MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6930865171 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15701724

Dysagrionites allenbyensis Archibald & Cannings, 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6930865171 sur OpenAlexaff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCancer Mechanisms and Therapy
Établissements canadiensRoyal British Columbia Museum
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeWingOblique caseSpace (punctuation)Apex (geometry)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dysagrionites allenbyensis sp. nov. ZooBank Registration number: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: E1F8815D-1BB4-4090-99EE-08A9273CEE79 Figure 1 Type material. Holotype BBM-P 000020 A and B (part and counterpart). A well-preserved wing with colouration, missing the apical portion. Found by Beverley Burlingame on 2 April 2024 and donated to the Beaty Biodiversity Museum, where it is housed. Diagnosis. The wing of Dysagrionites allenbyensis is most like those of Okanopteryx Archibald and Cannings (three species as discussed below) and Stenodiafanus Archibald and Cannings (one species as discussed below). It is distinct from those of Okanopteryx by: CuA space expanded to three cells wide for much of its length from subquadrangle to terminus [O. jeppesenorum Archibald and Cannings maximum four; O. fraseri Archibald and Cannings usually two, sometimes a single row of three]; pigmented fascia wide, extending from nodus to at least 15 and probably 17 cells beyond it [O. macabeensis Archibald and Cannings nine (holotype) to 11]. It is distinct from Stenodiafanus westersidei Archibald and Cannings by dark fascia [S. westersidei: hyaline throughout] and CuA space width [S. westersidei: maximum two cells in equivalent region preserved]. Description. As above and the following: RP3–4 origin at two-thirds the distance from arculus to subnodus. Postnodal and postsubnodal crossveins almost all aligned. Apex of wing and pterostigma unknown by preservation. No oblique crossvein O. CuA progressively zigzagged in distal quarter; MA zigzagged in distal third (final portion not fully preserved); IR1 almost linear from its origin three cells from origin of RP-2; other main veins linear (but distal portions missing). CuA space expanded in the middle, three cells wide for most of its length. Ax1, Ax2 preserved, arculus aligned with Ax2; subnodus distinctly angled, normal obliquity. Membrane hyaline except for dark fascia mid-wing from nodus to the level of at least 15 postnodal crossveins and probably 17 in total. Geologic shear forces may at times somewhat distort fossils at this exposure, and so the apparent narrowness of the wing might be an artefact (Archibald and Cannings 2021b; Archibald et al. 2023a). Etymology. The specific epithet is a toponym referring to the Allenby Formation. Range and age. Vermilion Bluffs Member of the Allenby Formation about 4 km southwest of the village of Princeton, British Columbia. Ypresian (see above). Remarks. Dysagrionites allenbyensis is immediately notable for its broad, dark fascia mid-wing. Within the Dysagrionidae, such colouration is found only in species of Okanopteryx (Archibald et al. 2021). The genus is known by three species from Okanagan Highlands localities: O. macabeensis (type species) and O. fraseri from the McAbee locality near Cache Creek, British Columbia, and O. jeppesenorum from Republic, Washington (Archibald et al. 2021). Okanagrion hobani Archibald and Cannings (Dysagrionidae) is also known from both Republic and McAbee but has not been found in the Allenby Formation. The preserved veins of BBM-P000020 agree with those that, in combination, are partly diagnostic of Okanopteryx: no accessory antenodal crossveins; the subnodus is distinctly angled, with normal obliquity; the origin of IR2 is rather evenly spaced between RP1–2 and RP3–4; MA is linear to mid-wing, then becomes increasingly zigzagged; MA and MP are close at margin; CuA is increasingly zigzagged from about mid-wing; the postnodal and postsubnodal crossveins are almost all aligned; and there is no intercalary vein in the CuA–A space. However, other character states necessary to assign a wing to the genus in combination with the above cannot be evaluated on this incomplete fossil: the shape and size of the pterostigma; presence of an oblique brace vein; number of cells wide in the costal space distad the pterostigma; and a distinct convergence of RA, RP1, IR1, RP2 at apex. Dysagrionites allenbyensis does not greatly differ from O. macabeensis in particular and could be a regional variant of that species, close in distance (ca. 150 km) and time (age estimates overlap: McAbee: 52.10 ± 0.26 Ma, Vermillion Bluffs: 51.85 ± 0.85 Ma; both Rubino et al. 2021). These preserved character states are also found in Stenodiafanus (see diagnosis in Archibald et al. 2021). The broad, dark fascia of BBM-P000020 might easily be present convergently in a species of that genus, and the width of the CuA space could vary among its species as it does among those of Okanopteryx. Stenodiafanus westersidei is known only from the Klondike Mountain Formation, about 150 km distant and close in time (estimated ages overlap: Klondike Mountain B4131 at 51.18 ± 0.09 Ma and Vermillion Bluffs as above; both Rubino et al. 2021). McAbee, the Allenby Formation, and the Klondike Mountain Formation had similar climates and forests (Greenwood et al. 2005; Archibald et al. 2011).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,047
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,093

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,268
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetCancer Mechanisms and TherapyTravaux en français237 207