MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6922090813 · doi:10.7939/81953

Onîkihikomâwiwin (Parenthood): Researching and Understanding Approaches to Raising Children in Alexander First Nation

2025· dissertation· en· W6922090813 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2025
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueEducational Robotics and Engineering
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousParticipatory action researchRaising (metalworking)Context (archaeology)Perspective (graphical)First nationCulturally appropriatePositivism

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To be evidence-based, practices, programs, decisions, and policies aimed at supporting parents and families must be based on the best existing evidence on parenting within the context of individual factors, including culture. Parenting research has a history of being positivist and based on Eurocentric and Western samples, conceptualizations, theories, ways of knowing, and ways of being. Although research suggests that some aspects of parenting are universal, the form and function of parenting behaviours and dimensions have been found to vary across cultures. In Canada, Indigenous peoples, families, communities, and cultures have persisted through and been impacted by historical and ongoing colonization, forced assimilation, cultural genocide, and systemic racism. Indigenous children and families are overrepresented in child welfare systems and there are few culturally safe parenting programs whose effectiveness has been researched, thereby perpetuating these cycles of harm. Although high-quality research on Indigenous parenting that avoids deficit-theorizing and blanket statements is growing, more research is needed to build our understanding of the unique parenting approaches, strengths, and needs in diverse Indigenous communities. Such research can help inform and reform existing practices, programs, decisions, and policies affecting Indigenous families. However, to ensure the research and its results are valid, meaningful, and ethical, the research must itself be culturally safe by being done with, by, and for Indigenous communities based on their epistemologies, ontologies, axiologies, and methodologies. This dissertation consists of two papers describing the processes and results of an Indigenous community-based participatory research (CBPR) study on child-rearing in Alexander First Nation (AFN) from the perspective of eleven community members. The overarching purpose of this dissertation is to share the community’s approach to research and child-rearing, with the hope that (a) the knowledge generated in this study can be used by AFN to support the children, youth, and families in their community, (b) the research processes can provide a case example to parenting researchers of how research understanding Indigenous child-rearing can be conducted, and (c) the knowledge can add to a literature base on Indigenous child-rearing that can play a role in changing harmful and systemically racist practices, programs, decisions, and policies. The first of the two papers focuses on the processes of the research study. It provides an overview of the history of research done on Indigenous peoples, including in parenting research, followed by a brief review of CBPR and Indigenous approaches to research. Then the processes (including successes, challenges, and reflections) of the current Indigenous CBPR study are described including building relationship with the Alexander Research Committee (ARC) and AFN community, designing the study, recruitment, data generation, Indigenous thematic analysis processes, and knowledge mobilization. The second paper focuses on the results of the study. The study aimed to answer the following three research questions: 1. What are the cultural and traditional beliefs, values, and practices related to child-rearing and child development held and used by the people in AFN? 2. How do these beliefs, values, and practices reflect strengths and developmentally-supportive child-rearing in AFN? 3. How has colonization and intergenerational trauma impacted the intergenerational transmission of traditional child-rearing practices in AFN? Tipi teachings received from people within AFN were used as the study’s guiding Indigenous theorizing. The Indigenous CBPR approach included relational sampling, interviews with each of the 11 participating individuals (all of whom identified as women) based in the conversational method, and Indigenous thematic analysis. Four themes emerged, thematically represented by a tipi: (a) Defining Tipi Pole Roles (Mothering); (b) Cooperation Between the Poles, the Environment, and the Land (Community Approach to Raising Children); (c) The Hide (Supporting Child Development); and (d) Maintaining a Sturdy Tipi (Healing Intergenerational Trauma). These findings capture the strengths and developmental support present in the approaches to child-rearing in AFN, which will be mobilized to benefit the community in partnership with the ARC.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,987
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,035

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,005
Communication savante0,0040,005
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,101
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,122 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2025
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Alberta LibraryMême sujetEducational Robotics and EngineeringTravaux en français237 207