Users, Gender, and Access: Ottawa's Public Transportation History from 1891 to 2011
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Users, Gender, and Access: Ottawa's Public Transportation History from 1891 to 2011 is a study focused on mobility technologies and services, changing passenger demographics, and issues of access. This work spans from 1891, when electric streetcars were first introduced in the City of Ottawa, to 2011, when OC Transpo's fleet was deemed fully accessible as its conventional fleet was entirely made up of low-floor buses. Over this period, the city and its public transportation offerings witnessed and responded to notable changes in passenger demographics, disability-led legislation regarding design and access, and fluctuations, growth, and resistance to established and new relationships between gender, users, and mobility technologies. This study is informed by critical concepts and frameworks from Feminist Technology Studies, Feminist Disability Studies, and Science and Technology Studies. As a collective, these studies inform a fluid appreciation of the nuanced and intricate ways in which technology and users shape and are shaped by one another, with respect to different spaces, places, and time periods. These insights support Users, Gender, and Access's attempt to understand and appreciate more recent gendered experiences of urban mobility within the history, legacy, and context of the need, development, and purpose of Ottawa's early public transportation efforts. In order to explore this history, this study relies on a rich variety of primary sources through a mix-method approach. Archival material pulled from the City of Ottawa Archives, as the primary repository for the city's operational material, alongside oral history interviews and first-person perspectives presented in newspapers offer unique insights for this work. These sources are studied alongside the rich material culture provided by a number of key artifacts and technologies, which ground this study in the built environment and sensorial experience of mobility. Ultimately, Users, Gender, and Access presents a case study for examining the history of access and inclusion, or a lack there of, which is informed by the fluid relationship between users and technology. It offers a unique contribution to the wider fields of transportation, material culture, gender, and disability by demonstrating the value of tracing the history of socio-technical artifacts. As this work argues, decision made in the late 1800s, that were informed by gendered and ableist appreciations of urban mobility and the role of public transportation, continue to influence how this technology is appreciated and experienced in the present.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle