MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6912963732 · doi:10.5284/1127356

A14 Cambridge to Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire: West of Ouse Landscape Block Archaeology Report Illustrations

2024· article· en· W6912963732 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchaeology Data Service · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueArchaeology and ancient environmental studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExcavationPotteryChronologyRadiocarbon datingBlock (permutation group theory)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Fieldwork: The total excavated area in the West of Ouse landscape block covered 19.3ha and the results of the geophysical survey and trenching evaluation were used to define the three targeted excavation areas (TEAs): TEA 14, TEA 15 and TEA 16. TEA 14 was machine stripped and hand excavated between October 2016 and January 2018. A small area within TEA 14 was not excavated, the north-east part of an old water main, as it was not impacted by construction. To the east, the majority of TEA 15 was stripped and excavated in stages between October 2016 and March 2018. A small triangle, 0.2ha, to the west of the site was excavated later in two phases between the 21st of September and 5th of October 2018, and the 8th-22nd January 2019. The land adjacent to the B1514 in TEA 15 was found to be contaminated by a former fuel depot. TEA 16 was machine stripped and hand excavated in various stages between November 2016 and June 2018 with an additional 0.3ha area to the north excavated from the end of March to the 9th of May 2019. A metal detector survey was carried out across all areas post-stripping. All works were undertaken in accordance with the Written Scheme of Investigation (Atkins CH2M 2016). Post-excavation: The preliminary grouping and stratigraphic sequencing of features presented in the Post-Excavation Assessment report (MHI 2019a) is superseded here. Stratigraphic information recorded on site has been complemented by the pottery and radiocarbon dates to provide a more detailed understanding of the chronology of the archaeology within the West of Ouse Landscape Block. In this report, archaeological features have been grouped and assigned to periods using standardised terms and numeration in line with scheme-wide methodology for the stratigraphic analysis using QGIS (MHI 2020). Chronological periods referred to in this report are based on the established period divisions used in Cambridgeshire and beyond and in consultation with our pottery specialists. Where necessary, some features have been sub-grouped to provide a more detailed understanding of specific features. Many features have also been assigned to a 'land use' and/or settlement which has enabled detailed analysis and comparisons of archaeological sites across the landscape blocks. The West of Ouse landscape block comprised three Targeted Excavation Areas (TEAs) covering 20 hectares spread over 1.5km on the river terrace that descends into the valley of the River Great Ouse to the south of Brampton (Figure 1). The archaeological features uncovered indicate earlier prehistoric movement along the river terrace, Bronze Age monuments and burials, Iron Age activity, extensive Roman settlement and Anglo-Saxon structures (Figure 4). These were overlain by the medieval furrows and truncated by the post-medieval and modern boundaries which enclosed the landscape. There is a distinct change in the nature of the archaeology towards the river, with later settlement (largely Roman) focused in TEA 14 to the west, whereas TEA 16 to the east was dominated by the Bronze Age barrow. The excavations revealed earlier prehistoric activity located adjacent to the River Great Ouse with an oblong Neolithic monument (Monument 1) overlain by a circular Bronze Age Barrow (TEA 16, Figures 4 and 7). The Barrow (Monument 2) comprised a mound surrounded by a deep ring-ditch. A group of six cremations were deposited in the early Bronze Age with funerary activity continuing into the middle Bronze Age when a significant cremation cemetery, comprising 51 cremation burials, was cut into the southeastern quadrant of the mound. The artefactual, environmental and osteological analysis along with the Bayesian modelling of the radiocarbon dates has provided insights into population and burial practices.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,119
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,253
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchaeology Data ServiceMême sujetArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesTravaux en français237 207