An Investigation into the Application and Environmental Impact of the UBC Mugshare Program
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In order to evaluate the viability of the Mugshare program at the University of British Columbia’s Vancouver campus, the program should be analysed using a triple bottom line assessment involving environmental, social, and economical factors. The scope of this report is analyzing the public awareness of the program, the economic feasibility of the current deposit, and environmental impacts of using reusable stainless steel mugs. The methods used in this analysis are gathered from academic articles, and trusted web resources. The topics mentioned above are examined in detail, with a slight emphasis on evaluating the presently used stainless steel mugs. The goal of the Mugshare program is to reduce the waste created on campus by the incorrect disposal of single-use paper cups. Currently, the Mugshare program seeks to do this by lending out 14 ounce reusable stainless steel mugs with a five dollar deposit. Stainless steel mugs are presently the best option for such a program, with long-term durability and little to no long-term adverse health hazards, however, the high energy consumption and emissions associated with production make it necessary to examine alternatives to ensure this is the best choice for the Mugshare program. If stainless steel mugs will continue being used by the Mugshare program, the cost, design, and monitoring will need to be improved to further benefit the program. Currently, the deposit to participate in the program is five dollars, however if the program is going to continue to be economically feasible, such a deposit should be raised. On a related note, the design of the mug currently incorporates a rubber bottom, with a plastic lining. Such lining and rubber bottom should be removed to reduce the deterioration of the mug. A potential issue for the Mugshare program is the monitoring and tracking of the mugs. Efficient tracking methods such as implementing a barcode into the design of the mug, and linking said barcode to UBC student cards are outlined in this report. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».