis appears to be sympatric with samples of P. labecula in southcentral New Mexico (6.2 mi NW of Timberon). Additional data are need from these areas to determine if these genetic species (see Bradley and Baker 2001; Baker and Bradley 2006) are behaving as biological species (Mayr 1942) as well as genetic species.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,058

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0170,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,217
Écart entre enseignants0,185 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetBat Biology and Ecology Studies→Travaux en français237 207→