Socially withdrawn children: Actual versus perceived peer acceptance
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The goal of the present study was to examine and directly compare actual peer acceptance and perceived peer acceptance in peer-identified withdrawn, aggressive, and nondeviant children. The children also rated how important it was for them to be liked by each of their peers. It was hypothesized that withdrawn children would underestimate their degree of acceptance in the peer group and would rate importance of peer acceptance higher compared to aggressive and nondeviant children. Children's self-reported social anxiety was also explored as a way of examining its effect on their perceptions of how they thought they were perceived by their peers. Participants included 479 children from Grades 3, 5, and 7 from middle-class elementary and junior high schools in the Western Quebec School Board. These children completed a peer assessment measure of social behaviour, a self-report measure of social anxiety, and sociometric rating measures of peer acceptance ("actual" peer acceptance, "perceived" peer acceptance, and "importance" of peer acceptance). Using a peer assessment measure of social behaviour, three groups of children were identified: (1) withdrawn (n = 68); (2) aggressive (n = 70); and (3) nondeviant (n = 242). When directly comparing children's actual versus perceived peer acceptance, contrary to our hypothesis, results showed no significant difference for withdrawn children. Conversely, aggressive children perceived themselves to be significantly better liked by their peers than they actually were, while results showed that nondeviant children were significantly better liked by their peers than they perceived themselves to be. The results also showed that aggressive children believed it was significantly less important for them to be liked by their peers compared to withdrawn children. Moreover, withdrawn children had significantly higher scores on social anxiety (i.e., social anxiety total score, and social avoidance and distress specific to new peers or situations and general situations) than aggressive or nondeviant children. Implications of the present findings and directions for future research are discussed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».