MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6921177620 · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.29365718.v3

Extracting and classifying spatial language terms from planning documents

2025· article· en· W6921177620 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueFigshare · 2025
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGeographic Information Systems Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeospatial analysisPipeline (software)Process (computing)Urban planningPlan (archaeology)Domain (mathematical analysis)Expression (computer science)Natural language

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs)present new opportunities to advance text-based analyses, particularly for identify-ing and disambiguating geospatial information expressed as natural language text.This study explores the capabilities of an LLM to identify, classify, and create map-based representations of geospatial expressions found in urban planning documents.As a profession concerned with the spatial arrangement and interrelationships ofhuman activities, land uses, and environmental systems, much of the regulatoryinformation, professional expertise, and local knowledge that urban planning en-codes as text in reports and plans is geographic in nature. Interpreting and cross-referencing the geographic information in these documents is challenging and timeconsuming for both domain professionals (e.g., planners, lawyers) and communitymembers. This paper presents an automated pipeline that was developed to assessan LLM’s ability to extract geospatial expressions, determine their relevant spatialscale (micro, meso, macro), and to identify urban features referenced by a specificdevelopment proposal. Three types of planning documents were examined from amid-sized city (Kitchener, Ontario, Canada), namely a City-authored Official Plan(OP), private consultants’ development proposal reports, and transcripts from pub-lic meetings. A custom Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) model was createdto process text hierarchically, extracting explicit and implicit geospatial expressionswith varying accuracy (e.g., F1-scores ranging from 0.440 to 0.800 across sources). Amulti-agent architecture, leveraging tools like Nominatim and DuckDB, was used toconvert these expressions into SQL queries and map representations. Results revealdistinct patterns in expression types and scales across document types, with OPdocuments favoring macro-scale expressions, plan justification reports emphasizingmicro-scale details, and public meeting transcripts reflecting informal micro-to-mesoreferences. While LLMs demonstrate strong potential, challenges such as factual in-consistencies, attribute errors, and context limitations highlight the need for humanoversight and improved metadata integration. This work advances the understand-ing of LLMs in geospatial analysis and highlights the potential to enhance urbanplanning processes through automated interpretation of geographic expressions intext create_vector_store -> explained in figure 4 # Policy Encoder This repository provides tools and pipelines for extracting, encoding, and querying geospatial policy data using LLMs and DuckDB with spatial extensions. ## Features - **PDF Extraction**: Extracts geospatial expressions and scales from policy documents. - **Geospatial Data Import**: Loads GeoJSON, GPKG, and other geospatial files into DuckDB as spatial tables. - **Metadata Export**: Exports table schemas and geometry columns to JSON for downstream use. - **GeoJSON Export**: Exports DuckDB tables with geometry columns as GeoJSON files. - **LLM Integration**: Uses LangChain and OpenAI models for geospatial language understanding and SQL generation. - **Agent-based Querying**: Modular agent workflow for geocoding, spatial language detection, and spatial SQL querying. ## Folder Structure ``` scripts/ agents/ constants/ create_figure_7.py create_figure_8.py create_vector_store.py extract_expressions_and_scale.py geocoder.py prepare_duckdb_db.py prompts.py test.py table_schema.json sqls/ split_language/ scale/ maps/ input_files/ data/ csv/ ``` | Folder | Description | |----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | `scripts/` | Main Python scripts for data processing, extraction, database preparation, and LLM workflows. | | `scripts/agents/` | Agent modules for geocoding, spatial language detection, and spatial SQL generation. | | `scripts/constants/` | Configuration files for paths, LLM settings, and input files. | | `sqls/` | Saved SQL queries and outputs generated by the system or agents. | | `split_language/` | Intermediate files and outputs related to spatial language splitting and detection. | | `scale/` | Intermediate files and outputs for scale extraction and analysis. | | `maps/` | Map images, figures, and visualizations used in the project. | | `input_files/` | Raw input documents such as policy texts and justification reports. | | `data/` | Geospatial data files (GeoJSON, GPKG, etc.) and DuckDB database files. | | `csv/` | Intermediate CSV files containing extracted policies, scales, spatial language, ## Setup 1. **Install dependencies** Recommended: Python 3.10+ ```sh pip install -r requirements.txt ``` 2. **Set up environment variables** - Add your OpenAI API key and other secrets as needed. You can set it up in the `scripts/constants/llm_config.py` and replace the value for `OPEN_AI_API_KEY` 3. **Prepare Data** - The paper's geospatial files (GeoJSON, GPKG, etc.) are in the `data/` directory. - The current model only reads from the Official plan file. you can replace it in the `scripts/constants/input_files.py` file and replace your new policy file for `PLAN_JUSTIFICATION` variable. - Make sure to set `PARENT_DIR` correctly in the root folder ## Usage ### 1. Import Geospatial Data into DuckDB Run: ```sh python scripts/prepare_duckdb_db.py ``` - This will import all geospatial files from `data/` into a DuckDB database and export metadata to `db_metadata.json`. - Later you can add correct table and column descriptions to the `db_metadata.json` and save it as `table_schema.json`. this file will be fed to the llm. The current `table_schema.json` is already filled with necessary data. ### 2. Extract Geospatial Expressions from Policy Documents Run: ```sh python scripts/extract_expressions_and_scale.py ``` - This will process the specified PDF and extract geospatial expressions and their scales. ### 3. Querying with Agents - See [`scripts/test.py`](scripts/test.py) and [`scripts/create_figure_7.py`](scripts/create_figure_7.py) for examples of agent-based workflows that: - Geocode locations - Detect geospatial language - Generate and execute spatial SQL queries on DuckDB # 4. Figures and tables - [`scripts/create_figure_7.py`](scripts/create_figure_7.py) is used for an example of the figure 7 data. The logs of this file is converted to the figure 7 - [`scripts/create_figure_8_table3_4.py`](scripts/create_figure_8_table3_4.py) is used for an example of the figure 8 data. I generates one of the graph images and also exports an example data for the table 3 and 4 - [`answers-justification_spatial_languages.xlsx`](answers-justification_spatial_languages.xlsx) is used for evaluation of the table 2 and 5 for the plan justification data - [`answers-op_spatial_languages.xlsx`](answers-op_spatial_languages.xlsx) is used for evaluation of the table 2 and 5 for the official plan data - [`answers-transcript_spatial_languages.xlsx`](answers-transcript_spatial_languages.xlsx) is used for evaluation of the table 2 and 5 for the transcript data - [`Figure 9.xlsx`](Figure 9.xlsx) This includes a simple copy of the data from previous `xls` files into new file to create figure 9 - for the `Table 6` sample sql queries from `scripts/create_figure_7.py` is selected and visualized in the Qgis. ## Customization - **Prompts**: Modify or extend prompts in [`scripts/prompts.py`](scripts/prompts.py). - **LLM Configs**: Set your LLM endpoints and parameters in [`scripts/constants/llm_configs.py`](scripts/constants/llm_configs.py). - **Input Files**: Configure paths in [`scripts/constants/input_files.py`](scripts/constants/input_files.py). ## License MIT License --- **Contact:** For questions or contributions, please contact the author

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,015
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,030

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0070,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,360
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFigshareMême sujetGeographic Information Systems StudiesTravaux en français237 207