Notice bibliographique
Résumé
162 Euura reticulata (Holmgren, 1883) Figs 159, 390 Nematus arcticus Thomson, 1871: 134. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Lindqvist (1954). Primary homonym of Nematus arcticus Holmgren, 1869 [Euura villosa (Thomson, 1863)]. Nematus reticulatus Holmgren, 1883: 143, pl. 1 fig. 2. Lectotype designated below. Nematus morionellus Holmgren, 1883: 144, pl. 1 fig. 3. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Lindqvist (1944a). Nematus mysticus Holmgren, 1883: 145, pl. 1 fig. 7. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Lindqvist (1944a). Nematus anceps Holmgren, 1883: 145, pl. 1 fig. 6. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Lindqvist (1967a). Nematus occipitalis Holmgren, 1883: 144, pl. 1 fig. 4. Lectotype designated below. Synonymy by Lindqvist (1967a). Nematus picticollis Holmgren, 1883: 147, pl. 1 fig. 13a–b. Syntypes ♀♀ (NHRS), not examined. Type locality: Russia, Novaja Zemlya, Matotschkin Scharr. Synonymy by Lindqvist (1944a). Nematus arcticola Dalla Torre, 1894: 207. Replacement name for Nematus arcticus Thomson, 1871. Pontania popofiana Kincaid, 1900: 353. Syntypes (10 ♀♀, 6 ♂♂) (USNMENT00778201, USNM, http://n 2t.net/ark:/65665/3240d29be-a367-4853-a1ce-76ecf6dfc128), not examined. Type locality: USA, Alaska, East Aleutians, Popof Island. Pontania glinka Kincaid, 1900: 355–356. Lectotype ♀ (USNMENT00778180, USNM, http://n 2t.net/ark:/65665/33b04de0e-ef1d-451c-8c05-35cddd9ef1cc), not examined. Type locality: USA, Alaska, East Aleutians, Popof Island. Pontania forsiusi Enslin, 1915: 354–355. Synonymy by Benson (1961b). Amauronematus arcticola Enslin, 1915: 388–389. Replacement name for Nematus arcticus Thomson, 1871. Secondary homonym of Nematus arcticola Dalla Torre, 1894 [= Euura reticulata (Holmgren, 1883)]. Amauronematus alsius Benson, 1935: 31–33. Synonymy by Benson (1961b). Diagnosis Females vary from mostly black to mostly pale and 4.5–6.5 mm. See discussion under the similar species E. lienterica and E. renei for distinguishing characters. Female 4.5–6.5 mm. Head extensively pale around eyes to nearly black; labrum, clypeus, and supraclypeal area pale; flagellum black to partly pale; thorax nearly completely pale to mostly black; pronotum and tegula completely pale to partly pale; pterostigma brown; metafemur completely pale to mostly brown; metatibia and -tarsi nearly completely pale to extensively brown; abdomen dorsally mostly black, ventrally completely pale to nearly completely black. Mesepisternum usually slightly matt. Middle annuli of saw straight. Lamnium 2.4–2.8 times as long as radix. A small (4.5 mm) and very dark female specimen which has been sequenced is for example ZMUO.041895. Male 4.5–5.5 (6.0?) mm. Body (usually?) nearly completely black. Labrum pale to black; pterostigma brown or dark brown; metafemur nearly completely black; metatibia and -tarsi nearly pale brown to dark brown; sternum 9 extensively pale to black. Type material examined Lectotype Nematus arcticus, here designated SWEDEN • ♀; Dalarna alpina; C.H. Boheman leg.; MZLU, MZLU2017307. Lectotype Nematus reticulatus, here designated RUSSIA – Novaja Zemlya • ♀; Matotschkin Scharr [Matochkin Strait]; 73.3° N, 55.6° E; 1875; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006452. Paralectotypes Nematus reticulatus RUSSIA – Novaja Zemlya • 3 ♀♀; Matotschkin Scharr [Matochkin Strait]; 73.3° N, 55.6° E; 1875; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006448 to NHRS-HEVA000006450. Notes Heads of the lectotype and paralectotype HEVA000006450 look more like E. lienterica, but the mesepisternum appears slightly matt. The heads of the other two syntypes are missing. Setae of the lancet of the type specimens seem to be somewhat different (particularly: fewer setae on the basalmost annular suture) from sequenced specimens. Lectotype Nematus morionellus, here designated RUSSIA – Novaja Zemlya • ♀; Matotschkin Scharr [Matochkin Strait]; 73.3° N, 55.6° E; 1875; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006451. Notes This is a very dark specimen of E. reticulata (lancet; identified as such) or E. lienterica (head) (antenna missing). Lectotype Nematus mysticus, here designated RUSSIA – Novaja Zemlya • ♀; Besimannija bay [Bezimyannaya Bay]; 72.86° N, 53.59° E; 1875; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006471 Lectotype Nematus anceps, here designated RUSSIA • ♀; Novaja Zemlya; 1875; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006467. Notes Rather dark (e.g., mesepisternum). Lancet looks more like E. reticulata and mesepisternum seems matt, but the head looks more like E. lienterica. Lectotype Nematus occipitalis, here designated RUSSIA • ♀; Novaja Zemlya; 1875; NHRS, NHRS-HEVA000006453. Notes It is not clear whether this specimen belongs to E. reticulata or E. lienterica. Holotype Pontania forsiusi FINLAND – Fjell-Lappland • ♀; Kittilä; 67.7° N, 25.0° E; R. Krogerus leg.; ZSM, GBIF-GISHym3284. Holotype Amauronematus alsius UNITED KINGDOM – Scotland • Cairngorm Mts, Lairig Ghru; 57.09° N, 3.69° W; above 610 m a.s.l.; 10 Jun. 1934; R.B. and J.E. Benson leg.; BMNH, B.M.TYPEHYM.1.640. Host plants We reared and sequenced three larvae, one each on Salix sp., Vaccinium uliginosum, and Betula nana. The larvae are likely offspring of a female (ZMUO.067423) for which these plants were simultaneously offered, although we did not observe the female ovipositing and the larvae were discovered 16 days later. The larvae are probably sisters, because they are genetically almost identical. The three larvae developed slowly, the last one was preserved in alcohol 1.5 months after it was found, but appeared to be still in the feeding stage. Another female (PR.604 VV, not sequenced) oviposited in S. herbacea and S. polaris Wahlenb. Genetics COI Based on 20 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 3.8% and the nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.61%, is Euura seriepunctata. Nuclear Based on 16 specimens, maximum within-species distance is 0.48% (0.39% based on haplotypes of individual females). The nearest neighbour, diverging by a minimum of 0.88%, is Euura renei. Distribution and material examined Palaearctic. Specimens studied are from Finland, Norway, Russia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,045 | 0,025 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».