MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6913008214 · doi:10.5284/1104014

Report on archaeological evaluation at Victoria Road, Edmonton (VCR20)

2020· article· en· W6913008214 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchaeology Data Service · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSubsoilNatural (archaeology)LoamTopsoilCalcareniteTrenchPluckingPrehistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

An archaeological evaluation was carried out by MOLA at Victoria Road, Edmonton, London, N9 9PA ('the site') between 30.11.2020 and 02.12.2020. Three trenches were excavated and revealed four pits, three linear robber cuts and a brick/tile box drain. All features were post-medieval, dated c. 19th century to modern, and represented building activity, possible quarrying, and the site's use as gardens. The general sequence of deposits was consistent across the site: natural comprised orange sandy gravel (18), under a c. 300mm to 450mm thick layer of mid-brown sily clay subsoil (17), which was overlain a 300mm to 500mm think layer of dark brown loam topsoil with turf (16). The surface of untruncated natural gravel (18) was found at 13.59m OD in the south-east (Trench 1), rising to 13.79m OD in the west (Trench 2), and 13.99m OD in the north (Trench 3). Subsoil deposit (17) was found between 13.90m to 14.15m OD in Trench 1 and at between 14.20m and 14.50m OD in Trenches 2 and 3. Assessing the results from all the trenches, and dating evidence where it exists, it appears that scant archaeological remains survive on site. The finds assemblage from the site was very small and this material is exclusively post-medival and almost entirely 19th to 20th century in date. The function of pits found in Trenches 1 and 2 is unclear but pits [4] and [10] were stratigraphically late and may relate to garden activity, while pits [6] and [2] may be associated with quarrying dated to the 19th century and perhaps slightly earlier post-medieval period, respectively. The scattered presence of charcoal, CBM flecks, and occasional traces of animal bone through out the subsoil suggest that this layer may represent extensively reworked and redeposited brickearth. Little evidence survives of the 19th century buildings seen on the OS map of 1867 (see Fig 4), which stood on the site prior to the construction of Victoria Road and the extant houses, as seen on the OS map of 1897 (not illustrated). No foundations, floor surfaces or other structure features related to these buildings were found. The rubble and mortar layer (20), located beneath topsoil and subsoil in Trench 2, probably represents a trample layer formed during the demolition. The robbing out of the buildings appears to have been unusually thorough and wide-spread and is represented by cuts [8]/[15] and [12], which appear to have entirely removed the foundations, as well as the almost complete removal of drain (13), which was presumably associated with the buildings. The vast majority of the building material from the demolition does not appear to have remained on site. Robbing out could have salvaged some building material with intrinsic value, such as bricks, but may have been chiefly for another purpose. Such rubble would have been an extremely convenient material for the raising of the ground over Milestone Alley and the creation of Victoria Road directly adjacent to the west of the site in the late 19th century

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,836
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,130
Tête enseignante GPT0,356
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchaeology Data ServiceMême sujetHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesTravaux en français237 207