MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6929877924 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10245529

Geographies Of Creativity

2023· report· en· W6929877924 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typereport
Langueen
DomaineMaterials Science
ThématiqueLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCreative industriesCreativityCreative cityThe artsCreative CitiesCreative economyCreative class

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Recent years have seen growing and coordinated interest from industry, policymakers, funders and education institutions in harnessing the potential benefits that clustering brings for growth in the UK's creative industries. By clustering, we mean the tendency of creative businesses and workers to collaborate and compete with each other in the same places. Major examples of this include the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) and UK Research and Innovation's UKRI) Creative Industries Clusters Programme, in which universities play key roles as anchor institutions within regional innovation systems, the UK government's Department for Culture, Media and Sport's (DCMS) and Creative Industries Council's Creative Industries Sector Vision, and other national creative industries strategies such as the 10x Economy vision for Northern Ireland. UK policymakers and researchers have also recently sought to investigate clusters at a wider range of geographic levels than just cities and to assess their potential for driving regional creative industries growth. Mapping studies by Nesta (Mateos-Garcia and Bakhshi, 2016 and Klinger et. al., 2018) and more recently DCMS (2022) identify creative clusters at the broad level of commuting zones. Creative PEC has shown the important role that microclusters play in the UK's creative industries, while interventions such as the Arts Council England's Cultural Development Fund have supported local cultural and creative initiatives at a neighbourhood or street level. The Local Government Association has stressed the contribution that local authorities can make to creative industries development. A growing number of local enterprise partnerships count the creative industries among their sectoral priorities. At a macro level, cities and devolved regions and nations, together with other stakeholders, are exploring whether they can increase the collective strength of their creative industries ecosystems by joining up in key areas like access to finance and skills, inspired by the experience of 'innovation corridors' in the US and Canada. The emphasis on creative clustering at different levels of geographical resolution is timely: the UK's devolutionary turn and the renewed commitment by the UK Government to 'levelling up' the economy opens up new opportunities for policy intervention and collaborative action. This first State of the Nations report from Creative PEC outlines the UK's creative industries geographies. It is the first report to explore three levels of the UK's creative industries geographies in one place: clusters, microclusters and corridors. It provides an up-to-date economic assessment of the UK's clusters and microclusters, including the impact of Covid-19, by building on the recent work commissioned by DCMS, previous reports published by Creative PEC and the earlier studies from Nesta. In addition, it presents preliminary findings from an exploratory analysis to identify creative clusters in the UK where there may be potential for developing 'creative corridors'. Those findings include a deep dive on the North of England. Our main findings are as follows: • Notwithstanding the challenges of the Covid-19 pandemic, the creative industries have grown in many parts of the UK, but significant national and regional inequalities remain. • Creative clusters grew faster than other parts of the UK before the Covid-19 pandemic, but this was not the case on average during it. However, the 55 creative clusters identified by DCMS (2022) continue to make an outsized contribution to the UK's creative industries. • Creative microclusters are the growth hotspots in the UK's creative industries, and many of these are found outside the group of creative clusters. However, microclusters outside clusters have been hit harder by the pandemic. • Based on experimental geospatial analysis, we point to broad geographic areas in the UK's nations and regions which could be further explored for their potential to become creative corridors.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,887
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,992

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0260,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,137
Tête enseignante GPT0,315
Écart entre enseignants0,178 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesTravaux en français237 207