Association of inotrope use with neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants <29 weeks gestation: a retrospective cohort study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The primary objective was to compare neurodevelopmental (ND) outcomes at 18–24 months in preterm infants <29 weeks gestational age (GA) who received versus those who did not receive inotropes in the first week of life. The secondary objective was to assess ND outcomes according to the duration of inotropic support in the first week of life (≤3 or >3 days). Retrospective population-based cohort study of preterm infants <29 weeks GA admitted to participating neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) from January 2010 to September 2011 with follow-up data available at 18–24 months. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-Third Edition (BSID-III). Long-term outcomes were categorized as neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) and significant neurodevelopmental impairment (sNDI), and effect modification due to other neonatal morbidities including receipt of antenatal steroids, GA, small for gestational age (SGA) status, sex, score for neonatal acute physiology (SNAP-II) >20, postnatal steroids, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade ≥3/periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), early- and late-onset sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was assessed. Maternal and infant demographic characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes were compared using Pearson’s Chi-square test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test or the Wilcoxon rank test for continuous variables. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using multivariable regression analysis. Of the 491 (18.7%) eligible preterm infants who received inotropes during the first week of life, 314 (64%) survived to NICU discharge and 245 (78%) had ND outcome data available. A total of 1775 eligible preterm infants did not receive inotropes in the first week of life; 1647 (92.7%) survived to NICU discharge and 1149 (70%) had ND outcome data. Maternal and infant characteristics associated with infants receiving inotropes included: younger maternal age, clinical chorioamnionitis, no antenatal steroids, outborn, lower GA, BW and Apgar scores at both one and five minutes; and higher SNAP-II scores (p < .05). Infants who received inotropes in the first week of life were more likely to be require postnatal steroids, had higher rates of BPD, IVH grade ≥3/PVL, early- and late-onset sepsis, ROP, NEC and mortality (p < .05). Infants who received inotropes in the first week of life also had higher rates of sensorineural or mixed hearing loss with an AOR (95% CI) of 1.99 (1.13, 3.49). After adjusting for confounding variables, there was no difference in the risk of NDI or sNDI between infants who did and did not receive inotropes in the first week of life. Of the infants with neurodevelopmental outcome data available, 186 received inotropes for ≤3 days and 59 for >3 days. After adjusting for confounding variables there was no difference in the risk of NDI or sNDI. Infants who received inotropes for >3 days were more likely to have lower BSID-III cognitive [AOR 2.43 95% CI (1.03, 5.76)] and motor scores <85 [AOR 2.38 95% CI (1.07, 5.30)] respectively. In this large, population-based cohort, infants who received inotropes in the first week of life were at increased risk for sensorineural or mixed hearing loss. There was no difference in NDI or sNDI after adjusting for confounding variables. A longer duration of inotrope use in the first week of life was associated with lower BSID-III cognitive and motor scores, but no difference in overall NDI or sNDI.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».