Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Subgenus EUSIMULIUM Roubaud Simulium angustipes Edwards Dunbar (1958a, 1959, characterization, cytodendrogram, idiogram, inversions mapped, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as S. aureum ‘E’): Russia Chubareva & Shcherbakov (1963a, notes on general polytene features; as E. securiforme): [Russia] Chubareva & Shcherbakov (1963b, notes on general polytene features, photos of metaphase and lowmagnification polytene complements and ectopic pairing; as E. securiforme): Russia Dunbar (1965, cytodendrogram; as E. aureum ‘E’): [Russia] Shcherbakov (1965a, photos of metaphase complement; as E. securiforme): Russia Dunbar (1966b, chromosomal key; as E. aureum group [in part]): Britain Simonenko (1966, description; inversions mapped; photos of polytene complement [low magnification], ectopic pairing of chromosome ends, and selected polymorphisms; as E. securiforme): Russia Shcherbakov (1969a, photos of metaphase and interphase chromosomes; as E. securiforme): Russia Chubareva (1979a, notes on general polytene features; as E. securiforme): Russia Chubareva & Petrova (1979, notes on general polytene features, polytene chromosome lengths; as E. securiforme): Armenia Chubareva (1980a, description, idiogram, partial comparison with S. reginae; as E. securiforme): Russia Chubareva (1984, photos of metaphase and polytene complements; as E. securiforme): Russia Leonhardt (1985, 1987, characterization, cytodendrogram, inversions mapped, male chiasmate meiosis, photos of all arms, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as E. aureum ‘E’): Britain (England, Wales), Italy, Norway, Russia Chubareva & Petrova (2003, notes on general polytene features, polytene chromosome lengths; as E. securiforme): Russia Chubareva & Petrova (2008a, description, photos of metaphase and polytene complements, polytene chromosome lengths; as E. securiforme): Russia Day, Mustapha & Post (2010, diagnostic inversions mapped, low-magnification photos of chromosomes I and II): Britain (England) Simulium aureum Fries Dunbar (1958a, 1959, characterization, cytodendrogram, idiogram, inversions mapped, photos of IS and IL, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as S. aureum ‘F’): Britain (England, Scotland), Russia Dunbar (1965, cytodendrogram; as E. aureum ‘F’): [Europe, Russia] Dunbar (1966b, chromosomal key; as E. aureum group [in part]): Britain Leonhardt (1985, characterization, cytodendrogram, inversions mapped, male chiasmate meiosis, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as E. aureum ‘F’): Britain (England, Scotland, Wales), Iceland, Norway, Russia Leonhardt (1987, characterization, cytodendrogram, inversions mapped, male chiasmate meiosis, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as E. aureum ‘F’): Britain (England, Scotland, Wales), Denmark, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Russia Leonhardt & Feraday (1989, idiogram, male chiasmate meiosis, sex chromosomes; as E. aureum ‘F’): Britain (England, Scotland, Wales), Denmark, Iceland, Ireland, Norway, Russia Chubareva & Petrova (2000b, note on general polytene features): Russia Chubareva & Petrova (2004, notes on general polytene features, polytene chromosome lengths): Russia Chubareva & Petrova (2008a, description, polytene chromosome lengths): Russia Simulium azorense (Carlsson) Leonhardt (1985, 1987, characterization, cytodendrogram, inversions mapped, male chiasmate meiosis, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as E. aureum ‘J’ [in part]): Azores Leonhardt in Crosskey (1986, inversions mapped, photo of polytene complement): Azores Simulium brachyantherum Rubtsov Chubareva (1977c, idiogram, notes on general polytene features and evolution of dichromosomic [n = 2] condition): [Uzbekistan] Chubareva (1979a, notes on general polytene features; as E. brachianterum [sic]): Uzbekistan Chubareva & Petrova (1979, notes on general polytene features; as E. brachyanterum [sic]): Armenia Chubareva (1980a, description, partial comparison with S. reginae, photos of metaphase and polytene complements): Uzbekistan Chubareva & Petrova (2003, notes on general polytene features): Uzbekistan Chubareva & Petrova (2008a, description, photos of metaphase and polytene complements): Uzbekistan Simulium bracteatum Coquillett Dunbar (1958a, 1958b, characterization; chosen as standard banding sequence for S. aureum group; idiogram; inversions mapped; origin of dichromosomic [n = 2] condition; photos of metaphase complement, all arms, and selected polymorphisms; resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as S. aureum ‘sibling A’): Canada Dunbar (1959, characterization, cytodendrogram, idiogram, inversions mapped, photos of partial IIS, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as S. aureum ‘A’): Canada Dunbar (1962, chromosomal key, description, idiogram, photo of polytene complement; as E. aureum ‘A’): Canada Dunbar (1965, cytodendrogram; as E. aureum ‘A’): [Canada] Rothfels & Mason (1975, male achiasmate meiosis; as E. aureum ‘A’): Canada Leonhardt (1985, 1987, characterization, cytodendrogram, inversions mapped, male achiasmate meioisis, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as E. aureum ‘A’): Canada, USA Adler & Kim (1986, chromosomal characters in larval key; as S. aureum ‘A’): USA Leonhardt & Feraday (1989, notes on male achiasmate meiosis and sex chromosomes; as E. aureum ‘A’): Canada, USA Adler, Currie & Wood (2004, chromosomal characters in larval key): North America Simulium donovani Vargas Dunbar (1958a, 1959, characterization; cytodendrogram; idiogram; inversions mapped; photos of CI, IS, and IL with polymorphisms; resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as S. aureum ‘G’): USA Dunbar (1965, cytodendrogram; as E. aureum ‘G’): [USA] Leonhardt (1985, 1987, characterization, cytodendrogram, drawing of sex chromosomes, inversions mapped, male chiasmate meiosis, photos of partial IS and sex chromosomes, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as E. aureum ‘G’): Guatemala, USA Leonhardt & Feraday (1989, idiogram, male chiasmate meiosis, sex chromosomes; as E. aureum ‘G’): Guatemala, USA Adler, Currie & Wood (2004, chromosomal characters in larval key): North America Simulium exulatum Adler, Currie & Wood 2004 Dunbar (1958a, 1959, characterization; cytodendrogram; idiogram; inversions mapped; photos of CI, IS, IL, and secondary nucleolus; resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as S. aureum ‘C’): Canada Dunbar (1962, chromosomal key, description, idiogram, photo of polytene complement, as E. aureum ‘C’): Canada, USA Dunbar (1965, cytodendrogram; as E. aureum ‘C’): [Canada] Rothfels & Mason (1975, centromere shift; drawing of centromere shift; idiogram; linked inversions; male achiasmate meiosis; photos of IL end, IIS arm and centromere region, and selected polymorphisms; as E. aureum ‘C’): Canada Leonhardt (1985, 1987, characterization, cytodendrogram, inversions mapped, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as E. aureum ‘C’): Canada, USA Adler, Currie & Wood (2004, chromosomal characters in larval key): North America Simulium guimari Becker Leonhardt (1985, 1987, characterization, cytodendrogram, inversions mapped, male chiasmate meiosis, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as E. aureum ‘M’): Canary Islands Adler in Crosskey & Báez (2004, diagnostic inversions mapped, photo of polytene complement): Canary Islands Simulium kazahstanicum (Rubtsov) Ismagulov (1993, notes on general polytene features [only abstract seen]): Kazakhstan Chubareva & Petrova (2003, notes on general polytene features): Kazakhstan Chubareva & Petrova (2008a, description, photos of metaphase and polytene complements): Kazakhstan Chubareva & Petrova (2009b, description, low-magnification photos of mitotic and polytene complements): Kazakhstan Simulium krymense (Rubtsov) Chubareva & Petrova (2008a, description, photos of metaphase and polytene complements): Ukraine (Crimea) Simulium mellah Giudicelli & Bouzidi Adler, Cherairia, Arigue, Samraoui & Belqat (2015, characterization, chromosomal phylogeny, inversions mapped, photo of partial IS, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard): Algeria, Morocco Simulium paucicuspis Rubtsov Chubareva & Petrova (1979, 2003, notes on general polytene features, polytene chromosome lengths): Tajikistan Kachvoryan, Petrova & Chubareva (2003, notes on general polytene features, polytene chromosome lengths): Tajikistan Chubareva & Petrova (2008a, description, photos of metaphase and polytene complements, polytene chromosome lengths): Tajikistan Simulium petricolum (Rivosecchi) Dunbar (1965, cytodendrogram; as E. aureum ‘J’): (country unspecified) Leonhardt (1985, characterization, cytodendrogram, inversions mapped, male chiasmate meiosis, photo of partial IS, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as E. aureum ‘J’ [in part]): Greece, Italy, Madeira, Russia, Spain Leonhardt (1987, characterization, cytodendrogram, inversions mapped, male chiasmate meiosis, photo of IS partial, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as E. aureum ‘J’ [in part]): Greece, Ireland, Italy, Madeira, Russia, Spain Rothfels (1988, notes on mimic inversions, photo of partial IS): (country unspecified) Day, Mustapha & Post (2010, low-magnification photo of polytene complement): Britain (England) Adler, Cherairia, Arigue, Samraoui & Belqat (2015, characterization, chromosomal phylogeny, inversions mapped, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard): Morocco Simulium pilosum Knowlton & Rowe Dunbar (1958a, 1958b, characterization, idiogram, inversions mapped, origin of dichromosomic [n = 2] condition, photos of metaphase and polytene complements and all arms, resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as S. aureum ‘sibling B’): Canada Dunbar (1959, characterization; cytodendrogram; idiogram; inversions mapped; photos of CI, partial IIS, and ectopic pairing of centromeres; resolution relative to S. aureum group standard; as S. aureum ‘B’): Canada Dunbar (1962, chromosomal key, description, idio
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».