MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6930437339 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10949682

Data and Processing from "Carbon-centric dynamics of Earth's marine phytoplankton"

2024· dataset· en· W6930437339 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typedataset
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueSoil and Environmental Studies
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésArgoRaw dataSatelliteNetCDFData processingData fileFile formatTable (database)Documentation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Brief Summary: This documentation is for associated data and code for: A. Stoer, K. Fennel, Carbon-centric dynamics of Earth's marine phytoplankton. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2024). To cite this software and data, please use: A. Stoer, K. Fennel, Data and processing from "Carbon-centric dynamics of Earth's marine phytoplankton". Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10949682. Deposited 1 October 2024. List of folders and subfolders and what they contain: raw data: Contains raw data used in the analysis. This folder does not contain the satellite imagery, which will need to be downloaded from the NASA Ocean Color website (https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/). bgc-argo float data (subfolder): Includes Argo data from its original source or put into a similar Argo format global region data (subfolder): Includes data used to subset the Argo profiles into each 10deg lat region and basin. graff et al 2015 data (subfolder): Include the data digitized from Graff et al.'s Fig. 2. processed data: data processing by this study (Stoer and Fennel, 2024) processed bgc-argo data (subfolder): A binned processed file is present for each Argo float used in the analysis. Note these files include those describe in Table S1 (these are later processed in "3_stock_bloom_calc.py") processed satellite data (subfolder): includes a 10-deg latitude averaged for each satellite image processed (called "chl_sat_df_merged.csv"). This is later used to calculate a satellite chlorophyll-a climatology in "3_stock_bloom_calc.py". processed chla-irrad data (subfolder): includes the quality-controlled light diffuse attenuation data coupled with the chlorophyll-a fluorescence data to calculate slope factor corrections (the file is called "processed chla-irrad data.csv"). processed topography data (subfolder): includes smoothed topography data (file named "ETOPO_2022_v1_60s_N90W180_surface_mod.tiff"). software: 0_ftp_argo_data_download.py: This program downloads the Argo data from the Global Data Assembly Center's FTP. Running this program will provide new Argo float profiles. However, there will be new floats and profiles present if downloaded. This will not match the historical record of Argo floats used in this analysis but could be useful for replicating this analysis when more data becomes available. The historical record of BGC-Argo floats are present in "/raw data/bgc-argo float data/" path. If you wish to downloaded other float data, see Gordon et al. (2020), Hamilton and Leidos (2017) and the data from the misclab website (https://misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/floats/). 1_argo_data_processing.py: This program quality-controls and bins the biogeochemical data into a consistent format. This includes corrections and checks, like the spike/noise test or the non-photochemical quenching correction. 2_sat_data_processing.py: this program processes the satellite data downloaded from the NASA Ocean Color website. 3_stock_bloom_calc.py: this is the main program used to described the results of the study. The program takes the processed Argo data and groups it into regions and calculates slope factors, phytoplankton carbon & chlorophyll-a, global stocks, and bloom metrics. 4_stock_calc_longhurst_province.py: This program repeats the global stocks calculations performed in "3_stock_bloom_calc.py" but bases the grouping on Longhurst Biogeochemical Provinces. How to Replicate this Analysis: Each program should be run in the order listed above. Path names where the data files have been downloaded will need to be updated in the code. To use the exact same Sprof files as used in the paper, skip running "0_ftp_argo_data_download.py" and start with "1_argo_data_processing.py" instead. Use the float data from the folder "bgc-argo float data". The program "0_ftp_argo_data_download.py" downloads the latest data from Argo database, so it is useful for updating the analysis. The program "1_argo_data_processing.py" may also be skipped to save time and the processed BGC-Argo float data may be used instead (see folder named "processed bgc-argo data"). Similarly, the program "2_sat_data_processing.py" may also be skipped, which otherwise can take multiple hours to process. The raw data is available from the NASA Ocean Color website (https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/). The processed data from "2_sat_data_processing.py" is available so this step may be skipped to save time as well. The program "3_stock_bloom_calc.py" will require running "ocean_toolbox.py" (see below) in another tab. The portion of the program that involves QC for the irradiance profiles has been commented out to save processing time, and the pre-processed data used in the study has been linked instead (see folder "processed light data"). Similarly, pre-processed topography data is present in this repository. The original Earth Topography data can be accessed at https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/products/etopo-global-relief-model. A version of "3_stock_bloom_calc.py" using Longhurst provinces is available for exploring alternative groupings and their effects on stock calculations. See the program named "4_stock_calc_longhurst_province.py". You will need to download the Longhurst biogeochemical provinces from https://www.marineregions.org/. To explore the effects of different slope factors, averaging methods, bbp spectral slopes, etc, the user will likely want to make changes to "3_stock_bloom_calc.py". Please do not hesitate to contact the correponding author (Adam Stoer) for guidance or questions. ocean_toolbox.py: import statsmodels.formula.api as smfimport osimport matplotlib.pyplot as pltimport numpy as npfrom uncertainties import unumpy as unpfrom scipy import stats def file_grab(root,find,start): #grabs files by file extensions and location filelst = [] for subdir, dirs, files in os.walk(root): for file in files: filepath = subdir + os.sep + file if filepath.endswith(find): if filepath.startswith(start): filelst.append(filepath) return filelst def sep_bbp(data, name_z, name_chla, name_bbp): ''' data: Pandas Dataframe containing the profile data name_z: name of the depth variable in data name_chla: name of the chlorophyll-a variable in data name_bbp: name of the particle backscattering variable in data returns: the data variable with particle backscattering partitioned into phytoplankton (bbpphy) and non-algal particle components (bbpnap). ''' #name_chla = 'chla' #name_z = 'depth' #name_bbp = 'bbp470' dcm = data[data.loc[:,name_chla]==data.loc[:,name_chla].max()][name_z].values[0] # Find depth of deep chla maximum part_prof = data[(data.loc[:,name_bbp]<np.median(data.loc[:,name_bbp]))] # find median bbp of profile mod = smf.quantreg('bbp470 ~ ' + str(name_z), part_prof).fit(q=0.01) # Find model to 1 percentile y_pred = mod.predict(part_prof.loc[:,name_z]) # Create predicted bbp_nap part_prof.loc[:,'bbp_back'] = y_pred.values # Predicted bbp NAP from linear trend z_lim = part_prof.loc[(part_prof.loc[:,'bbp_back'].div(part_prof.loc[:,name_bbp])>=1), name_z].min() # Find depth where bbp NAP and bbp intersect data.loc[data[name_z]>=z_lim, 'bbp_back'] = data.loc[data[name_z]>=z_lim, name_bbp].tolist() data.loc[data[name_z]<z_lim,'bbp_back'] = data.loc[data[name_z]==z_lim, name_bbp].values[0] #data.loc[data[name_z]<z_lim, name_z].mul(lr.slope).add(lr.intercept) data.loc[:,'bbpphy'] = data.loc[:, name_bbp].sub(data.loc[:,'bbp_back']) # Subtract bbp NAP from bbp for bbp from phytoplankton data.loc[(data['bbpphy']<0)|(data['depth']>z_lim),'bbpphy'] = 0 # Subtract bbp NAP from bbp for bbp from phytoplankton return data['bbpphy'], z_lim def bbp_to_cphy(bbp_data, sf): ''' data: Pandas Dataframe containing the profile data name_bbp: name of the particulate backscattering variable in data name_bbp_err: name of particulate backscattering error variable in data returns: the data variable with particle backscattering [/m] converted into phytoplankton carbon [mg/m^3]. ''' cphy_data = bbp_data.mul(sf) return cphy_data

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: Jeu de données
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,274
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,219
Écart entre enseignants0,186 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle