MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6925637846 · doi:10.17638/03161313

We All Shine On: Supporting International Student Voices in an Academic Context

2022· article· en· W6925637846 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Liverpool · 2022
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueViolence, Religion, and Philosophy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCommunication apprehensionAnxietyWillingness to communicateContext (archaeology)Class (philosophy)Public speakingExploratory researchPerceptionFirst languageLanguage acquisition

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The primary aim of this research is to support English as an Additional Language (EAL) student oral communication on the campus of a small teaching and learning university on the West Coast of Canada, where students have reported experiencing language anxiety (LA), which is the apprehension that an interlocutor gets when engaging or preparing to engage in communication in a language that is not their mother tongue. Studies have reported that their LA can result in communication avoidance and impede language use. In this research, LA is associated with the variables described in theories around willingness to communicate (WTC), which includes group and personal factors. However, my findings uncovered other additional elements. The objectives of the study were two-fold: (i) to investigate the students’ perceptions of using English in their academic classes and other settings where language anxiety often arises; and (ii) to explore the students’ strategy use both before and during the study to lower their language anxiety and support communication. To achieve my research objectives, I conducted a qualitative exploratory study using action learning with 5 participants from different nationalities who were recruited by attending voluntary workshops on strategies for oral academic communication. Each participant was involved in five semi-structured interviews. During the first of the interviews the participants were asked to complete the Public Speaking Class Anxiety Scale (PSCAS) to assess their degree of language anxiety and note specific effects of language anxiety in need of attention. Significant answers were discussed. Next, participants were then asked to complete the Academic Spoken English Strategies Survey (ASESS), to subsequently choose a strategy as an intervention to utilize, and then note the results weekly. At second, third, and fourth interviews, the participants shared their experiences around their use of the intervention, any changes they made to the intervention, or significant experiences they had had in academic communication during the investigated period. They concluded the interviews by choosing to continue working on the same aspect of language anxiety with the same intervention, or to make changes and repeat the cycle. In the last interview, the participants completed the PSCAS again and discussed any changes revealed from the first to last interview. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interview data. The findings revealed a high degree of strategy use before the study and the limited effect that additional strategy use had on reducing language anxiety and supporting corresponding oral communication during the study. Instead, speaking was primarily affected by intercultural relationships, individualized culture, and multilevel context. This led to reconsidering the WTC pyramid to incorporate these cultural and contextual variables; highlighting theories around small culture and their ultimate affect on community and connection; and noting significance of specific context, particularly the academic classroom, and its effect on identity, power and connection.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,777
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2022
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of LiverpoolMême sujetViolence, Religion, and PhilosophyTravaux en français237 207