MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6924858278 · doi:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2023.03.004

Effect of Bending on Shoot Growth, Flowering and Fruiting of Xianjinfeng Litchi

2023· article· en· W6924858278 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Établissements canadiensMinistry of Agriculture
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésShootOrchardGerminationPruningApical dominanceRipening

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

【Objective】Xianjinfeng litchi is a new variety introduced in recent years. It is characterized by high quality and late ripening and has significant economic and social benefits in the middle and late ripening litchi producing areas, however, its efficient and high-yield cultivation technology needs to be studied. Shoot bending is an important shaping and pruning method in orchard management, which can effectively reduce the apex dominance and facilitate flowering and fruiting. Here, the effects of different bending treatments on Xianjinfeng litchi were explored in order to provide references for the application of shoot bending technology as well as the establishment of technology for stable and high yield.【Method】Xianjinfeng litchi grafted for four years was used as the test material, and three bending treatments were set: vertical (0°, CK), horizontal (90 °) and drooping (110 °). After treatments, the indicators including growth, flowering rate, and fruit setting rate were counted.【Result】Compared with the vertical treatment (CK), drooping and horizontal treatments had limited effects on the vegetative growth of the first and second shoots, but delayed the germination of the third shoot (the last autumn shoot) for more than seven days, and dramatically reduced germination number of shoots at the same time. In addition, drooping treatment had the strongest inhibitory effect. When the leaves of the last autumn shoot were mature, the branch diameter under bending treatments was slightly lower than that under CK, however, and there were no significant difference among all treatments. Both drooping and horizontal bending treatments could effectively control the length of the last autumn shoot to about 15 cm, promote the growth of short and medium shoots, which was conducive to flowering and fruiting. In the coming spring, the flowering rate and fruit setting rate of drooping and horizontal treatments were notably higher than those of vertical treatment (CK). The flowering rate of droop treatment reached 100%, and all of them were pure flowers with high quality, while vertical treatment (CK) produced more panicles with leaves in comparison with the other two treatments. There was no significant difference in the length of panicle among different treatments, however, the base diameter of panicle were observably reduced and vigorous growth of panicles were inhibited by bending treatments. Fifty days after blooming of pistillate flowers, the fruit setting rates under drooping and horizontal treatments were 9.81% and 7.61%, respectively, markedly higher than that under vertical treatment (CK, 5.54%).【Conclusion】For Xianjinfeng litchi, drooping and horizontal branch bending can effectively control the excessive growth of parent branches, improve the quality of flowers, and significantly increase fruit setting rate. The best results are obtained under drooping treatment (110°).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,104
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,346
Tête enseignante GPT0,616
Écart entre enseignants0,270 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Même sujetContemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeTravaux en français237 207