Empis (Enoplempis) aphela Sinclair, Brooks & Cumming, 2025, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Empis (Enoplempis) aphela sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 5DE83A61-E5A9-4776-94B0-D0A1988A999D (Figs 286, 292, 293, 307) Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂, labelled: “USA: CA: Contra Costa Co. / 0.3km N Cave Point, pasture/ oak edge, ex: Malaise, 563m,/ 22.iv.2012, K.Will, 37°50′38″N / 121°52′51″W./ [CAL.2012.iv.22.1]/ 10394, CNC / CSCA ”; “ HOLOTYPE / Empis (Enoplempis) / aphela Sinclair,/ Brooks & Cumming [red label]” (CSCA). PARATYPES: USA. California: Alameda County: Cedar Mtn [37.559°N 121.606°W], 3.iii.1968, P.A. Opler (1♂, EMEC). Contra Costa County: same data as holotype (1♂, CNC). Tuolumne County: Tuolumne City [37°57′N 120°14′W], 3 mi. NE, 23.iii.1966, R. L. Langston (1♂, EMEC). Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from others of the subgenus by the grey body and males are dichoptic, with unmodified hindleg (Fig. 286), swollen hind tarsomere 1, mid tibia with biserial row of strong ventral setae, hind tibia without long, slender anterior setae and cercus not greatly expanded dorsally, posterior margin projecting and tapered (Fig. 292). Description. Wing length 5.7–5.8 mm. Male. Similar to E. (En.) californica sp. nov., except as follows: head with antennal scape and pedicel yellowish, paler than postpedicel. Frons below ocellar triangle slightly broader than width of ocellar triangle. Thorax with antepronotum with 2–4 pairs of dark setae. Legs short, slender, orange brown, apical segments of tarsi darker brown; coxae with or without dense greyish pruinescence. Femora with white ventral pile, longest on hind femur. Fore tibia with erect posterior setae on apical three-quarters, length subequal to width of tibia; without long dorsal and ventral setae; anterior face with short appressed setae. Fore tarsomere 1 swollen with dorsal setae, length subequal to width of tarsomere, with fine dense ventral setae; tarsomeres 2–5 with biserial row of spine-like ventral setae; tarsomeres 1–4 with apicolateral pair of spine-like setae, longer than width of segment. Mid femur similar to fore femur. Mid tibia with several long posterodorsal setae, without long apical setae; strong, spine-like biserial row of ventral setae on apical half; apex with pair of strong ventral setae. Mid tarsomere 1 without long dorsal setae; tarsomeres 1–5 with biserial row of spine-like ventral setae; tarsomeres 1–4 with apicolateral pair of spine-like setae, longer than width of segment. Hind femur slender without modified setae and processes; row of fine anteroventral setae, shorter than width of femur (Fig. 286). Hind tibia without processes or modified setae; long dorsal setae, length more than twice width of tibia on apical third; anterior face without long setae; fine erect ventral setae, length less than width of tibia (Fig. 286). Hind tarsus swollen with long dorsal setae, similar to tibia, with strong setae among finer dense ventral setae (Fig. 286); tarsomeres 2–5 similar to fore tarsus. Terminalia (Figs 292, 293): epandrium brown, with cerci and phallus orange brown and shiny. Cercus slightly expanded dorsally, posterior margin not sloping; dorsal margin scalloped, with posteroventral elongation; setae shorter than width of cercus. Subepandrial process extending on either side of phallus. Epandrial lamella elongate, longer than height; posterior margin truncate, slightly upturned dorsally at apex; bearing long setae ventrally, longer than width of epandrium. Hypandrium expanded, width subequal to length; truncate dorsally; without setae. Phallus (Fig. 293) with basal half not strongly expanded, tapered apically, with distinct bend near mid-length; apical half gently arched, apex emerging beyond epandrium; apex with subapical flange, otherwise not expanded, with roughened subapical surface; ejaculatory apodeme more than half-length of epandrium, Y-shaped, with lateral apodemes positioned near the ventral margin with short medial apodeme. Female. Unknown. Geographical distribution and seasonal occurrence (Fig. 307). Empis (En.) aphela sp. nov. is known from central California. Adults have been collected in March and April. Etymology. The species name is derived from the Greek apheles meaning even or smooth, in reference to the unmodified hind leg of this and similar species. Nuptial gift presentation. Form unknown.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,051 | 0,035 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».