Redcliffe Quarter Phases 1 and 2, Bristol: Post-Excavation Assessment and Updated Project Design, Volume 1: Text
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Fieldwork commenced with the removal of overburden from the excavation area by mechanical excavator with a toothless grading bucket, under archaeological supervision. Machinery was also used on occasion to remove bulk deposits under archaeological supervision.The archaeological features thus exposed were hand-excavated to the bottom of archaeological stratigraphy which reached a depth of up to 2m. Normally, all horizontal deposits were excavated so as to exposed more deeply buried deposits, while discrete cut features were at least 50% excavated and linear features sample excavated on a more opportunistic basis, all hand excavation being contingent upon safe working conditions. All features and deposits were planned and recorded in accordance with CA Technical Manual 1: Fieldwork Recording Manual (CA 2013). Deposits were assessed for their environmental potential in accordance with CA Technical Manual 2: The taking and processing of environmental and other samples from archaeological sites (CA 2012), and, in view of the exceptional preservation of some of the deeper features, where waterlogged organic material was present, a high priority was given to environmental samples. All artefacts recovered from the excavation were retained in accordance with CA Technical Manual 3: Treatment of finds immediately after excavation (CA 1995). Two programmes of archaeological investigation were undertaken by Cotswold Archaeology and Oxford Cotswold Archaeology between January 2016 and December 2018 at the request of Gleeds (for RQ1) and FT Squared (for RQ2) on behalf of Redcliff MCC LLP at the Redcliffe Quarter development site. The phases of work, which lay on adjacent sites and originally started as a single development project, were undertaken in two stages for practical reasons. The results are combined in this assessment report and incorporate results from watching brief interventions and other site groundworks as appropriate. The site was divided into seven main areas of excavation, with other areas of watching brief. Evidence of occupation from the 12th century to the modern era was discovered, and this has been divided into five Provisional Periods. Period 1 comprises a small number of features and finds at the interface with the natural alluvium pre-dating the earliest recognisable occupation. Associated finds indicate that this was no earlier than the 12th century. Beneath the archaeological horizon the natural alluvial Wentlooge desposits were found to have little archaeological potential. Period 2 spans the 12th to mid 14th centuries and contains the largest number of features and finds from any period. Features consist mostly of ditches and pits, many containing organic materials preserved by waterlogging - wooden wattle linings, timbers and stakes, leather, plants and insects - as well as abundant pottery, animal bone and fish bone. Some of the organic remains in particular are exceptionally significant. Some ditches appear to mark the locations of tenement boundaries lasting into the 19th century, including the Law Ditch to the rear of properties fronting Redcliff Street and St Thomas Street. Later there are traces of stone-founded buildings, with ceramic roof tile and floor tiles present. Period 3, from the mid 14th to 15th centuries, saw a continuation of this medieval occupation. Stone buildings were constructed and there was further evidence of circular stone structures that may have been dye-vat bases. Other stages of manufacture such as wool preparation, horn-working and possibly tanning or hide preparation are also indicated. Period 4, the 16th to 17th centuries saw less activity in terms of the quantity of pottery and other finds, although construction continued. There was more evidence of 'garden soils', suggesting changes to other uses.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».