MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6930501728 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13742601

Triepeolus rhododontus Cockerell 1921

2024· article· en· W6930501728 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueResearch on scale insects
Établissements canadiensCanadian Museum of Nature
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaDorsumProjection (relational algebra)Taxonomy (biology)Epithet

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Triepeolus rhododontus Cockerell, 1921 Figs 9D, 12K, 15D, 26 Triepeolus rhododontus Cockerell, 1921: 5 (♂). Epeolus lectiformis Cockerell, 1925a: 623 (♀), syn. nov. Triepeolus lusor Cockerell, 1925a: 625 (♂), syn. nov. Triepeolus junctus Mitchell, 1962: 471 (♀, ♂), syn. nov. Triepeolus lectiformis – Brumley 1965: 73. Proposed common name Red-spined triepeolus. Diagnosis The following morphological features in combination tell T. rhododontus apart from all other Triepeolus in the simplex species group: the mesopleura laterally do not have erect/suberect, simple setae or have only sparse, short (<¼ MOD), erect/suberect, simple setae in addition to the usual appressed, branched setae (Figs 9D, 26A, C); the trochanters are normal (i.e., not tuberculate) (Fig. 9D); the dorsum of the mesosoma and metasoma have bands of pale-yellow tomentum (Figs 15D, 26); and the T1 discal patch is somewhat narrowed and/or curved posterolaterally and thus allantoid with an inverted U- or horseshoe-shaped anteromedial projection (Figs 15D, 26A–C). Triepeolus rhododontus most closely resembles T. obliteratus and T. oblongimacula sp. nov., but in the latter two species the axillae never (as opposed to commonly; Fig. 26C) have reddish tips, in T. obliteratus the dorsum of the mesosoma and metasoma have bands of pale-gray to white/off-white tomentum, the legs are never (as opposed to commonly) entirely reddish orange from trochanters to tarsi, and the pseudopygidial area of the female is never (as opposed to commonly; Fig. 26D) reddish orange, and in T. oblongimacula the T1 discal patch is broadly rounded laterally and rod-shaped. Etymology The specific epithet was inspired by the holotype’s (partially) red axillae, which in the original description were described as “dentiform, curved, [and] acute” (Cockerell 1921). Rhodo- comes from the Greek ‘rhódon’ (meaning ‘rose’), and dontus comes from the Greek ‘odṓn’ (meaning ‘tooth’). Material examined Primary type material USA – Colorado • ♂, T. lusor holotype; Crook; 24 Aug. 1920; G. Sandhouse leg.; USNM 534850 • ♀, E. lectiformis holotype; Logan County; 23 Aug. 1923; G. Sandhouse leg.; USNM 534641 • ♂, T. rhododontus holotype; Wray (at the head of Dry Willow Creek), Yuma County; 17–19 Aug. 1919; F.E. Lutz leg.; AMNH AMNH_IZC 00323955. – North Carolina • ♀, T. junctus holotype; Lakeview, Moore County; 23 Sep. 1933; T.B. Mitchell leg.; USNM 534640. Secondary type material USA – Colorado • 1 ♀, E. lectiformis paratype; Logan County; 23 Aug. 1923; G. Sandhouse leg.; CAS M.G.R. Database No. 1438. – North Carolina • 1 ♀, T. junctus paratype; Burgaw Savannah; 13 Oct. 1954; T.B. Mitchell leg.; NCSU M.G.R. Database No. 595 • 1 ♂, T. junctus allotype; Raleigh; Sep. 1921; T.B. Mitchell leg.; USNM U.S.N.M. 45898 /M.G.R. Database No. 590. DNA barcoded material Available. BIN: BOLD:AAJ8523. Specimens examined and sequenced: USA – Colorado • 1 ♀; Logan County; 40.4894° N, 102.7412° W; 27 Sep. 2013; M. Vandever et al. leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_127; CSUC • 1 ♀; W of Colorado Springs (Hwy 24), El Paso County; 38.8540° N, 104.8820° W; 3 Aug. 2007; J. Gibbs and C.S. Sheffield leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_021; PCYU PCYU-GS-07:1540. – Maryland • 1 ♂; Cove Point, Calvert County; 38.3868° N, 76.3857° W; 7–8 Oct. 2007; L. Shapiro leg.; BOLD sample ID: CCDB-03761 E08; BIML USGS_ DRO116873. – New Mexico • 1 ♂; 16 km NW of Tucumcari on Hwy 104; 35.2663° N, 103.8480° W; 29 Aug. 2009; C.S. Sheffield, S. Dumesh, and L. Packer leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_139; PCYU. – South Carolina • 1 ♀; Savannah River Site, Aiken County; 33.3758° N, 81.5278° W; 1 Oct. 2018; S. Helmreich leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_164; WRME SCFS005768. Non-barcoded material MEXICO • 2 ♀♀; Chihuahua, 9 mi S of Hidalgo del Parral; 8 Aug. 1967; R.C. Gardner, C.R. Kovacic, and K. Lorenzen leg.; UCBME. USA – Arizona • 1 ♀; 18 mi SW of Apache, Cochise County; 22–23 Aug. 1994; J.G. Rozen and J.S. Ascher leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀; 8 mi NE of Portal, Cochise County; 23–25 Aug. 1989; J.G. Rozen and R.L. Foster leg.; AMNH • 2 ♀♀; 8 mi S of Moons Park, Coconino County; 12 Sep. 1995; Griswold and Tepedino leg.; BBSL BBSL582183, BBSL582214 • 1 ♀; Avra Valley; 6 Jul. 1955; G. Butler and F. Werner leg.; UAIC. – Arkansas • 1 ♀; Eureka Springs (Ouachita Mountains); 6 Sep. 1939; E.C. Van Dyke leg.; CAS • 2 ♀♀; Hot Springs; 1 Oct. 1939; E.C. Van Dyke leg.; CAS • 1 ♀; Knob Hill Rst (Ouachita Mountains); 1 Sep. 1939; E.C. Van Dyke leg.; CAS. – Colorado • 1 ♀; Boulder County; 6 Sep. 1926; C.H. Hicks leg.; UCMC • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 6 Sep. 1926; C.P. Custer leg.; UCMC • 1 ♀; Boulder, Boulder County; 21 Sep. 1932; H.W. Campbell leg.; UCMC • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 5 Sep. 1976; P. Robinson leg.; UCMC • 2 ♀♀; Owens Lake (Boulder); 8 Sep. 1932; C.H. Hicks leg.; UCMC • 1 ♀; Upper Queen Reservoir, Kiowa County; 13 Sep. 1997; D. Leatherman leg.; CSUC. – Florida • 1 ♂; St. Andrews State Park, Panama City, Bay County; 14 Oct. 2000; C. Porter and L. Stange leg.; FSCA. – Georgia • 1 ♀; Tifton; ANSP. – Illinois • 1 ♂; 3.5 mi N of Oquawka, Henderson County; 24 Aug. 1983; E. Miliczky leg.; INHS 7843. – Minnesota • 1 ♂ (studied from images); Altona State Wildlife Management Area, Pipestone County; 44.1928° N, 96.3214° W; “ 8/6/2019 ”; D. Drons leg.; MNDNR MNDNR180590 • 2 ♀♀; Rochester; 30 Aug. 1956; G.E. Bohart leg.; BBSL BBSL522481, BBSL522624 • 1 ♀ (studied from images); Zumbra Heights, Carver County; 31 Aug. 1929; E.C. Alfonsus leg.; UMSP UMSP146916. – Mississippi • 1 ♀; West Point; 16 Sep. 1904; F.C. Bishopp leg.; USNM M.G.R. Database No. 1373 • 2 ♂♂; same data as for preceding; 16 Sep. 1904; F.C. Bishopp leg.; USNM M.G.R. Database Nos 1371, 1372. – Missouri • 4 ♀♀; Branson; 15 Sep. 1939; E.C. Van Dyke leg.; CAS • 2 ♀♀; same data as for preceding; 16 Sep. 1939; E.C. Van Dyke leg.; CAS • 1 ♀; Columbia, Boone County; 1 Sep. 1966; F.D. Parker leg.; UCBME M.G.R. Database No. 1390 • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; 25 Sep. 1966; F.D. Parker leg.; UCBME M.G.R. Database No. 1378. – New Mexico • 2 ♂♂; 16 km NW of Tucumcari on Hwy 104; 35.2663° N, 103.8480° W; 29 Aug. 2009; C.S. Sheffield, S. Dumesh, and L. Packer leg.; PCYU • 1 ♀; 26 mi S of Animas, Hidalgo County; 20 Aug. 1986; R.J. McGinley and B.M. Norden leg.; USNM • 1 ♀; Las Cruces; 30 Aug.; Townsend leg.; USNM • 1 ♀; same data as for preceding; Aug. ??27; Townsend leg.; USNM • 1 ♀; Las Vegas, San Miguel County; 35.6176° N, 105.2074° W; 30 Aug. 2007; J. Gibbs and C.S. Sheffield leg.; PCYU PYU-3394 • 1 ♀; St. Vrain, Curry County; 3 Oct. 1965; BBSL. – New York • 1 ♀; Long Island; “09”; G. Salt leg.; NHMUK B.M.1931-343 • 1 ♂; Napeague (Long Island); 2 Jul. 1954; R. Latham leg.; USNM M.G.R. Database No. 1370. – North Carolina • 3 ♂♂; Black Mountains; AMNH Ac. 33827/M.G.R. Database Nos 1379 to 1381 • 1 ♀; Moore County; 8 Oct. 1964; B.S. Heming leg.; DEBU debu01089134. – Oklahoma • 1 ♂; Songbird Park (Norman), Cleveland County; 35.1700° N, 97.4200° W; 5 Sep. 2022; K.L.J. Hung leg.; OKBS OKBS.POL.5883. – South Carolina • 1 ♀; Columbia; 18 Sep. 1951; L. and G. Townes leg.; CAS M.G.R. Database No. 597. – Tennessee • 1 ♀; Memphis; 9 Sep. 1920; “ Ex Coll. M.A. Cazier ”; AMNH M.G.R. Database No. 1382. – Texas • 1 ♂; El Paso, El Paso County; 11 Jul. 1917; G. Salt leg.; NHMUK • 1 ♀; Lajitas, Brewster County; 2 Oct. 1960; J.E. Gillaspy leg.; CAS. Redescription MEASUREMENTS OF HOLOTYPE. Body length 8.7 mm; ITW 1.9 mm; head length 2.3 mm; head width 3.3 mm; fore wing length 7.1 mm. Both sexes INTEGUMENT COLORATION. Dark brown to black except as follows. Mandible with apical two-fifths golden yellow. Mandible with basal three-fifths (except for extreme base); labrum to some extent (except basomedially); scape, pedicel, and F1 to some extent (entirely dark brown/black in some non-type specimens); pronotal lobe (entirely black in T. junctus holotype and paratype and multiple non-type specimens); tegula; axilla with tip (entirely black in E. lectiformis holotype, T. junctus holotype and paratype, and multiple non-type specimens); coxae to some extent; trochanters to tibiae (excluding brown meso- and metatibial spurs) partially to entirely; tarsi entirely; metasomal terga laterally (entirely dark brown/black in T. junctus holotype and paratype and multiple non-type specimens); pygidial plate to some extent; and metasomal sterna to some extent (entirely dark brown/black in some non-type specimens) orange. F2 with orange spot basally (entirely dark brown in some non-type specimens). Fore wing membrane dusky subhyaline throughout. Hind wing membrane dusky subhyaline to hyaline. PUBESCENCE. Face with tomentum densest around antennal socket. Clypeus, upper paraocular and frontal areas, and vertexal area mostly exposed. Pronotal collar with tomentum uniformly pale yellow. Mesoscutum with well-defined paramedian band of pale-yellow tomentum; pale tomentum otherwise mostly restricted to lateral and posterior margins. Mesopleuron with off-white to pale-yellow, appressed, branched setae; upper half densely setose, except behind pronotal lobe, with setae slightly sparser on hypoepimeral area; ventrolateral half nearly bare, except along margins. Metanotum with tomentum uninterrupted, uniformly pale yellow. Propodeal triangle mostly glabrous, with (pale) setae restricted to small lateral patches. Metasomal terga with bands of pale-yellow tomentum. T1 with basal and apical transverse bands interrupted medially (former more widely than latter) (T1 with apical transverse band narrowed medially in T. junctus holotype and allotype and multiple non-type specimens) and subparallel, discal patch transversely oblong (verging on widely trapezoidal in T. rhododontus holotype). T2–T4 with apical transverse bands complete and medially somewhat removed from apical margins of terga, that of T2 with pair of basomedially convergent anterolateral extensions. S2–S3 with medially interrupted apical transverse bands of white tomentum. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Labrum coarsely and densely

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,701
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0020,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0340,022

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,049
Tête enseignante GPT0,249
Écart entre enseignants0,200 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle