More stakeholders with fewer issues instead of fewer issues with more stakeholders
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
IntroductionThere is no provincial platform in Ontario to connect persons who are living with persistent symptoms of concussion. Approximately 157,000 Ontarians are diagnosed with a concussion each year and roughly 15 to 20% (23,550 u2013 31,440) go on to live with persistent symptoms which negatively affects their quality of life and places a significant burden on the healthcare system. By connecting existing stakeholders (caregivers, persons with lived experience and their family members) to a provincial platform, all regions within Ontario can be represented allowing common issues to be identified and prioritized for people experiencing persistent symptoms. This will help patients receive the right care, at the right time, from the right providers. This approach is based on the Ontario Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Alliance which represents approximately the same number of stakeholders in Ontario (32,000) and has been effective in sustaining government relations and funding. MethodsThe Provincial Advisory Network has been created to not only unify the voice of persons with lived experience but to allow for a more coordinated and systematic approach when organising collective political strategy toward government relations. The Government of Ontario has divided the province (over 14 million people) into 14 health regions and the Provincial Advisory Network has established coordinators within each region to ensure equal representation of stakeholders. The Provincial Advisory Network is capitalizing on the brain injury association networks to help formulate strategies and engage people from all ages and all types of concussion incidences (falls, sports, motor vehicle collisions etc.). The Ontario SCI Alliance is a key consultant in this methodology. Results The feedback which is retrieved in the form of surveys, questionnaires, focus groups, telecommunication and committee meetings from each of the 14 regions is continually analyzed to determine if it has local or provincial implications and whether it needs to be consulted with the healthcare sector, social services sector and/or different levels of government. The network is also used to disseminate materials on emerging trends in policies, benefits and issues relating to concussion in addition to helping regions learn from one another on how to better approach system challenges. The Provincial Advisory Network currently has over 300 stakeholders and is projected to grow to 4000-5000 stakeholders in three years time. Discussion The Provincial Advisory Network supports the development of an articulated provincial strategy to amplify the voice of the community of people living with persistent symptoms of concussion. This provincial platform is helping identify the most important issues to address and acts a two-way communication channel between the healthcare system and community. This platform will serve as a foundation to address the full spectrum of traumatic brain injury.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».