MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6926672685 · doi:10.25446/oxford.25920499

The story of Kathy and Charlie: how the Second World War changed the lives of two disabled people

2024· other· en· W6926672685 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen MIND · 2024
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueEnzyme Structure and Function
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBrotherCousinPoliomyelitisWorld War IIPorchAuntWheelchairFirst world war

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Charlie Bradford was born in Edmonton, North London in 1906; the second youngest of six children, and he contracted polio when he was three. The disease paralysed both his legs and his left arm and he had a severe curvature of the spine. He was less than five feet tall. He walked with crutches, leg irons and had to wear a leather and steel spinal corset that weighed nearly twenty pounds.When he left school at fourteen he was of course unemployable, so at various times in the 1920s and 1930s he peddled sweets from a hand-propelled wheelchair outside the local grammar school, made sandwiches that he sold to the men building the new A10 road, and bought second-hand wheelchairs and reconditioned them to sell on to others.Kathleen Lines was born in Wandsworth, South-West London in 1912. She was the eldest of six children; her youngest brother was only eight years younger than her. She caught the polio virus when she was ten months old, and it left her disabled in both legs. She was a talented needlewoman; she too left school at fourteen and worked as tailoress until 1945.At the start of World War II Charlie was living with his brother Jack and his family in Chiswick Road, Edmonton. My cousin Kath (born in 1930) recalled: "We had an outside Anderson shelter at the bottom of the garden. When there was an air-raid, no matter what time of day or night, Jack used to put Charlie on his back and take him to the shelter."After a few months of war, adults with disabilities were evacuated from London. Both Charlie and Kathy were sent to a 'cripple camp' at Dovercourt, Essex. That is where they met and fell in love. But neither Kathy nor Charlie stayed at Dovercourt for more than a few weeks. They found the atmosphere patronising and condescending. They were being treated as if they had learning disabilities as well as physical disabilities. They weren't used to that. Not only that, but Charlie had had a letter from the Ministry of Labour. He had been conscripted into the labour force to work in a munitions factory. For the first time in his life, society wanted him and needed him to play a part. He made bomber parts for the next five years. When she left Dovercourt, Kathy went to work as a seamstress at Hurst Lea, a residential school for disabled boys in Sevenoaks, Kent. She lived in, and made and repaired clothes for the boys.Kathy and Charlie married in Wandsworth in 1945 and lived in Edmonton for the rest of their lives. I am their only child; I was born in 1948. For them and many other people with disabilities, the war gave them opportunities that they could only have dreamed of. The welfare state, itself a product of the war years, provided them with affordable and accessible social housing and comprehensive medical care. Because of the Disabled Persons (Employment) Act of 1944, Charlie enjoyed positive discrimination in the workplace. On a personal level, had there been no war, they would never have met.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,122
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,243

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0550,024
Communication savante0,0130,013
Science ouverte0,0030,021
Intégrité de la recherche0,0110,045
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen MINDMême sujetEnzyme Structure and FunctionTravaux en français237 207