MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6926268205 · doi:10.20381/ruor-29700

Policymaking in Ontario for Older Adults' Self-Management of Disease and Disability Using Information and Communication Technologies

2023· dissertation· fr· W6926268205 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languefr
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHealth careContext (archaeology)Public policyPublic healthHealth policyInformation and Communications TechnologyConceptual frameworkPopulation healthPopulation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Policymaking on health issues has evolved since the early 2000s. Since then, there have been significant changes in society including increased aging of the population and the emergence of technology. However, the evolution of policymaking and current approaches to policymaking cross-cutting in those areas are not well documented. The purpose of this dissertation is to explore the factors that influence the development and implementation of a framework for policymaking specific to the topic of older adults’ self-management of disease and disabilities using information and communication technologies (ICT). I conducted one large study with three phases, using Ontario as a case study, to document the history and portray current approaches to policymaking in this area, and finally, to develop and validate a conceptual framework for policymaking. Grounded in Walt and Gilson’s model for policy analysis, we performed the following: Phase 1, which is presented in the first manuscript entitled ‘Evolution of public health policy on healthcare self-management: the case of Ontario, Canada’, used archival research methods combining document review and evaluation to identify specific factors that have influenced the development of healthcare self-management policies over time in Ontario. Seventy-two documents on self-management of health were retrieved, analyzed, and evaluated using Walt and Gilson’s model for policy analysis. Findings suggested that self-management of health was introduced into policies in the early 2000s with a focus on diabetes and chronic conditions. Very few policies had a specific focus on older adults, and technology was introduced as a tool to support self-management in the context of healthcare delivery and enhancing healthcare infrastructure. Additionally, the factors that have influenced the evolution of policies over time include pressures on the healthcare system, hybrid top-down and bottom-up policymaking, and the political context. Phase 2, which is presented in the second manuscript entitled ‘Policymaker perspectives on self-management of disease and disabilities using information and communication technologies’ used a qualitative approach to identify the current environment for policymaking on the topic older adults’ self-management of disease and disability using ICTs. Ten policymakers from four different ministries in the Government of Ontario participated in semi-structured interviews. The analysis revealed that policies, in the form of programs, services, legislation and regulations, are the result of collaboration and dialogue between different actors and via a set of complex government processes. In addition, policy actions come from a plethora of sectors which all get influenced by predictable and unpredictable external pressures. The environment for policymaking was found to be mostly reactive to external pressures, while organized within a set of complex processes and collaborations. Phase 3, which is presented in the manuscript entitled ‘Validation of a framework for policymaking on self-management of health by older adults using technologies’ used a quantitative approach to validate a provisional framework for policymaking. Nine participants answered the survey questions, and some offered unsolicited insights. The results revealed that the provisional framework adequately captured the areas that should compose a framework for policymaking for older adults’ self-management of disease and disability using ICTs in Ontario. Participants noted the need to further explore and define certain concepts of the provisional framework, and that other relevant concepts should be added to the framework. The study proposes a refined framework which offers an opportunity for policymakers to advance the policy agenda for older adults’ self-management of disease and disability using ICTs. Policymakers working in the realm of older adults’ self-management of disease and disability are faced with a rapidly evolving and changing context where technologies are becoming omnipresent. With policies often lagging the consideration and inclusion of technology, a framework that supports a coordinated and holistic approaches to policymaking can enhance proactivity and cohesive actions from governments to consider their application. This can lead to better health outcomes for older adults living in this innovative and everchanging ecosystem.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,252
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,868

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0160,005
Communication savante0,0060,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,055
Tête enseignante GPT0,356
Écart entre enseignants0,301 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Même sujetResearch on Leishmaniasis StudiesTravaux en français237 207