MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6921745840 · doi:10.7939/r3-bgax-hd61

Assessment of empirically-derived parameters and their transferability in mountain glacier modeling and application for regional melt projections under climate change scenarios

2023· dissertation· en· W6921745840 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2023
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueCryospheric studies and observations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGlacierClimate changeScale (ratio)Range (aeronautics)TransferabilityClimate modelScaling

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Mountain glaciers, key sources of freshwater to downstream ecosystems and users, are responsive and vulnerable to changes in climate. Understanding their current influence, their potential future changes, and consequences of those changes are all important research goals, so many modeling approaches have been developed to address these questions. However, modeling at the regional scale can be difficult since input data from field measurements is limited and there is high spatiotemporal variability. High uncertainty in model predictions can come from empirical modeling parameters, often based on limited observations which are then applied to other glaciers in potentially very different topographic settings. In this study, we aim to assess parameter uncertainty and transferability by revisiting empirical parameters that are commonly used in glacier modeling and explore potential future glacier behaviours by utilizing a range of values for each glacier modeling parameter. This approach allows us to quantify uncertainty bands due to both projected future climate uncertainty and predicted model uncertainty. First, rather than using a set of single parameter values we explore a range for the value of each parameter based on their physically meaningful maximum and minimum values. We set up a modeling framework by coupling glacier melt, surface mass balance, and spline-based volume-area scaling (called evolution hereafter), denoted as CGME model for Coupled Glacier Mass-balance Evolution model, to predict glacier melt runoff. Within the CGME model, we evaluate two temperature-index melt modeling approaches: the Classical Temperature Index Model (CTIM), which uses a degree-day approach, and the Pellicciotti Temperature-Index Model (PTIM), which incorporates radiative melt factors. Our study area is the Athabasca River Basin in Alberta, Canada, which contains 258 glaciers. After calibration and optimization, we find that both of the melt models used in our CGME model predicted similar ranges of uncertainty (i.e., 95 Percent Prediction Uncertainty, 95PPU) in melt runoff, but the CTIM-based model reproduced more observed data points within its prediction uncertainty range (71% of observed data were captured within the predicted 95PPU) whereas the PTIM-based model reproduced 31% of the observed data. Second, we applied these optimized parameter ranges at the regional scale for the period 1984-2007. Approximately 63% of the glaciers in the region had a normalized uncertainty value of greater than 0.5 for melt runoff, indicating that the parameter range transferability is not appropriate for the majority of glaciers in the region and that small glaciers are especially sensitive to input parameter variability. The framework developed here assesses the parameter transferability issue, especially in catchments where small-sized glaciers are dominant contributors to downstream water-ways that may have a cumulative ecological impact. Further, we explore the impact of potential future change. The glacier model is forced using 4 CMIP6 GCMs under two shared socioeconomic pathways scenarios (SSP126 and SSP585) for the 258 glaciers for the period 1980-2100. From the maximum physically meaningful range for each parameter, 100 sets of model input parameters are sampled using Latin Hypercube Sampling technique. The 100 sets of sampled parameters are used with the future projected and downscaled climate data to force 100 simulations using CGME model for each glacier. This allows us to assess the projections’ ranges of uncertainty (using the 95PPU) stemming from input parameterization. Glacier changes are assessed based on two categorizations: glacier initial area and glacier initial elevation. Our results, based on size, show that glaciers are predicted to decrease in volume 75-80%, decrease in area 72-78%, and discharge 70-80% of their potential melt runoff in the first forty years of the simulation period (1980-2019, the historical period). Monthly predicted flow regimes not only indicate greatly reduced melt runoff as the century progresses, but also the loss of late spring and early fall melt runoff. Assessing potential changes by glacier initial elevation indicated similar trends, though low elevation glaciers are predicted to be especially responsive, discharging ~95% of their melt runoff during the historical period. Monthly melt runoff reflects similar trends to those found during size analysis, though low elevation glaciers have the most extreme response. These assessments show the potential range of glacier changes under various future climate scenarios and the uncertainty stemming from model parameterizations. This can assist with freshwater resource management as well as adaptation and mitigation planning and implementation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,023

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,041
Tête enseignante GPT0,245
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetCryospheric studies and observationsTravaux en français237 207