MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6930389338 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13169541

Andinopanurgus chirosimpson Packer 2021, new species

2021· article· en· W6930389338 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Établissements canadiensYork University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaApex (geometry)HolotypeHookRake

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Andinopanurgus chirosimpson Packer, new species ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 602929D3-03C0-459E-9641-5350C04C653C (Figs. 1–8, 24) DIAGNOSIS: The new species, known only from the male, can be differentiated from all other bees except the second new species described below by the very unusual setal patern on S4 (Figs. 4–5), which involves setae that are branched into two unequal halves or three or four more equal thirds or quarters respectively. Each branch is somewhat digitiform and the whole structure can look like a human hand (minus the thumb) or rake while the three-branched hairs look somewhat like tridents. There are weak longitudinal raised lines on these branches (Fig. 5). While some related species, A. bachue (Gonzalez & Ruz), A. rangeli (Gonzalez & Ruz), and A. wayruronga (Gonzalez & Ruz), have short, broad setae apicomedially on S5, these species do not have unusual setae on S4 (they also differ in numerous other ways, but the details of the setation of S4 of the new species alone is sufficient to diagnose it). It can be differentiated from A. lynnae, described below, by the absence of the pale transverse clypeal marking that is present in A. lynnae and in details of the setation on S4 (compare Figs. 4–5 with Figs. 11–12). DESCRIPTION: ♂: Body length 6.05 mm, forewing length 4.3 mm, head width 1.55 mm, intertegular distance ≈ 0.9mm [thorax somewhat distorted by pin]. Coloration. Black, following parts dark red-brown: apex of mandible, base of labrum, legs, tegula, vein R and prestigma; apex of apical impressed areas of T 4– T 6, all of T 7, apical impressed areas of S1–S5; all of S6; following parts dark yellow brown: reflexed sides of terga and most remaining wing veins and stigma; F2–F11 dark brown ventrally, black-brown dorsally; wing membranes pale yellow-brown. Pubescence. Whitish with numerous short branches, sparse unless stated otherwise; longest less than 2.5 MOD on face, mesoscutum and scutellum and relatively dense on sides and ventral surface of mesosoma including procoxa, protrochanter, and metacoxa; shorter ≈1.5 MOD on genal area below, lateral surface of propodeum above; dense, somewhat anteriorly oriented and short ≈1 MOD on metanotum; metasomal terga with obscure hairs except T 6– T 7 with pale orange hairs ≈1.5 MOD; apex of T 7 with dense cream-colored plumose short ≈0.5 MOD hairs obscuring underlying integument; S1 and apicolateral portions of S2–S6 with branched hairs ≈1.5 MOD; S4 apicomedially with setae that are divided from near the base into two to four parallel, digitiform branches, setae up to ≈0.3 MOD wide, the four-branched ones are less than twice as long as the width of a seta; S5 with erect hairs broad at base ≤1 MOD. Hairs on vertex brown, <1.5 MOD. Surface sculpture. Microsculpture absent on clypeus; weak lateral of lateral ocelli, on discs of mesoscutum and scutellum, T 7 and S6; distinct, surface somewhat dull elsewhere except strong and surface dull on metanotum, metapostnotum and sides of mesosoma. Clypeal punctures large, elongate, i<d except almost impunctate apicomedially; supraclypeal area impunctate medially, rest of face and genal area punctures shallow but distinct i≤d, vertex less densely punctate i=0.5–3d; mesoscutum disc irregularly punctate i=1–6d, margins of mesoscutum more densely punctate i≤d, scutellum i=0.5–1.5d, metanotum densely punctate i<0.5d; metapostnotum with a few radiating weak striae among crowded small punctures; mesopleuron punctures shallow obscure, metapleuron longitudinally rugoso-striate, propodeum with dense small punctures i<0.5d; T 1 punctures distinct on anterior portion of disc i=1–2d, sparser posteriorly; T 2– T 4 punctures shallow obscure among microsculpture i>d, T 5– T 7 punctures increasingly distinct, variable in size, i>d except towards side of T 7 i<d. Structure. Head shorter than wide (59:78); labrum almost twice as wide as long (38:20), basal box surface concave, apically strongly ridged, sides divergent, apical margin convex; labial palpomere 1 almost as long as remaining 3 combined (25:28); clypeus 2.5× as wide as long 80:32; interantennal to antennocular distances (29:22); malar area linear; supraclypeal area slightly more protuberant than clypeus in profile; anterior tentorial pit at junction of outer subantennal and epistomal sulci; epistomal lobe absent, epistomal sulcus straight from junction with inner subantennal sulcus to close to lateral clypeal margin; compound eyes ≈1.5× as long as wide (78:50), much wider than genal area in lateral view (32); inner margin of compound eyes weakly concave, strongly convergent below, upper to minimum to lower interocular distances (60:39:44); inner and outer subantennal sutures outwardly concave, subantennal sclerite widest above midlength 1.5× antennal socket diameter (15:10); frontal line weakly raised except depressed just above bluntly rounded process above lower tangent of antennal sockets; facial fovea deep, oval 1.5× longer than wide (6:4); interocellar distance half ocellocular distance (18:36); vertex strongly convex in frontal view; flagellum longer than width of head (90:78); flagellum unmodified, not crenulate; F1 length and width subequal (13:14); F2 shorter than wide (10:14); F3 shorter than wide (13:15); remaining flagellomeres with length and width subequal except F11 almost twice as long as wide (28:15). Mesoscutum length and intertegular widths subequal (40:42), median line more than half length of mesoscutum, distinct, ending in small deep oval depression; parapsidal line ≈¾ as long as tegula (15:19); scutellum:metanotum:metapostnotum (29:18:25); legs unmodified, meso- and metatibial spurs weakly curved, ciliate; inner and outer rami of tarsal claws subequal in length; lengths of posterior margins of submarginal cells subequal (28:26); both recurrent veins entering second submarginal cell, first much further from first submarginal cross vein than second is from second submarginal crossvein (9:5); stigma ≈2.5× longer than maximum width (26:10); marginal cell ≈3.5× longer than maximum width (48:14), apex truncate. T 1 shorter than apical width (33:44); apical impressed areas distinct, on T 2 as long as MOD; T 2 lateral fovea weak, obscure; T 2– T 4 strongly transversely depressed anteriorly; T 7 apex weakly concave; S1–S5 unmodified, S6 apically narrowly and weakly concave medially; S7 apical lobes subparallel to each other, irregularly and weakly narrowing posteriorly, apex briefly deflected ventrally; S8 apical lobe parallel-sided, apex broadly rounded; gonocoxa swollen at base of gonostylus medially; gonostylus fused to gonocoxa, in profile narrowing from base to acute apex, dorsal surface weakly concave, ventral surface convex; penis valves dorsoventrally flatened, gradually narrowed to acute apex. ♀: Unknown. HOLOTYPE: ♂, ARGENTINA, Tucumán, Tafi de[l] Valle, sweep, 19.i.1996, M.J. Sharkey. The specimen is housed at the Packer Collection at York University (PCYU). ETYMOLOGY: The species name refers to unique hairs on S4 some of which are quadridigitate, like the hands of cartoon characters such as in the television series, “The Simpsons”. “Cheiro” being Ancient Greek for hand. COMMENTS: The town named as the type locality is slightly over 2000 m in altitude. This is lower than the altitudinal range for most species of the genus, although the two species of the guarnensis species group are known from similar, or even lower, elevations (Gonzalez et al., 2013). The setation of S4 seems unique among all bees, although those of the following new species are similar. Some Eucerini bear unusually thickly branched hairs, but these are on the legs, such as on the ventral surface of the mesotibia of Svastrides melanura (Spinola) (see Discussion, below).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,578
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0490,017

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,075
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchTravaux en français237 207