MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6930087273 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10169292

Dilophus erythraeus Bezzi 1905

2023· article· en· W6930087273 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTanzaniaDemocracyQuarter (Canadian coin)Type (biology)Work (physics)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dilophus erythraeus Bezzi, 1905 (figs. 15–16, 85–92) Type locality: ERITREA, Adi Keyh (2500m). Type in Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Milan (not studied) Previous records: Yemen (Hardy 1951a), Sudan (Hardy 1951a), Eritrea (Bezzi 1905), Kenya (Hardy 1948, Hardy 1951a), Tanzania (Hardy 1951a, Hardy 1960a), Uganda (Hardy 1948, Hardy 1951a), Malawi (Hardy 1951a), Democratic republic of Congo (Hardy 1950, Hardy 1951a, Hardy 1952a, Hardy 1952b), Rwanda (Hardy 1950, Hardy 1955), Burundi (Hardy 1952c), Zimbabwe (Hardy 1951a), Republic of South Africa (Hardy 1951a).. Material: YEMEN, Kaulat-el-Asabeir, N.E, of Haz, 16 mi. N.W. of San’a, 2870m, 4.ii. 1938, 1 ♁ (NHMUK), Usafira, 1 mile N. of Ta’izz, 1370m, 18.vii.1937, 1 ♀ (NHMUK), San’a, 2400m, 26.ii. 1938 (NHMUK). ETHIOPIA, Ahmar Mts., Kulubi, 10. xi. 2007, 1 ♁ (TAU), Ahmar Mts., Kersa, 9. xi. 2007, 1 ♀ (TAU), Gedamba, 25 km Addis Ababa, 2200m, 24. iv. 2013, 1 ♁ (TAU), Shewa, Wendo Genet, 2100m, 29. i. 2000, 1 ♁ (TAU), Shewa, Wendo Genet, 1900m, 28. i. 2000, 1 ♁ (TAU), Welo, Gondi 60 km SW Lalibela, 2485m, 9. x. 2005, 1 ♁ (TAU). KENYA, Kericho, 9. x. 1998, 1 ♁ (TAU), Kericho, 25. viii. 2003, 2 ♁♁ 3 ♀♀ (TAU), Kabarnet, 11.–12. x. 1998, 1 ♁ 1 ♀ (TAU), Bungoma, 10. x. 1998, 1 ♁ (TAU), Taita Hills, Mwatata-Wundanyi Rd 1000–1400m, 18. ix. 2005, 1 ♁ (TAU), Taita Hills, Mwanda 1800m, 19. ix. 2005, 1 ♀ (TAU), Taita Hills, Vuria Peak 2200m, 19. ix. 2005, 1 ♁ (TAU), Naivasha, Magura 2085m, 6. ii. 2011, 1 ♁ 3 ♀♀ (TAU), Naivasha, 14.–17. i. 1972, 1 ♀ (TAU), Nairobi, Karura Forest, 16. x. 2007, 1 ♁ (TAU), Nairobi, Muthaiga North, 1650m, 1. iv. 2013, 3 ♁♁ 3 ♀♀ (TAU), Nairobi, Muthaiga North, 1650m, 8. iv. 2013, 1 ♁ 4 ♀♀ (TAU), Nairobi, vii. 1969, C.F. Dewhurst leg., 18♁♁ (NHMUK), Nairobi, 9.18. vii.1970, A.E. Stubbs leg, 1 ♁ (NHMUK), Khalengwe, nr. Endebess, 1834m, 27. vii. 2013, 3 ♁♁ 1 ♀ (TAU), Equator. 30.x. 1983, 4 ♁♁ 1 ♀ (TAU), 10 km E. Kitale, 2. xi. 1983, 1 ♁ (TAU). Mt. Elgon, heath zone 3200– 3500m, ii. 1935, F.W.Edwards leg, 1♁ 2♀♀ (NHMUK), Molo, N. of Nakuru, 21.vii.1970, A.E. Stubbs leg., 1 ♁ (NHMUK), Kabete, vii.1916, R.H. Deakin leg., 1 ♀ (NHMUK), Nyeri, iii–iv.1948, M. Steele leg., 2♀♀ (NHMUK), Nanyuki (S.), v.1948, van Someren leg., 1 ♀ (NHMUK), « Kenya Colony », 13.i.1931, R.H. LePelley leg., 1♁ 5♀♀ (NHMUK). UGANDA, Kisoro 2000m, 26. xii. 1995, 1 ♁ (TAU), Mt. Muhavura 2350m, 29.xii.1995, 1 ♀ (TAU). TANZANIA, Njombe 10 km SE, 2000m, 27.–28.viii.1996, 1 ♀ (TAU), Njombe, 1830–1980m, 24.ii.1957, 1 ♀, 20.ix.1957, 2♀♀ (NHMUK), W. Usambara, Lushoto, 17.–18. viii. 2003, 1 ♁ 2 ♀♀ (TAU), Usambara Mts, nr. Lushoto, 1300m, 10.–15.ix.1992, 2 ♁♁ (TAU), Usambara Mts., Rt B 124, 1500m, 9.ix.1992, 1 ♀ (TAU), New Langenburg, vi.1919, H.S. Stannus leg., 2 ♀♀ (NHMUK). BURUNDI, Kayanza, Kibira NP, Rwegura 2100m, 28– 30.i. 2011, 2 ♁♁ (TAU). MALAWI, Ntchisi Lodge, 1370m, 23. xii. 2009, 1 ♁ (TAU), Zomba Plateau, South Water Board Cottage, 1471m, 5. i. 2010, 1 ♀ (TAU), Limbe, ix. 1916, R.C. Wood leg., 1 ♁ 1 ♀ (NHMUK). ZIMBABWE: Mashonaland, Mt. Chirinda, 2680m, 12.vi.1911, C.F.M. Swynnerton leg., 102 ♁♁ 25 ♀♀ (NHMUK). REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA, Inn on Robber’s Pass 1400m, 27. xii. 1994, 1 ♁ (TAU), Johannesburg, Parktown North, i.–ii.1930, 1 ♀ (NHMUK). NAMIBIA, Grootfontein, Dakota 424, 13.–23. xii. 1993 (NNM). ANGOLA: Chianga, 21.–24.iii. 1972, 2 ♁♁ 1 ♀ (NHMUK). CAMEROON, Mezam, Sincoa vill. 6 ♁♁ (NMSA). MNHN: material from Kenya and Cameroon. Previously recorded from present Democratic Republic of Congo, Eritrea, Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Yemen and Zimbabwe (Hardy 1951). Diagnosis: A smallish (2.3–3.9 mm), compact species, body with very inconspicuous pile, appearing nearly naked. The species is most readily recognised by the costa ending immediately after the apex of R 4+5, in all other afrotropical species it extends to at least one-third the distance between apices of R 4+5 and M 1. Male (fig. 15): Total length 2.29–3.88 mm (N=16). Head (fig. 86): Length 0.57–0.89 mm (N=15), width 0.75–0.98 mm (N=11). Complex eye nearly naked, intraocular setae about as long as one facet diameter, ocellar tubercle small, not prominent. Rostrum extending about one fourth diameter of lower complex eye. Occiput with very short, pale setae. Antenna cylindrical, flagellum 0.21–0.28 mm long (N=14), 0.06–0.09 mm wide (N=15), 7-segmented. Palp short. Thorax: Length 0.92–1.38 mm, width 0.58–0.92 mm (N=16). Black, shiny, almost entirely without setae. Pronotal spine row with 8 sharp, erect spines. Mesonotal spine row with 12 short spines forming a semi-circle. Dorsocentral setae very short and inconspicuous. Haltere brownish-yellow. Legs: Reddish-brown. Fore tibia (fig. 87) with 4 mesal spines in transverse (scarcely oblique) row, apically with circlet of 8 spines. Mid tibia with circlet of spine-like setae apically. Hind tibia sligthtly clavate, all tarsi slender. Measurements (N=16 unless otherwise stated): fore femur 0.49–0.68 mm long, 0.17–0.23 mm wide, fore tibia 0.55– 0.72 mm long, 0.08–0.12 mm wide, first fore tarsomere 0.34–0.47 mm long (N=13), mid femur 0.51–0.75 mm long (N=15), mid tibia 0.54–0.75 mm long, hind femur 0.79–1.11 mm long (N=15), 0.12–0.19 mm wide (N=15), hind tibia 0.85–1.19 mm long (N=15), 0.08–0.13 mm wide (N=14), first hind tarsomere 0.32–0.47 mm long (N=14). Wing (fig. 85): Length 2.55–3.51 mm, width 0.87–1.19 mm, length/width = 2.46–3.28 (N=14), hyaline. Pterostigma invisible. R-veins and base of M yellowish, posterior veins colourless. Costa with sparse, fine setulae, terminates at apex of R 4+5. Humeral vein absent, subcosta nearly invisible. Basal Rs short, about 0.2* R-M. R 4+5 almost straight. Fork of M asymmetrical. M-CuA joins M a little before furcation. Fork of CuA moderately wide (less so than in previous species). Rather symmetrical since CuA 2 is distinctly curved apicad. No kink in CuA 1 at M-CuA, CuA 2 apically straight. CuP indistinctive, A 1 basally fairly distinctive. Fringe very inconspicuous. Abdomen: black, laterally with erect setae, otherwise virtually bare. Teminalia: Hypopygium (figs. 88–89) width 0.28–0.49 mm (N=14), trapezoidal and slightly rounded in outline. Gonostylus straight, with a distinctive ́head» and a slightly pointed tip. Epandrium wide, trapezoidal, apically gently concave, sparsely clad with fine setae.Ventral indentation of gonocoxosternite very shallow, about one-eighth of segment length. Female (fig. 16): Total length 3.2–3.8 mm (N=4). Head (fig. 91): Length 0.75–0.83 mm, width 0.52–0.58 mm (N=4), dark brown, shiny. Head length approximately twice length of complex eye in lateral view. Ocellar tubercle rather small and low. Occiput with a few short, strong setae, frons with some backward-pointing setae. Antenna cylindrical, flagellum 0.30–0.34 mm long, 0.08–0.09 mm wide (N=4), 8-segmented. Head extends about one half eye diameter anterior to eye. Palp short, last segment conical. Underside with a few small, white setae. Thorax: Length 1.36–1.66 mm, width 0.70–0.91 mm (N=4). Yellowish-red with brownish-black dorsal stripe. Pleurae mostly reddish-brown, meron bicoloured: dorsally yellowish-red, ventrally brown. Almost entirely naked. Pronotal spine row with 9–12 erect, sharp spines, mesontal spine row with 11–12 short spines placed on a raised ridge. Haltere yellowish-brown. Legs: Fore coxa reddish-yellow, mid- and hind coxae reddish-brown. Femorae reddish-yellow, apical fourth brown. Tibiae and tarsi blackish-brown. Fore tibia (fig. 92) mesally with 4 sharp spines on oblique row, apically with circlet of 8 strong spines. Mid tibia anterioventrally with row of strong, spinelike setae. All tarsi slender. Measurements (N=4 unless otherwise stated): fore femur 0.62–0.70 mm long, 0.26–0.30 mm wide, fore tibia 0.72– 0.75 mm long, 0.11–0.12 mm wide, first fore tarsomere 0.43–0.49 mm long (N=3), mid femur 0.68–0.79 mm long, mid tibia 0.70–0.79 mm long, hind femur 0.98–1.15 mm long, 0.20–0.21 mm wide, hind tibia 1.08–1.26 mm long, 0.13 mm wide, first hind tarsomere 0.45–0.57 mm long. Wing (fig. 90): Length 3.62–4.10 mm, width 1.17–1.42 mm, length/width = 2.78–3.09. Colour and venation as in male. Abdomen: entirely blackish-brown. Cerci rounded. Distribution and ecology:This is the most widely distributed of the afrotropical Dilophus and ranges from Yemen south to the northern part of the Republic of South Africa, to the west at least to Cameroon.The species has been recorded at altitudes between 1000–3500m and appears to be quite eurytopical, though the majority of the localities are montane. The species has been collected from cultivated fields and from the heath zone of mountains. Flight period: the available specimens have been collected between late July and April, suggesting that adults can be found almost throughout the year, not surprisingly for a species so widespread in tropical areas (Table 2).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,044

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,004

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,058
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2023
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→Travaux en français237 207→