Albomagister luteifolius Lebeuf, Matheny & Sanchez-Garcia 2024, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Albomagister luteifolius Lebeuf, Matheny & Sánchez-García, sp. nov. (Figs. 4A–4B, 6G–6I) MYCOBANK: MB851401. TYPE: Canada, Quebec, Saint-Thuribe, Rang Saint-Léon (42.3327 -72.9571), on soil in mixed forest including Fagus grandifolia with few Abies balsamea, 16 September 2018, R. Lebeuf HRL2773 (holotype designated here DAOM 984969, isotype TENN-F-074689). DIAGNOSIS: Differs from other species of Albomagister by the habit similar to Inocybe geophylla, yellowing lamellae, and distinct phylogenetic position sister to A. subaustralis. Habit inocyboid resembling Inocybe geophylla in outward appearance. Pileus 7–30 mm wide, campanulate, margin inflexed then deflexed; surface dry, with appressed radial fibrils, at times with watery drops near the margin; white, pale yellow over the center; context yellowish white to pale yellow (3A2, 3A3), thin; odor none, taste bitter. Lamellae adnexed to sinuate, distant to moderately so, 1.5–5 mm deep; white at first, becoming yellowish white (4A2) and darker yellow with age, light yellow (near 4A5) after drying, not waxy. Stipe 20–60 × 1–6 mm, equal, often curved; surface dry, veil not observed, pruinose to flocculose at the apex, fibrillosestriate below, when young with watery drops near the apex; white; context yellowish white to pale yellow. KOH negative on surfaces of the pileus and stipe and on the stipe context. Basidiospores 4.5– 5.0 –6 × (3–)3.5– 3.7 –4(–4.5) µm, Q 1.13– 1.37 –1.57(–1.71) (n = 90/3), elliptic to broadly elliptic (more broadly so from less mature basidiomes), smooth, inamyloid, white in deposit. Basidia 21–27 × 6–7 µm, 4-spored, clavate. Pleurocystidia 38–66 × 8–14 µm, frequent, fusiform to subutriform or subcylindric or oblong, often shortpedicellate, thin-walled, hyaline. Cheilocystidia 48–75 × 8– 14 µm, similar to pleurocystidia but at times long-pedicellate (pedicels up to 20 µm long). Pileipellis a cutis composed of cylindric hyphae 2–7 µm wide; tramal hyphae inflated, 5–20 µm wide. Stipitipellis without caulocystidia; hyphae cylindric, 3–9 µm wide. Clamp connections abundant in all tissues. TAXONOMIC NOTES: Albomagister luteifolius and A. subaustralis are difficult to distinguish based on morphology only. Indeed, both are sister taxa, but A. luteifolius, based on the proportion of samples sequenced, appears to be the less frequently encountered of the two species. Based on available data, A. luteifolius is best distinguished from A. subaustralis by the smaller Inocybe geophylla- like habit. Comparison of dried materials of both species suggests neither can be reliably distinguished by the yellowish to ocher-yellow color of the dried lamellae. Albomagister luteifolius does not appear to be common but has been overlooked and misidentified as A. subaustralis in the past (see AHS14872 cited under H. subaustralis in Hesler and Smith 1963). The species occurs in mixed hardwood forests and mixed forests including conifers and has a wide geographic range having been confirmed by molecular data from Quebec and the southern Appalachians during August and September. Albomagister luteifolius equates to Albomagister sp. 2 in Sánchez-García et al. (2014, 2017). ETYMOLOGY: luteifolius (Latin), yellow gills, in reference to the yellowish-tinged lamellae. DISTRIBUTION AND ECOLOGY: Albomagister luteifolius is widely distributed across eastern North America, having been found in Quebec, North Carolina, and Tennessee, but a broad sampling gap occurs between those regions. It occurs singly to scattered or gregarious on acidic or possibly more nutrient enriched soils at relatively low- to mid-elevations (<1200 m) in leaf litter in mixed hardwood- Tsuga canadensis dominated forests, cove hardwood forests under Quercus, northern hardwood forests, and in mixed forests containing Fagus, Abies, and/or Betula. Basidiomes were recorded in August and September. Sánchez-García and Matheny (2017) also produced an rpb1 sequence (KU139018) for MSG137 (TENN-F-068776). OTHER SPECIMENS EXAMINED: Canada, Quebec, Saint-Thuribe, Rang Saint-Léon (42.3327 -72.0571), in beech-maple forest under Fagus grandifolia, 11 September 2020, R. Lebeuf & A. Paul HRL3286 (DAOM 984970); ibid., under Fagus grandifolia, Betula alleghaniensis, 11 September 2020, R. Lebeuf & A. Paul HRL3287 (DAOM 984971). USA, North Carolina, McDowell Co., Marion, Armstrong Creek (35.6830 -82.0058), in mixed hardwood forest with Tsuga canadensis, 21 September 2012, M. Sánchez-García MSG136 (TENN-F-068775); McDowell Co., Little Switzerland, Blue Ridge Parkway, Swofford Road near Table Rock Overlook (36.5186 -80.9358), in mixed hardwood forest along a gravel road, 21 September 2012, B.P. Looney MSG137 (TENN-F-068776); McDowell Co., near Marion, Pisgah National Forest, Victor Road (35.803 -82.162), in a swamp forest bog complex under Betula, Tsuga, Quercus, 22 September 2023, S.R. Warwick & P.B. Matheny PBM4797 (TENN-F-078516); Mitchell Co., Roses Creek, on acidic soil in cove hardwood forest, 22 September 2023, C.R. Noffsinger CRN92223A (TENN-F-078620). Tennessee, Blount Co., Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Cades Cove (35.5942 -83.842), in rich cove hardwood forest with Quercus, 17 Aug. 1939, A.H. Smith AHS14872 (MICH 58090 as “ Hygrophorus subaustralis ”).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».