Exploring the use of CGM-based biological feedback for improving health behaviors: A scoping review protocol
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Biological feedback is increasingly being used as a behavior change technique within personalized health interventions. One form of biological feedback that has recently become more accessible is continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), which can be used to provide individuals with insights on the impact of various behaviors (e.g., diet, physical activity) on glucose levels. Nevertheless, there is little guidance on how CGM is implemented within interventions that address health behaviors. Objectives: The objectives of this scoping review are to (1) identify the populations where CGM has been used as a behavior change tool, and (2) characterize how CGM is implemented within interventions to address behavior. Methods: A search strategy was developed to capture studies incorporating the use of CGM-based biological feedback to promote health behavior change. The search was implemented within the following electronic databases: Elsevier Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EBSCOhost PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Additional studies were captured by examining the bibliographies of relevant reviews. Two trained reviewers used DistillerSR® (Evidence Partners; Ottawa, Canada) to screen studies for eligibility and extract data. Eligible studies were primary analyses of randomized controlled trials conducted in humans ≥18 years that included CGM-based biological feedback to promote behavior change as part of the intervention. Data extracted from eligible articles were focused on the methodology used to implement the intervention and control group (e.g., duration of CGM wear, format and frequency of feedback, etc.). Results: Database searches were completed in January 2024. A total of 3,995 abstracts were screened. Data from 32 included articles was extracted and is currently being analyzed. The scoping review is planned for completion in 2024. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this will be the first scoping review to describe the characteristics of how CGM is being used within interventions promoting behavior change. Results can be used to guide the design and implementation of future interventions incorporating the use of CGM-based biological feedback aimed at addressing health behaviors.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle