MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6930337349 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13742587

Triepeolus eumeniformis Onuferko & Rightmyer, 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6930337349 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueBerry genetics and cultivation research
Établissements canadiensCanadian Museum of Nature
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTransverse planeSetaBasal (medicine)Process (computing)Apex (geometry)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Triepeolus eumeniformis sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 639463C4-48D5-4B50-BBF9-1A2A9BF67ED4 Figs 6D, 10D, 11C–D, 12C, 16 Proposed common name Potter-wasp triepeolus. Diagnosis The following morphological features in combination tell T. eumeniformis sp. nov. apart from all other Triepeolus in the simplex species group: the mesoscutum has well-defined paramedian bands (Fig. 16B), the T1 discal patch is semicircular (Fig. 11C) or trapezoidal (Figs 11D, 16B), the T1 basal band (if present) is more widely interrupted medially than the apical transverse band (Figs 11C–D, 16B), and T3–T4 and usually also T2 have complete apical transverse bands of yellow tomentum that are about as broad as the bands on T1 and do not have basomedially convergent anterolateral extensions (Figs 10D, 11C–D, 16A–C). Triepeolus eumeniformis most closely resembles specimens of T. alvarengai that have an apical transverse band on T1 and T. paucipunctatus sp. nov., but in T. alvarengai the T1 apical transverse band (if present) is not more narrowly interrupted medially than the basal band and in T. paucipunctatus the T2 apical transverse band has a pair of well-defined basomedially convergent anterolateral extensions and the mesopleura are more sparsely punctate (some i>4d as opposed to ≤ 3d) and have sparse, pale-yellow, erect/suberect, simple setae (reaching about ½ MOD in length) in addition to the usual appressed, branched setae. Additionally, T. eumeniformis can easily be separated from T. alvarengai by geography; the former is known only from Mexico and Central America whereas the latter is known only from Brazil. Males of T. eumeniformis also closely resemble those of T. rufoclypeus (Fox, 1891) (outside of the simplex species group), but in T. rufoclypeus S3 has an apical/subapical fringe of dense, long (> 1 MOD), curved, pale setae (as opposed to only short, straight setae; Fig. 10D). This species is also very similar in overall appearance to specimens of Epeolus flavofasciatus Smith, 1879 (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Nomadinae) in which the axillae and mesoscutellum are black, but both sexes of T. eumeniformis can easily be told apart from any similar-looking Epeolus Latreille, 1802 by their simple mandibles; in E. flavofasciatus and most other Epeolus spp., the mandibles each have a distinct preapical tooth. Etymology The specific epithet is derived from Eumenes Latreille, 1802, the type genus of the subfamily Eumeninae (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), and was inspired by this species’ resemblance to various kinds of potter wasps. The Latin adjectival suffix ‘-formis’ means ‘having the form of’. Material examined Primary type material HONDURAS • ♀, holotype; Cortés, Estación Experimental Café (near Peñas Blancas rainforest); 15 Aug. 1992; C. Porter and L. Stange leg.; FSCA. Secondary type material HONDURAS • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as for holotype; FSCA M.G.R. Database No. 1321. MEXICO – Chiapas • 1 ♀, paratype; 18 km S of La Trinitaria (small road NW of Hwy 190); 5 Dec. 1976; D.E. and J.A. Breedlove leg.; CAS • 1 ♀, paratype; Ei. Las Golondrinas (Acacoyagua); 15.4340° N, 92.6522° W; 29 Nov. 2004; M. Rincón, R. Ayala, and M. Guzmán leg.; ECOSUR ECO-TA-E-41202 • 1 ♀, paratype; Ei. Rosario Zacatonales (Acacoyagua); 8 Dec. 2004; M. Guzmán, M. Rincón, J. Esponda, C. Balboa, and J. Mérida leg.; ECOSUR ECO-TA-E-41813 • 1 ♂, allotype; same data as for preceding; 10 Nov. 2006; J. Mérida, M. Guzmán, M. Cigarroa, J. Toto, and C. Balboa leg.; ECOSUR ECO-TAE-50298 • 1 ♀, paratype; Ei. Rosario Zacatonales (Acacoyagua); 15.4455° N, 92.6455° W; 29 Nov. 2004; M. Rincón, R. Ayala, and M. Guzmán leg.; ECOSUR ECO-TA-E-41255 • 3 ♂♂, paratypes; same data as for preceding; 29 Nov. 2004; M. Rincón, R. Ayala, and M. Guzmán leg.; ECOSUR ECO-TA-E-41259, ECO-TA-E-41271, ECO-TA-E-41312 • 1 ♂, paratype; same data as for preceding; 8 Dec. 2004; M. Rincón, R. Ayala, and M. Guzmán leg.; ECOSUR ECO-TA-E-41944 • 1 ♀, paratype; Ei. Rosario Zacatonales (Acacoyagua); 15.4480° N, 92.6435° W; 30 Nov. 2004; M. Rincón, R. Ayala, and M. Guzmán leg.; ECOSUR ECO-TA-E-41611 • 1 ♂, paratype; same data as for preceding; 30 Nov. 2004; M. Rincón, R. Ayala, and M. Guzmán leg.; ECOSUR ECO-TA-E-41610 • 1 ♀, paratype; Ei. Unión los Olivos (Mapastepec); 8 Nov. 2006; J. Mérida, M. Guzmán, M. Cigarroa, J. Toto, and C. Balboa leg.; ECOSUR ECO-TAE-50103. – Estado de México • 1 ♀, paratype; Tepotzotlán; 12 Nov. 1983; O. Morales leg.; UNAM. – Jalisco • 1 ♀, paratype; Chamela; 24 Oct. 1986; “ A. Rodriguez P. ” leg.; UNAM. – Morelos • 1 ♂, paratype; Campamento YMCA, Tepoztlán; 21 Aug. 1958; H.F. Howden leg.; CNC 1801914. – Nayarit • 1 ♀, paratype; 8 mi N of Tepic; 25.vii.1954; M. Cazier, W. Gertsch, and Bradts leg.; AMNH. – Tamaulipas • 1 ♀, paratype; Cañón de Peregrina; 20 Oct. 1974; J.E. Gillaspy leg.; USNM. – Veracruz • 1 ♀, paratype; 5 mi NE of Tinajas; 18 Aug. 1963; F.D. Parker and L.A. Stange leg.; UCBME • 1 ♀, paratype; Fortín de las Flores; 17 Sep. 1954; F.X. Williams leg.; CAS. DNA barcoded material Unavailable. Description MEASUREMENTS OF HOLOTYPE. Body length 9.5 mm; ITW 1.9 mm; head length 2.3 mm; head width 3.3 mm; fore wing length 7.7 mm. Both sexes INTEGUMENT COLORATION. Dark brown to black except as follows. Mandible with basal half (except for extreme base) and labrum with lateral margin reddish orange. F1 to some extent, tegula, coxae to femora to some extent, and tibiae (excluding brown meso- and metatibial spurs) and tarsi predominantly to entirely orange. F2 with orange spot basally (entirely dark brown in some paratypes). Fore wing membrane dusky subhyaline throughout. Hind wing membrane dusky subhyaline to hyaline. PUBESCENCE. Face with tomentum densest around antennal socket. Tomentum slightly sparser on clypeus; upper paraocular and frontal areas and vertexal area mostly exposed. Pronotal collar with tomentum uniformly bright yellow. Mesoscutum with well-defined paramedian band of bright yellow tomentum, tapering slightly toward but not attaining anterior margin; pale tomentum otherwise mostly restricted to lateral and posterior margins. Mesopleuron with black, appressed, branched setae just anterior to hypoepimeral area and pale-yellow, appressed, branched setae elsewhere; densely setose only just below pronotal lobe and scrobal groove and along posterior margin above base of mesocoxa (upper half otherwise sparsely setose); ventrolateral half nearly bare, except along margins. Mesopleuron with sparse, pale-yellow, erect/suberect, simple setae (less than ½ MOD in length) in addition to usual appressed, branched setae. Metanotum with tomentum dark brown/gray submedially and pale yellow laterally and medially (pale yellow laterally and black medially in some paratypes). Propodeal triangle mostly glabrous, with (pale) setae restricted to small lateral patches. T1 with basal transverse band of pale-yellow tomentum widely interrupted medially and arched but distinguishable from lateral longitudinal band (continuous with (and indistinguishable from) lateral longitudinal band in allotype and multiple paratypes), apical transverse band of bright yellow tomentum separated into pair of rounded lobes medially, discal patch trapezoidal (semicircular in allotype and multiple paratypes). T2–T4 with complete apical transverse bands of bright yellow tomentum without anterolateral extensions (T2 band with pair of very short and small anterolateral extensions in some paratypes). S2–S3 with apical transverse bands of white tomentum. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Labrum coarsely and densely (most i <1d) rugose-punctate. Clypeus densely punctate (most i ≤ 1d) but interspaces well defined, shining; with many small punctures among larger ones. Vertexal area densely punctate (most i ≤1d). Mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, and axilla with punctures more or less equally dense (most i ≤1d); interspaces well defined, dull due to tessellate surface microsculpture. Mesopleuron with punctures in upper half denser (most i≤ 1d) than in ventrolateral half (i ≤3d); interspaces shining; punctures similar in size throughout. Discs of metasomal terga with punctures very fine, dense (i≈ 1d), and evenly distributed; interspaces somewhat dull due to tessellate surface microsculpture. STRUCTURE. Labral apex with pair of small denticles, each preceded by discrete longitudinal ridge. Pronotal collar rather short (medial length ~ ⅔ MOD). Mesoscutellum weakly bigibbous. Axilla not extending beyond midlength of mesoscutellum; tip visible but somewhat blunt, mesally unattached to mesoscutellum for less than ⅓ medial length of axilla; lateral margin relatively straight. Fore wing with three submarginal cells. Female Scape and pedicel extensively orange. T5 with reddish brown and concave apical margin and large patch of pale-yellow tomentum on each side lateral to pseudopygidial area. Pseudopygidial area with triangular region of posteriorly directed setae with three subregions (basal patch of dense, golden setae; darker subapical band of sparser, coppery setae; and apical row of dense, suberect, silvery setae) within larger trapezoidal space of posteromedially directed dark brown setae. Pygidial plate reddish brown in part and apically truncate. S4 with apical transverse band of white tomentum. S5 straight in lateral view, with apical fimbria of coppery bristle-like setae. Male Pedicel orange in part in some paratypes. T5–T6 with complete apical transverse bands of bright yellow tomentum. Pygidial plate with small orange spot subapically, relatively flat and apically rounded. S4–S5 each with apical/subapical fringe of dense, long (> 1 MOD), curved setae, those of S4 coppery to silvery, those of S5 coppery and contrasting with apical transverse bands of white tomentum of preceding sterna. Distribution Western Mexico to the Northern Triangle of Central America (Fig. 12C). Ecology Host records Unknown. Floral records The label of one examined voucher specimen indicates that this species has been collected from the following flowering plant specie

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,024

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,003
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetBerry genetics and cultivation researchTravaux en français237 207