Does dietitian involvement during pregnancy improve birth outcomes? A systematic review
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Healthy pregnancies can be achieved through sufficient weight gain, balanced diets, appropriate vitamin and mineral supplementation, avoidance of alcohol and harmful substances, as well as food safety (Procter et al., 2014). While most prenatal care providers do not have substantial training in nutrition, we believe that registered dietitians being healthcare professionals, can assist pregnant patients in attaining optimal birth outcomes. In Canada and the US, registered dietitians are not required members of health care teams for prenatal care, but can be referred to for medical nutrition therapy to assist women with weight gain, hyperemesis, multiple gestations, poor dietary patterns, and chronic disease (Procter et al, 2014). Given their expertise in nutrition and the importance of nutrition during pregnancy, registered dietitians have the potential to positively influence birth outcomes. However, studies supporting their roles have not been comprehensively evaluated (Pari-Keener et al., 2020) and existing studies have been inconsistent. Some studies have supported that interventions provided by dietitians improve infant birth outcomes. Research by Vesco et al. suggests that intensive dietary intervention initiated by dietitians is associated with a decrease in prevalence of large-for-gestational age infants (9%) compared to groups receiving only one-time dietary advice (26%) (2014). Additionally, research by Crowther et al. shows a significantly low incidence of large-for-gestational age (13%) and macrosomia (10%) infants as a result of dietitian involvement compared to its control group (22% and 21%) (2005). However, other studies indicate no effect on infant or maternal outcomes (Koivusalo et al., 2016; Dodd, Deussen & Louise, 2019). So far, no systematic review has directly studied the effect of dietitian involvement on birth outcomes. Thus, this review will examine the extent to which dietitian involvement during pregnancy is associated with improved birth outcomes. References Crowther, C. A., Hiller, J. E., Moss, J. R., McPhee, A. J., Jeffries, W. S., Robinson, J. S., & Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group (2005). Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. The New England journal of medicine, 352(24), 2477–2486. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa042973 Dodd, J. M., Deussen, A. R., & Louise, J. (2019). A Randomised Trial to Optimise Gestational Weight Gain and Improve Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes through Antenatal Dietary, Lifestyle and Exercise Advice: The OPTIMISE Randomised Trial. Nutrients, 11(12), 2911. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11122911 Koivusalo, S. B., Rönö, K., Klemetti, M. M., Roine, R. P., Lindström, J., Erkkola, M., Kaaja, R. J., Pöyhönen-Alho, M., Tiitinen, A., Huvinen, E., Andersson, S., Laivuori, H., Valkama, A., Meinilä, J., Kautiainen, H., Eriksson, J. G., & Stach-Lempinen, B. (2016). Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Can Be Prevented by Lifestyle Intervention: The Finnish Gestational Diabetes Prevention Study (RADIEL): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes care, 39(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0511 Pari-Keener, M., Gallo, S., Stahnke, B., McDermid, J. M., Al-Nimr, R. I., Moreschi, J. M., Hakeem, R., Handu, D., & Cheng, F. W. (2020). Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes Associated with Medical Nutrition Therapy by Registered Dietitian Nutritionists in Pregnant Women with Malnutrition: An Evidence Analysis Center Systematic Review. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 120(10), 1730–1744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2019.10.024 Procter, S. B., & Campbell, C. G. (2014). Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: nutrition and lifestyle for a healthy pregnancy outcome. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 114(7), 1099–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2014.05.005 Vesco, K. K., Karanja, N., King, J. C., Gillman, M. W., Leo, M. C., Perrin, N., McEvoy, C. T., Eckhardt, C. L., Smith, K. S., & Stevens, V. J. (2014). Efficacy of a group-based dietary intervention for limiting gestational weight gain among obese women: a randomized trial. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 22(9), 1989–1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20831
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,015 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle