An appreciative inquiry towards school-based mindfulness in the Comox Valley School District
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Wellness tools that have proven to promote school-based mental health (SBMH) exist in schools, yet students continue to report a decline in mental health. Evidence illustrating how educators’ professional experiences influence students’ access to mental health resources is needed to help understand how to advance the promotion of student educational experiences. This study utilized the Inner Explorer mindfulness program as a wellness tool example that promotes SBMH. Comox Valley School District was chosen as this research’s case study considering their implementation of the Inner Explorer program as a district-wide student resource. This study applied qualitative case study as its methodology and data was collected through written and spoken interviews with six focal primary and secondary school educators from the district. The theoretical framework, Appreciative Inquiry, helped make meaning of the thematic findings that were analyzed. Insights about educators’ experiences of delivering Inner Explorer and their perceptions of the quality of student mental health because of the program were collected. Results discovered that SBMH programs that are financially accessible, user-friendly, contextually compatible for schools, and industry and student-endorsed were strengths that made these programs approachable to educators to adopt into their practices. Advancing and sustaining industry potentials and strengths in SBMH promotional efforts are ideal to support students develop their mental health quality, emotional literacy, and resiliency as self-sustainable and lifelong competencies. Embracing the Whole Child approach, supporting educator wellness, and providing educators with the knowledge to optimize the delivery of Inner Explorer was needed. Considering education’s critical ability to foster positive SBMH, this study’s findings were significant as they informed about the evolution of the Canadian education system and civic development, as well as the overarching progression of student mental health promotion. This research study was awarded the British Columbia Graduate Scholarship.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».