三峡ダム建設をめぐる二つのドキュメンタリー映画にみる「他者」の声 : 『 秉愛』とUp the Yangtze
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper focuses on “others,” the people depicted in two documentary films about the construction of the Three Gorges Dam, 『秉愛』(Bing Ai, 2007) by Chinese filmmaker Feng Yan, and Up the Yangtze (2007) by Chinese Canadian filmmaker Yung Chang. Chapters 1 and 2 examine the uniqueness of each work, and Chapter 3 investigates their similarities and differences. Both directors have roots in China and both released their films in 2007, the year after the dam was completed. However, the directors differ in terms of their nationality, gender, age, and social background. Further, by visualizing the different types of watershed residents they focus on, we elucidate the attitudes shown in the respective films.\nWe first review the background of the film in order to understand Feng’s 『秉愛』 representation and then rethink three points: the lack of music used in the film, the lack of adequate image and sound processing, and the visualization of not only 秉愛, who continues to resist the government’s recommendation and is later ordered to relocate, but also the residents who are forced to face the same situation. In addition, it is pointed out that Feng contrasts Chinese government officials with the residents, highlighting the economic, educational, and cognitive disparities that arise between them.\nOn the other hand, this paper analyzes the representation of the sightseeing boats on the Yangtze River in Up the Yangtze, after reviewing the background of the film. In fact, since this film serves more as a narrative than a documentary, viewers could associate it with the Bible. However, in Up the Yangtze, it is not God who puts the world in danger of being submerged, but human who have constructed the largest dam in the world and sought a more comfortable, secure, and modern life. In addition, the film shows foreign tourists visiting an apartment complex for farmers relocated from a flooded area. Through this depiction, Yung demonstrates the reality of farmers who are forced to cultivate crops with which they are inexperienced, in a new land.\nTo further discuss the two films, we examine the following three aspects and explains the similarities and differences: the filmmaker’s point of view, the relationship to the Chinese economy and capitalism, and the positions presented by the Feng and Yung. It can be seen that『秉愛』is a long-term, in-depth story of a poor woman living in the Three Gorges region before the completion of the dam, documenting the situation of migration from a local perspective by a filmmaker who is also Chinese but from the middle class (and above) and educated in China or Japan. Up the Yangtze, in contrast, depicts the Chinese transition to a consumerist, capitalist economy before and after the completion of the dam and its impact on the residents of the Three Gorges region from an outside perspective, that is, from the perspective of Canadians who have enjoyed the affluence of a capitalist society. The two films show implications of the complex Chinese social context behind the dam’s construction in detail. Further study of films depicting similar themes is needed in order to shed light on the massive phenomenon of the Three Gorges Dam from more diverse perspectives.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,025 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».