MICCAI 2025 Lighthouse Challenge: Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Critical View of Safety (SAGES-CVS)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The application of Computer Vision (CV) and Machine Learning (ML) to minimally invasive surgery promises objective assessment of visual features in surgical video that contribute to surgical decision-making. Future prospects for surgical risk mitigation include enhanced supervision for surgeons and augmented teaching opportunities. Currently, surgical Artificial Intelligence (AI) is limited to research, waiting to be translated into clinical practice. There is a lack of widely validated results, calibration of uncertainty, robustness to domain shifts, and a high computational barrier to enable wide deployment that limits the application of AI to life-saving intraoperative use. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a standardized operation for gallbladder removal, is one of the most frequently performed minimally invasive procedures worldwide. While it has become a benchmark procedure for computational exploration of intraabdominal video data, there is no clinical translation, partly due to the limited generalizability of AI architectures developed almost entirely on localized, homogenous datasets. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Critical View of Safety (CVS) Challenge is the first international biomedical data challenge from a surgical society, offering a unique infrastructure for global data collection and leveraging multidisciplinary expertise for the standardized assessment of the CVS. The aim of the challenge is to computationally address the detection of CVS, a routinely performed surgical safety measure crucial for minimizing bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy. Despite the high frequency of cases and standardized operative approach for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, there is a risk of significant intra- and post-operative complications, such as common bile duct injuries. Assisting surgeons in achieving and recognizing the CVS will help to improve the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy worldwide. The challenge offers a global and diverse dataset of 1000 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos, provided by 67 surgeons (data donors) from 53 countries and 6 continents, alongside clinically relevant metadata. This dataset encompasses a wide diversity of patient demographics and procedural quality to reflect the worldwide diversity in patients and surgeons. The data will be released to the global community with the aim of developing models capable of reliably and consistently classifying the CVS with adequate generalizability to the global patient population. By incorporating the perspectives of clinicians, computer scientists, and industry through structured multidisciplinary Advisory Committees (AC), the challenge offers the opportunity for the development of AI suitable for high-stakes surgical settings. Data acquisition was designed to provide consistent and reliable deidentification of out-of-body images and pseudonymization of metadata. The dataset has been meticulously curated based on standardized protocols composed through expert consensus of the multidisciplinary ACs. The data has been indexed according to demographics -- source location, performing surgeons` experience level, surgical indication, and clinical characteristics in the video (e.g., fluorescence, robotics, intraoperative cholangiogram). Each video was annotated with the CVS and its subcomponents to ensure consistency and reliability in the data. The structured annotationpipeline, rooted in a consensus annotation protocol revised by clinical experts in hepatobiliary surgery, includes proficiency-based training of annotators from multiple countries. The annotation task was the classification of the three CVS Criteria on a video and frame basis. The execution of the CVS Challenge is governed by metrics selected by the multidisciplinary AC to evaluate AI models` performance in identifying the achievement of the subcomponents and overall CVS. Participants can work with various data splits, enabling them to test the robustness of their algorithms across a heterogeneous dataset rich in clinical and demographic variability. The CVS Challenge sets a new benchmark in collaborative efforts between surgeons and computer scientists, encompassing consensus-based guidelines governing a global data acquisition and curation framework. Additionally, structured annotation curricula based on clinical expert consensus, ensure a homogenous, clinically meaningful ground truth for model training. The primary aim of the challenge is to ensure uniformity in the computational assessment of the CVS for high clinical value, with the goal to improve safety and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The extensive dataset, rigorous curation protocol, and strategic execution of thechallenge, backed by a strong advisory framework, pave the way for transformative developments in surgical practice and patient care as well as opening the possibility for future challenge iterations. The final version of this document including further revisions will be released soon.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,031 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,014 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».