MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912814272 · doi:10.5284/1111695

199 Newhall Street, Harper's Hill, Jewellery Quarter, Birmingham B3: Historic Building Record, 2020

2022· article· en· W6912814272 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchaeology Data Service · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQuarter (Canadian coin)Block (permutation group theory)Principal (computer security)Range (aeronautics)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Historic Building Record of redundant, Grade II Listed office/manufactory building commensurate with a 'Level 3' survey as defined by HE, comprising textual account, drawn and photographic record combined with associated archival research. No. 199 Newhall Street is a Grade II Statutorily Listed Building lying within the 'Industrial Middle' zone of the Birmingham Jewellery Quarter Conservation Area; it has until recently formed part of the premises of Baker and Finnemore Ltd., a company with a history dating back to the mid-19th century, originally occupying premises at No. 1 James Street and historically involved in the manufacture of steel pens. It is located to the south-east extreme of the wider Harper's Hill site, where it occupies a prominent location at the south-east end of the street block bounded by Newhall Street, Brook Street and James Street, c.150m west of St. Peter's Square. The building complex comprises three principal elements; a three-storey office/workshop range fronting onto Newhall Street, built in a simplified and restrained Neo-Georgian style, a large, two-storey purpose-built workshop block fronting Brook Street and James Street with a distinctive 'saw-tooth' north-light roof, and a multi-phase, composite group of buildings to the north-west, fronting James Street and abutting the rear of the Newhall Street range. The combined block extends to c.830m2 and is centred on NGR SP 06355 87435. The site, formerly occupied by late-C18th/early-C19th residential housing around a central yard, first indicated on a map of c.1818, was bought by Baker and Finnemore in 1911, the year the firm was incorporated, and sequentially redeveloped shortly thereafter for industrial purposes. The earliest element of the extant complex was the two-storey workshop block, built to the designs of Ewen Harper and Bro., architects, of Corporation Street, Birmingham, with deposited drawings dated 1911; a series of associated buildings, though stylistically distinct, are included on contemporary design drawings and are thus assumed to be contemporary. The Newhall Street frontage block formed part of the original plan, being delineated on primary drawings, though it did not form part of initial works, being appended later over three discrete phases of development. The earliest phase comprised a two-storey, three-bay range, the southern three bays of the extant range, at the angle of Newhall Street and Brook Street, erected in c.1915; this was extended to the north by three bays in c.1936, and the full, six-bay range raised to three storeys in c.1948/9. Baker and Finnemore's premises were later further enlarged by the addition of substantial workshop ranges to the north and north-west of the historical core in the later 20th century, the whole site remaining in the company's occupation until 2020, immediately prior to recording related to the current study. The constituent buildings that comprises No. 199 Newhall Street present a group of significant historical interest and considerable architectural merit, the latter in particular with respect to the formal treatment of the Neo-Georgian Newhall Street frontage range, the presence of which was accentuated by its heightening in the late-1940s, and this is reflected in its designation as a Grade II Listed Building. The complex combines administrative accommodation with extensive manufacturing workshops, warehousing and stores in a purpose-built, composite site redolent of earlier, 19th-century 'integrated' manufactories.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,447
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0030,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,293
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchaeology Data ServiceMême sujetHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesTravaux en français237 207