MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6930065093 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10406211

Scipopus (Phaeopterina) Frey 1927

2023· article· en· W6930065093 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiquePlanarian Biology and Electrostimulation
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Guelph
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSubgenusParaphylyMonophylyGenusCharacter (mathematics)Thorax (insect anatomy)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Subgenus Phaeopterina Frey, 1927 Phaeopterina Frey, 1927: 73 (type species: Phaeopterina heteropus Frey, 1927). Pseudeurybata Hennig, 1935: 28 (type species: Pseudeurybata stigmatica Hennig, 1935). Syn. nov. Scipopus (Phaeopterina) – Hennig 1934: 321 (key). — Steyskal 1968: 48.15. — Jackson et al. 2015: 415. — Marshall 2010: 810 (key). Scipopus (Phaeopterinus) – Aczel 1949: 344 (catalog). Phaeopterina – Marshall 2016: 254 (listed). Remarks Phaeopterina was originally diagnosed as being similar to Scipopus in most characteristics other than the absence of postocellar setae, but only a quarter of the species in the subgenus as now defined lack postocellar setae. We here circumscribe the subgenus based on molecular data and re-diagnose the newly defined subgenus using the combination of characters below. Molecular data show the type species of Phaeopterina and Pseudeurybata in monophyletic sister clades, but we were unable to find morphological characters by which to diagnose the clades. Since there are no practical morphological means of diagnosing Pseudeurybata from Phaeopterina, the new definition of S. (Phaeopterina) includes Pseudeurybata as a junior synonym, maintaining the monophyly of the subgenus while making it more easily diagnosable. Pseudeurybata was previously diagnosed by the tall and strongly deflexed clypeus, but the group of species with this character is shown to be paraphyletic in our molecular analysis, which places Pseudeurybata zeta within S. (Phaeopterina). Diagnosis Scipopus (Phaeopterina) (including Pseudeurybata) is recognizable by the combination of an entirely or mostly dull orbital plate, a developed pair of apical scutellar setae, an elongate thorax (length/height≥ 0.97) and postpronotal lobe (length/height ≥ 3), and sometimes a smooth or absent common spermathecal duct (rugose in Caribbean species). Scipopus (Ph.) fraudator sp. nov., placed in S. (Phaeopterina) mainly on the basis of molecular data (Fig. 2), is the only species of S. (Phaeopterina) to have shiny, clearly delineated orbital plates, making it superficially similar to species of S. (Parascipopus). It differs from S. (Parascipopus) in having the single and paired spermathecal ducts arising independently from the bursa and is further distinguished from similar species of S. (Parascipopus) by characters given in the key. Most S. (Phaeopterina) also have a shiny epicephalon, but the two Caribbean species have a dull epicephalon (as in some species of Scipopus s. str.). Description LENGTH. 9–17 mm. HEAD. Palpus orange to black, wide or narrow, nearly parallel-sided, rounded and tapered apically, setulose. Antenna and parafacial orange (brown in S. (Ph.) brunneus sp. nov.). Clypeus orange, brown or black, short or tall (length 1.4–2.7 × height), white microtrichose on entire surface or bare. Frontal vitta dull, orange, microtrichose (brown posteriorly in S. (Ph.) fraudator sp. nov.). Orbital plate dull, orange, microtrichose (shiny and bare in S. (Ph.) fraudator, partially shiny and bare in S. (Ph.) brunneus). Epicephalon orange, brown or black, wide or narrow, shiny and clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta or dull, orange, microtrichose, and not clearly delineated from upper frontal vitta. Paracephalon orange to black. Head with inner vertical, outer vertical and 1–2 lower fronto-orbital setae; upper fronto-orbital absent in S. (Ph.) gorgonae and sometimes S. (Ph.) turgidus sp. nov., and postocellar seta absent in a quarter of species. THORAX. Scutum orange, dark brown or black, often with a wide, silvery blue median sheen (Fig. 50A) (sometimes only visible at certain angles) and spots or patches of pale microtrichosity (Fig. 47B). Mesothorax tapered anteriorly. Thorax elongate (length/height>0.97). Cervical sclerite often relatively flat or slightly convex, sometimes swollen in females. Postpronotal lobe orange, brown or black, elongate (length 3.0–4.0 × height), bare or setulose. Notopleuron uniformly orange, brown or black, or with varying patterns of silvery or pale brown microtrichia. Pleuron dark brown or black, entirely white microtrichose (at most small bare spot on anteroventral margin of anepisternum) (Fig. 47A). Legs orange, dark brown or black, femora sometimes yellow or pale brown basally or with orange or black bands. Fore and hind tarsomere 1 partially or entirely white or entirely brown dorsally, often with ventral golden fringe. Female abdominal pleuron pale yellow or grey, microtrichose, usually with dark shading on P1 and dorsal half of some or all of P2–6; male abdominal pleuron orange or pale grey, microtrichose, usually with dark shading on P1, dorsal half or entirety of pleural sac, and some or all of P3–P6. WING. Patterning variable, ranging from uniformly brown infuscate, clear, infuscate with three subapical hyaline spots (Fig. 61D), with subapical hyaline band (Fig. 58F) or hyaline with apical infuscation (Fig. 68). ABDOMEN (J+ ♀). Tergites orange, dark brown or black. T1 with fine white, yellow and/or black setae, remainder of abdomen with medium length or short black or orange setulae. FEMALE ABDOMEN. T1+2 1.1–2.5 × length of T3. Anterior margin of T2 sometimes swollen, posterior margin of T2 1.4–2.1 × the width of T1. Oviscape variable in dimension but tapered distally and sparsely covered in short or medium length pale or black setulae and white microtrichia basally. Paired and single spermathecal duct arising independently from bursa copulatrix in most species (Fig. 47E), single duct arising from common duct in Caribbean species (Fig. 58E), and single duct arising from very short, smooth common duct in a few species (S. (Ph.) brunneus sp. nov., S. (Ph.) musculosus sp. nov., S. (Ph.) sexguttatus) (Fig. 61C). Paired spermathecal duct smooth, usually narrow and long, often with a swollen distal bulb (Fig. 70C). Paired spermathecal stems usually bare, sometimes with bumps or spiked projections. Paired spermathecae usually elongate and approximately ovoid or sac-like. Single spermathecal duct smooth and usually narrow, ending in one or two small ovoid or finger-like spermathecae. MALE ABDOMEN. T1+2 2.0–2.5× length of T3. Genital fork arms with or without inner basal processes, length and shape of arms and processes variable. Epandrium stout (length ≈ height) to elongate (length>2.5 × height). Basiphallus small and usually crescent-shaped or frame-like when viewed ventrally (Fig. 71B). Basal distiphallus usually long and wide (≈ length of epandrium), ending in phallic bulb. Phallic bulb usually large and ovoid, with multiple chambers. Distal distiphallus absent (Fig 47D), short and wide (Fig. 54D), or long and narrow (Fig. 58D). Phallapodeme usually broad and expanded apically (Fig. 60D). Anterior margin of hypandrium often with broad, fan-like extensions (Fig. 60D), otherwise slender. Ejaculatory apodeme varying in size, usually with a fan-like apodeme attached to a bulbous sperm pump.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,467
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetPlanarian Biology and ElectrostimulationTravaux en français237 207